similar to: [LLVMdev] Phabricator and Apple email addresses

Do you have a bounced email, we can look at for clues? > On Jul 10, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > Ok, apple addresses still bounce without a reason - the sendgrid folks say this is completely controlled by apple.com <http://apple.com/>'s mail servers - do you have somebody you can ask? > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:10 AM Manuel

It's actually surprising to me that the emails from Phabricator and llvm's svn *DO* get through most of the time. Both of these fabricate the "From" address to generate an email purportedly be from the author of the svn revision or phabricator comment's email address. While the message is hopefully from the real person behind that email address, those messages are decidedly

I filed a ticket with sendgrid. Since we're paying them money nowadays, I hope they'll answer quickly On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:05 AM Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > aaaaaand you're on the bounce list again. I'm going to delete you again, > but I'd be curious what the problem is... > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:50 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> On Jul 8, 2015, at 9:16 AM, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com <mailto:klimek at google.com>> wrote: >> >> You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other people had

You were in sendgrid's bounce list (there must have been at least one bounce from your email to the apple servers). Please let me know if other people had similar problems. On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:11 PM Adam Nemet <anemet at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > Thanks for the update it has some nice new features. There is one issue I > am seeing since the update though. I

Would it make sense to officially have phabricator ignore all replies to the email thread, and instead require that all comments are done through phabricator itself? -Krzysztof On 5/25/2016 10:20 AM, James Y Knight via llvm-dev wrote: > Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring > replies. This one seems to be a different issue. > > In the thread

Greetings llvm'ers, I'm working on an update to phabricator that brings our fork significantly closer to the upstream version, thus making maintenance much easier; this will allow us to upgrade more often. Upstream has fixed many issues and introduced new ways to customize the email flow, so a) while rolling out the new version I'll be fiddling with config settings; during that

It seems emails to me were not sent out due to them being held back by sendgrid spam protection. In case somebody else has this problem, this might be something to look into. Best, Tobias On Fri, Jul 14, 2017, at 10:12 AM, Manuel Klimek via llvm-dev wrote: > Phab was down during the night, should be back up now. When phab is down, > emails don't get sent out (all emails get sent out

Just ran into another thread where phabricator is seemingly ignoring replies. This one seems to be a different issue. In the thread "[PATCH] D20337: [MC] Support symbolic expressions in assembly directives", Phabricator seems to have completely ignored all of the replies starting with my (emailed) reply earlier today: "The .s does have a way to carry the location.". Except

On 7/1/14, 12:28 PM, Alp Toker wrote: > Specifically the problem I've been seeing is that people using the website are > unable to CC mailing list-based developers. As a result I don't get copied in on > responses to my review comments, and rarely get any kind of direct mail with > threading. You end up having to dig up historic responses in the mailing list > archive which

On 19 May 2016 at 19:59, James Y Knight via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually > they make it through, but sometimes not. Doesn't seem to be a trivial thing to do: https://secure.phabricator.com/T7358 https://secure.phabricator.com/T5181 cheers, --renato

Does anyone know why phab sometimes misses replies sent by email? Usually they make it through, but sometimes not. For example, a recent email from Rafael (which I got through the llvm-commits list) seems to be addressed to the proper thing @ reviews.llvm.org, yet seems to have never made it onto the website. Not having not seen that response (because I was looking on the website), I ended up

> Dropping replies from the web interface or the mail interface? > Also: does "dropping replies" mean that an email reply doesn't show up in the phab interface? > (that's currently "working as intended", until we find enough time to write a parser for inline > comment replies in mails) I mean that email replies don't always appear in the web interface.

GAH! Sigh.... :( That is indeed what it does. See stripQuotedText in src/applications/metamta/parser/PhabricatorMetaMTAEmailBodyParser.php if anyone's interested in hacking on php code, it looks like it might be fairly straightforward to have it strip only the lines starting with ">" after the "On ... wrote:" line. On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Tim Northover

Hi all, Top-posting replies* to phab emails are now synced to phabriator UI (again!). Note that inline replies are still not synced. *Top-posting reply: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Top-posting Cheers, Eric -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180308/01d8d939/attachment.html>

On 01/07/2014 21:28, Alp Toker wrote: > Specifically the problem I've been seeing is that people using the > website are unable to CC mailing list-based developers. As a result I > don't get copied in on responses to my review comments, and rarely get > any kind of direct mail with threading. You end up having to dig up > historic responses in the mailing list archive

On 11/12/2013 17:01, Manuel Klimek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Daniel Sanders > <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com <mailto:Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>> wrote: > > I'm not getting the error email you mention, but I have noticed it > silently dropping replies (including my own on occasion). I > haven't spotted anything the missing replies

> On 2014-Jun-27, at 11:48, Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > I know you worked hard to make sure that updating a revision doesn't send email unless there is text typed into one of the boxes Manuel, but I think we should by default put some text into a box (and send the

I have seen the "Too many recipients to the message" several times. A limit of 10 includes the patch author and the list leaving just 8 subscribers/reviewers is way too low. Given that these e-mails can be sent only by a Phab. user I'm not sure that spam is a problem at all: A potential spammer would first have to subscribe to Phab. then create a proper diff,... far easier just to

Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> writes: > I'll go ahead and file one though - more and more people are using phab > for llvm, so the problems with it are coming up more and more often. https://secure.phabricator.com/T8269