similar to: How to split immediate in assembly output?

On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 02:40:43AM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote: > Hi Arsen, > > > > On Jun 19, 2014, at 10:43 PM, Arsen Hakobyan <artinetstudio at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I want to generate an assembly instruction for my target using target > > description representation of the instruction. The problem is that I want to

As seen on my post at: http://www.sveasoft.com/modules/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=28112#28112 This works very well... It does NOT work with stable 4.0! sveasoft will be issuing a bug fix for this (4.1) in the near future. Final Rev of working script w/ asterisk support I'm not going to run alchemy on production machines until it is stablish. Remember to set your uplink properly and to set

Hello! I have run a simple regression - lm and created a regression object "myreg". I can see all the coefficients when I print(myreg). Then I tried to run vif(myreg) from the package "car". However, it's giving me an error: in vif.lm(regr.f) : there are aliased coefficients in the model Very sorry for my question: Is there any way to get the vif's for all predictors?

I am a little confused about the relationship between library.dynam and dyn.load >From the documentation: library.dynam(chname, Load the specified file of compiled code if it has not been loaded already, or unloads it. Where chname is a character string naming a shared library to load. and dyn.load(x, local = TRUE, now = TRUE) Load or unload shared libraries, and test whether a C function

Widows XP R 2.3.1 I have been trying to make a data structure that will contain both the coefficients from a linear regression along with column and row titles AND the call, i.e. myreg<-lm(y~x+y+z) whatIwant<-cbind(c(summary(myreg)$call,"",""),summary(myreg)$coefficients) Neither the statement above, nor any one of twenty variations I have tried work. I would appreciate

Hello. I have problems specifying vector instructions with immediate values in TableGen. I wrote the following specification (I got inspired from the MSA vector instructions for the Mips back end): class MSA_I16_FMT<bits<9> opcode>: MSAInst { bits<16> s16; let Inst{31-23} = opcode; let Inst{26-11} = s16; }

Ok, I understand a bit more of what's going on in my phi example. Coming into DAGtoDAG we have this code: bb74: x = phi(1.0:bb134, %r1450:bb108) y = phi(undef:bb134, x:bb108) [...] bb108: %r1450 = <expr> After DAGtoDAG we have: bb134: %reg1459 = IMPLICIT_DEF %reg1458 = 1.0 bb74: %reg1176 = phi(%reg1458:bb134, %reg1253:bb108) %reg1177 = phi(%reg1459:bb134,

Is it possible to get a register number to which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? More Specifically: SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) { op3 = cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)->getReg();

> On Feb 27, 2015, at 1:59 AM, Ambuj Agrawal <ambujbwt at gmail.com> wrote: > > Is it possible to get a register number to which the value is allocated to in MIPS in DAGToDAG class? > > More Specifically: > SDValue Reg3 = Node->getOperand(3); > if (RegisterSDNode *R = dyn_cast<RegisterSDNode>(Reg3)) >

On Mar 27, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2007, at 7:12 AM, Christopher Lamb wrote: > >> While beginning to add vector registers to a back end I came >> across the following problem: as soon as I define two sets of >> registers that have a many-to-one mapping the live interval pass >> appears to double-kill the mapped-onto register. I

Hi Alex, So far, the code you've mentioned only defines a couple tablegen classes but doesn't define the instruction itself. To define the instruction you will also need a 'def' statement. For MIPS MSA, this statement looks like this: def LD_D: LD_D_ENC, LD_D_DESC; This defines an instruction (LD_D) with the encoding specified by the LD_D_ENC class, and the operation

On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:53 AM, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: > Hi All, > > when looking through all the existing targets, I see that each of > them defines > <Target>ISelLowering.{cpp,h} files. However, they define a class > called > "<Target>TargetLowering" (though the comments in [at least some of] > those > files stay the define

Thanks for your reply Quentin. I do understand that the registers are allocated much later in the pipeline. I am assuming that the physical registers are allocated before MipsAsmPrinter class. I am doing something like if (MI->getOpcode() == Mips::OPCODE) { unsigned n = MI->getNumOperands(); for(unsigned i=0 ; i < n ; i++) { const MachineOperand &MO =

Hello, I'm trying to define in my new back end, in MyBackendInstrInfo.td file, a vector load instruction that takes an immediate address operand. (I got inspired from Mips' MSA SIMD extensions.) Could you please tell me what's the right way to do it? Here, the load class has $addrsrc which is a relative address with base a certain register and offset: class

I think DAGToDAG is too late because the build_vector has already been turned into a constant pool load by then so it’s a little difficult to get back. Maybe we can delay it to !DCI.isBeforeLegalizeOps()? That would at least let the first DAG combine and the post type legalization DAG combine see the add, 1. +Sanjay as well From: Amaury Séchet <deadalnix at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August

Hello, I am new to using R and I am having problems get boot() to work properly. Here is what I am trying to do: I have statistic called "cs". cs takes a data matrix (154 x 5) and calculates 12 different scores for me. cs outputs the data as a vector (12 x 1). cs doesn't really use weights, per se, however I have included this as one of the 2 arguments cs can take. I try

No objections from me to make it run later. I didn't see the potential conflicts when I added that code. Delayed combine, custom lowering, or DAGToDAGISel all seem like viable options to me. On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 2:04 PM Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > I have previously posted these two patches: > > [X86][CodeGen][NFC] Delay `combineIncDecVector()` from

Hi, One more thing I just realized for the method Chris mentioned. >Actually that's not true. You can make instructions with an asmstring of: > > ".byte 123\n .byte 56\n .byte 86" and those bytes will get emitted to >the code stream. It seems to work on generating binary file since it uses asmstring, right? There are two steps related with binary file operation,

The macro $src, $dest used in Instruction::AsmString must be "declared" in Instruction::OperandList, right? $$ has special meaning? On 5/6/05, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 6 May 2005, Tzu-Chien Chiu wrote: > > llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86InstrInfo.td: > > class X86Inst<bits<8> opcod, Format f, ImmType i, dag ops, string > >

So, an update. I have managed to generate comments, although it does create a non-existent instruction. My method is as follows (and I would appreciate any comments on how to do it "better", although note that this won't make it into the final code :).) 1. I declared a "fake" instruction type to hold comments, ala: class FakeInst<dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr,