similar to: [LLVMdev] Testing canaries

Ok, this is done and seems to work. As far as Chris's request for getting "key directory" paths into the commit message, I thought about working on it, but in the end I'm not sure why we shouldn't just encourage people to self-tag their leading commit line with some sort of standard key ([MC], [Target/Mips], whatever). - Daniel On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Daniel

Yup, I didn't either. I went ahead and hacked up a copy with that change and am switching it over now. - Daniel On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > I'm a bit hesitant to just hack up the installed copy of svnmailer, are > we > > sure this patch hasn't been dealt with in an upstream

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > Sebastian Pop wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > > Hi Sebastion, > > > > > > I've attached the current configuration file from the server. > > > > > > I'm not sure how far you want to go down the "trying to get

Daniel Dunbar wrote: > I'm a bit hesitant to just hack up the installed copy of svnmailer, are we > sure this patch hasn't been dealt with in an upstream version? I don't see that change in the last dev version: http://storage.perlig.de/svnmailer/svnmailer-1.1.0-dev-r1373.tar.bz2 > > -diff_command = /usr/bin/diff -u -L %(label_from)s -L %(label_to)s > > %(from)s

Sebastian Pop wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Daniel Dunbar wrote: > > Hi Sebastion, > > > > I've attached the current configuration file from the server. > > > > I'm not sure how far you want to go down the "trying to get realize nice > > summary path" lines, but if svn_mailer somehow supported running an > > external script to

Hi, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > > >> [cfe-commits] r167788 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp test/Analysis/dead-stores.cpp > >> > >> with > >> > >> [cfe-commits] r167788 - Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements. >

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > Hi Sebastion, > > I've attached the current configuration file from the server. > > I'm not sure how far you want to go down the "trying to get realize nice > summary path" lines, but if svn_mailer somehow supported running an > external script to process the commit and come up with the path that would > be ideal for

Hi Sebastion, I've attached the current configuration file from the server. I'm not sure how far you want to go down the "trying to get realize nice summary path" lines, but if svn_mailer somehow supported running an external script to process the commit and come up with the path that would be ideal for integration on the server. - Daniel On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM,

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> >>> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>>> >>>> Ok,

On Jan 26, 2013, at 9:49 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28

Is anybody working on this? If not, where might one start looking to fix this? -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of David Blaikie Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:52 PM To: Sebastian Pop Cc: cfe-dev at cs.uiuc.edu Developers; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: put commit messages in *-commits

On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri,

Bump for something that would be good to do. On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > David Blaikie wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Sebastian Pop wrote: >> >> Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> > I'm in favor of

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 6:22 AM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 01/26/2013 01:41 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >> >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013

On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 10:07 AM Daniel Dunbar <daniel_dunbar at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 8, 2017, at 7:32 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ideally/the better integration with Buildbot would be to have these > outputs referenced as "associated files" (it's been a while since I played > with buildbot - I remember finding this

Jordan Rose wrote: > +John C and Daniel, who have access to the servers. > > Way back when this thread was first active I asked around off-list where this needs to happen, and Daniel and Tanya said this (respectively): > > >> I'd prefer to stick with using either svn-mailer or svnnotify, as those are the ones we use in other places. svnnotify in particular is very full

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:37 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Eli Bendersky <eliben at google.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:

On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: >> [cfe-commits] r167788 - in /cfe/trunk: lib/Analysis/CFG.cpp test/Analysis/dead-stores.cpp >> >> with >> >> [cfe-commits] r167788 - Fix bad CFG construction bug when handling C++ 'try' statements. >> >> The first gives me just enough information (in my

David Blaikie wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Sebastian Pop <spop at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sebastian Pop wrote: > >> Chris Lattner wrote: > >> > I'm in favor of it. Of course, the truly awesomest thing would be something like: > >> > > >> > [cfe-commits] r167788 - [lib/Analysis] Fix bad CFG

On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >> On 01/26/2013 12:15 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >>> >>> Ok, this is done and seems to work. >>> >>> As far as Chris's request for getting "key