similar to: [LLVMdev] ANNOUNCEMENT: Removing list prefix

On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more accessible. Tobi

On 28 Jan 2013, at 18:45, Tanya Lattner wrote: > I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. What is the reason for this? It makes it much harder to skim down emails in the inbox and see which ones are related to which list. David

> On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If >> you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more > accessible. > > Tobi Please

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: >> On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> >>> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If >>> you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >>> >>> If you have any questions, please let me know.

On Jan 29, 2013, at 12:11 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: >> On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >>> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >>> >>> If you have any questions, please let me know. >> >> Thanks Tanya,

On 29 Jan 2013, at 10:20, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more

> On Feb 17, 2020, at 10:06 AM, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Tanya, > > Is there a reason for hosting things for review on Google Docs? We currently have both Phabricator and GitHub that work for review of any text-based format. When I click on a Google Docs link, I am asked to agree to a privacy policy that is very vague and I am

On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 9:13 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > On 3 Nov 2016, at 15:55, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > >> I and the other libc++ contributors were all happy to have our code > relicensed under the MIT license (or contribute it under those terms > originally), so there is some pretty clear evidence

On 18 May 2016, at 07:45, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > I do write some Clang/LLVM related articles on my blog[1][2], and I will be happy to write for LLVM’s blog. > > However, I can’t omit bike-shedding :) > > Forgive me my directness, but current blog doesn’t look like something close to 2016. > > The

Danny, lab.llvm.org has offered to host the buildbot master and therefore would relieve you of your duty to keep updating it. Are you ok with this? Thanks, Tanya On Oct 7, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > The machine exists, it is running, i have not had time to put buildbot > back on it and download the llvm config. > If you want to set up the buildbot config on it, i'm

Bill, > Hi Pawel, > > Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). Sure. But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please fill me on the details. For the 3.2 release I will need: - to know how to build it seems to be covered here

Sure, i'm fine with it :) On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Tanya Lattner <lattner at apple.com> wrote: > Danny, > > lab.llvm.org has offered to host the buildbot master and therefore would relieve you of your duty to keep updating it. Are you ok with this? > > Thanks, > Tanya > > On Oct 7, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Daniel Berlin wrote: > >> The machine exists,

> On May 18, 2016, at 12:59 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > On 18 May 2016, at 07:45, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi everybody, >> >> I do write some Clang/LLVM related articles on my blog[1][2], and I will be happy to write for LLVM’s blog. >> >> However, I can’t

hello list, i have a small question regarding the imq patch from www.linuximq.net by default it makes only 2 devices. how can i add interfaces (imqX)? applying the patch to a linux kernel doesn''t let me build it as a module. thanks in advance, adrian _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc

On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 2:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi Tanya, > > On 18/02/2020 00:56, Tanya Lattner wrote: > > I understand not everyone wants to use Google docs which was why I gave > an option to reply via email as well. My intention on using Google docs is > really just based on my experience using it for docs that span

On 28 Nov 2012, at 17:02, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> 14116 - Inliner incorrectly combines cleanup and catch landing pads > > I think this one can be moved out as a release blocker. Too much debate and no action on the bug in over a month. This bug means that we can't compile at anything over -O1, or we get code that does the wrong thing (e.g. terminate instead of catching an

On 28 Nov 2012, at 19:41, Tanya Lattner wrote: > So why isn't this caught by any of the regression testing (testsuite) if it nothing above -O1 can be compiled? I assume you mean for your project? Any Objective-C on non-Apple platforms that uses cleanups (including those Clang inserts for blocks) breaks in certain cases with inlining. There are also some cases in C++, and cases in LTO (or

On Nov 13, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <pawel at 32bitmicro.com> wrote: > Bill, > >> Hi Pawel, >> >> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). > > Sure. > > But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please

On 20 Aug 2013, at 10:35, Benjamin Kramer <benny.kra at gmail.com> wrote: > Seems to be a known bug in SVN 1.8.0, can you try upgrading to 1.8.1 or downgrading to 1.7? Downgrading to 1.7.x means that I can't access my local repo, since there is no svn downgrade. Upgrading to 1.8.1 gives: svn: E175002: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'https://theraven at

On 27 May 2015, at 17:56, Reid Kleckner <rnk at google.com> wrote: > > I think I found the problem: > https://opia.illinois.edu/content/targeted-attack-protection-tuning > > UIUC is apparently rewriting HTML links in emails to redirect through urldefense.proofpoint.com. This is visible in my version of Rui's email. Thanks for the investigation. Can we turn this off?