Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, found 728743 in 331.20-1, tagging 728743, tagging 735576 ..."
2013 Dec 12
0
xen-api-libs REMOVED from testing
FYI: The status of the xen-api-libs source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 0.5.2-3.1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/mehdi>
# 10-12-2013; generated with comigrate -c /srv/release.debian.org/britney/code/b2/britney.conf --migrate ocaml --remove xen-api-libs --remove otags --remove
2013 Jul 19
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, tagging 714794, tagging 710035, found 668754 in 0.36-1 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org).
> tags 714794 - moreinfo
Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tags 710035 - moreinfo
Bug #710035
2020 Nov 18
0
CEBA-2020:5006 CentOS 7 kde-workspace BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5006
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5006
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
d6beb9da905c4b24c2f8e52152046e20369cddd4a1f98e7babf6ac1658ced21b kcm_colors-4.11.19-16.el7_9.x86_64.rpm
2005 Oct 10
0
process sigblk
Given the below info: what signal is SigBlk indicating?
THanks,
Jerry
------------
State: S (sleeping)
Tgid: 11542
Pid: 11542
PPid: 1
TracerPid: 0
Uid: 0 0 0 0
Gid: 0 0 0 0
FDSize: 256
Groups: 0 1 2 3 4 6 10
VmSize: 4888 kB
VmLck: 0 kB
VmRSS: 1944 kB
VmData: 692 kB
VmStk: 112 kB
VmExe: 1220 kB
VmLib:
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, usertagging 669005, affects 669005, reopening 668748 ...
2012 Apr 24
0
Processed: user debian-qa@lists.debian.org, usertagging 669005, affects 669005, reopening 668748 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was debian at abeckmann.de).
> usertags 669005 piuparts
Bug#669005: uninstallable on sid (might just need require a rebuild)
There were no usertags set.
Usertags are now: piuparts.
> affects 669005 + shogun-python-static shogun-python-modular
2012 Jan 17
1
Bug#656216: xen-utils-common: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8)
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 4.1.2-1
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2012 Dec 01
1
Bug#694891: xcp-guest-templates: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /usr/lib/xen-common/xapi/CREATE_TEMPLATES_STAMP
Package: xcp-guest-templates
Version: 0.1-4
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts
2012 Nov 26
2
Bug#694429: blktap-dkms: unowned files after purge (policy 6.8, 10.8): /lib/modules/$KVERS/kernel/
Package: blktap-dkms
Version: 2.0.91-1
Severity: important
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean
2012 Jan 13
2
Bug#655714: xcp-squeezed: fails to install due to insserv rejecting the script header
Package: xcp-squeezed
Version: 1.3-13
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to
incorrect dependencies in the init.d LSB header. Some debian notes are
available from at http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selecting
2013 Jan 26
0
Processed: switching email address
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> # bugs with submitter debian at abeckmann.de
> submitter 479445 !
Bug #479445 [gnuplot] gnuplot: wrong line numbers for missing files reported during replot
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>'
> submitter 681568 !
Bug #681568
2013 Oct 31
0
Processed: found 728266 in 2.0.91-2, tagging 728266, severity of 701278 is important, found 728158 in 0.9.0-2 ...
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> found 728266 2.0.91-2
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Marked as found in versions blktap-dkms/2.0.91-2.
> tags 728266 + jessie sid
Bug #728266 [blktap-dkms] Depends on obsolete packages
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> severity 701278 important
Bug #701278 [src:flush] flush: ftbfs with GCC-4.8
Severity set to
2012 Mar 10
1
Bug#663352: xcp-networkd: fails to install
Package: xcp-networkd
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As
per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for
a release, thus the severity.
>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Selecting previously unselected package
2012 Jul 27
1
Samba 3.6.x: smbd receives sigpipe and crashes
Hello,
I've got problems with Samba 3.6.0 up to 3.6.6. Forked smbd processes
are closing unexpectedly and sometimes smbd server exits. (In Samba
3.5.16 everything works).
When invoke smbd from gdb and turn off SIGPIPE passing (by command
"handle SIGPIPE nostop nopass") everything works fine. I found out that
SigBlk flag of forked smbd processes in /proc/*/status is:
2005 Dec 23
4
sshd blocks SIGALRM
Gidday everbody,
We have just found an interesting issue regarding the sshd daemon on our
SuSE system. For some reasons, the /usr/sbin/sshd process blocks SIGALRM as
shown in the /proc/pid/status:
$ cat /proc/`cat /var/run/sshd.init.pid`/status
Name: sshd
State: S (sleeping)
SleepAVG: 0%
[...]
SigPnd: 0000000000000000
ShdPnd: 0000000000000000
SigBlk: 0000000000002000 <-- SIGALRM is
2023 May 23
2
Bug#1036601: xenstore-utils: missing Depends: xen-utils-common
Package: xenstore-utils
Version: 4.17.0+74-g3eac216e6e-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships (or creates)
a broken symlink:
0m15.9s ERROR: FAIL: Broken symlinks:
/usr/bin/xenstore-control -> ../lib/xen-common/bin/xen-utils-wrapper (xenstore-utils)
cheers,
Andreas
2006 Nov 13
2
Bug#398372: xen-utils-common: installation fails: ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to `../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory
Package: xen-utils-common
Version: 3.0.3-0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: makes package uninstallable
Usertags: grid5000
Hi,
During a piuparts run over all the packages in etch, I ran into a
problem with your package:
Setting up xen-utils-common (3.0.3-0-1) ...
ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/udev/rules.d/z60_xen-backend.rules' to
`../xen-backend.rules': No such file or directory
2016 May 27
2
Bug#825580: libxen-dev: broken symlink: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxlutil.so -> libxlutil.so.
Package: libxen-dev
Version: 4.6.0-1+nmu2
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package ships a broken
symlink:
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxlutil.so -> libxlutil.so.
(notice the trailing dot, it is part of the target).
You probably want this target instead:
libxlutil-4.6.so
Andreas
2013 Jul 24
1
Cpus_allowed_list issue in RHEL6.4
Hi All,
I am using RHEL 6.4 on a Dell Server with 32 cores.
But in the Cpus_allowed_list only 30 cores are available. Why is that?
See the snippet from cat /proc/self/status:
Cpus_allowed: 7fff7fff
Cpus_allowed_list: 0-14,16-30
The allowed list is same for the init process as well (see below).
I didn't see this issue, in RHEL 6.2.
Why is that? Is there a way to change it?
-miraj
2009 Oct 02
1
[PATCH libguestfs] build: fix compile error
>From 3a09d409df89d72ca476ed829739b4aacf08735d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <meyering at redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 16:09:19 +0200
Subject: [PATCH libguestfs] build: fix compile error
Link demo scripts with just-build library, not the installed one.
* ocaml/examples/Makefile.am (OCAMLFINDFLAGS): New variable.
(lvs, viewer): Use it.
This fix is based on a suggestion
2005 Dec 26
0
hot keys
Hello.
One thing I have been running under Wine is something called "Express
Scribe", which is rather good gratis software for transcribing audio
material. Up through 0.9.3, the program runs nicely but at install
there are error messages about not being able to install hot keys.
Probably this isn't surprising, so what I am really looking for is
advice on how to work around it.
In