I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you, Tanya
On 28 Jan 2013, at 18:45, Tanya Lattner wrote:> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. > > If you have any questions, please let me know.What is the reason for this? It makes it much harder to skim down emails in the inbox and see which ones are related to which list. David
Tanya Lattner
2013-Jan-28 18:59 UTC
[LLVMdev] (CORRECTION) Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: Removing list prefix (llvm-commits only)
On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:53 AM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> On 28 Jan 2013, at 18:45, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. > > What is the reason for this? It makes it much harder to skim down emails in the inbox and see which ones are related to which list.Sorry, I need more caffeine this morning. Correction! I meant to say that I'm removing [llvm-commits] only from the prefix and LLVMDev will stay for now. This is just a notification to the LLVMDev list. -Tanya
On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote:> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. > > If you have any questions, please let me know.Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more accessible. Tobi
On 29 Jan 2013, at 10:20, Tobias Grosser wrote:> On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more accessible.What are the exact list headers that match the lists correctly? Just matching the list addess in to or cc field does not work as it has the following problems: 1) bcc would still not math the filter 2) both copies of a reply that comes to both own address and list would match the list filter.
> On 01/28/2013 07:45 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: >> I will be removing the list prefix "LLVMDev" from the subject line. If >> you are filtering by this, please use the list headers instead. >> >> If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Thanks Tanya, this makes the subject lines of the commits a lot more > accessible. > > TobiPlease let me state my opinion against this change. Due to the heavy traffic on LLVM mailing lists, one needs some kind of filtering to keep only the relevant emails in the inbox. Since my ISP's email server doesn't support any server-side email filtering, I used to filter the e-mails visually. It was easy to ignore emails with the subject prefixed with LLVM or cfe (or both). Right now I can only see 200 emails in my inbox and I cannot distinguish between them. I personally also preferred the file names in the subject, since that allowed me to visually filter the commits in my areas. However, if we all start prefixing the commit messages with the area (as some already do), this problem is gone. Nuno
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] how to turn off conversion of add's into or's (in address calculations)
- [LLVMdev] why dummy asserting base/interface class virtual methods instead of pure virtual methods?
- [LLVMdev] Loads/Stores and MachineMemOperand
- [LLVMdev] Register allocation marking spills (Re: NumLoads/NumStores for linearscan?)
- [LLVMdev] Loads/Stores and MachineMemOperand