similar to: Bug#717157: blktap-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10

As usual, written and (build-)tested on 2.6.27.4 and made apply to the 2.6.18 tree without further testing. Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com> Index: head-2008-11-04/drivers/xen/blktap/blktap.c =================================================================== --- head-2008-11-04.orig/drivers/xen/blktap/blktap.c 2008-10-01 16:35:04.000000000 +0200 +++

Package: blktap-dkms Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, blktap-dkms FTBFS against linux 3.10-1 from unstable: Cheers, Moritz CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.o In file included from /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/control.c:30:0: /var/lib/dkms/blktap/2.0.91/build/blktap.h:75:41: warning: variably modified ?pending? at file scope [enabled by

Ako ova poruka nije prikazama u cjelini, mo&#158;ete je pogledati na webu.. Dana 15. srpnja 2014. u Saboru je izglasan Novi Zakon o radu! Novi Zakon o radu stupio je na snagu 7. kolovoza 2014. Novo stru??no izdanje! 30% popusta u prednarud??bi! komentar uz svaki pojedini ??lanak, iz kojega ??e ??itatelji mo??i saznati kako se pojedina odredba zakona u praksi primjenjuje,

im using the most recent version of ubuntu and i wanted to run WOW but i have been unable to even configure it due to a lack of text on the configure screen. when i change tabs there is a sudden flash of jumbled texts that immediately subsides. and i am using nvdia drivers for my graphics card. here is what it looks like (title bar got cut off) [Image:

Nav?tivte na?e webov? str?nky infotigra a objevte, jak JEDNA jedin? mal? modr? pilulka m??e do?ivotn? zm?nit VA?I sexu?ln? v?konnost! ? V??en? z?kazn?k! V?deck? testy prok?zaly, ?e TIGRA funguje l?pe ne? jak?koli jin? pilulka. Test na 800 mu??ch ve v?ku 21 a? 80 let prok?zal ohromuj?c? v?sledky: ? 1. A? o 71 % siln?j?? touha

Patrick, there following patches fix xenpaging for me. Granttable handling is incomplete. If a page is gone, a GNTST_eagain should be returned to the caller to inidcate the hypercall has to be retried after a while, until the page is available again. Please review. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > user debian-qa at lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-qa at lists.debian.org (was anbe at debian.org). > tags 714794 - moreinfo Bug #714794 {Done: Gilles Filippini <pini at debian.org>} [release.debian.org] pu: package sikuli/1.0~x~rc3.tesseract3-dfsg1-5+deb7u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 710035 - moreinfo Bug #710035

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 717155 + sid jessie Bug #717155 [iscsitarget-dkms] iscsitarget-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10 Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags 717157 + sid jessie Bug #717157 [blktap-dkms] blktap-dkms: Fails to build against Linux 3.10 Added tag(s) sid and jessie. > tags 717166 + sid jessie Bug #717166 [openswan-modules-dkms]

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com> From: Himanshu Raj <rhim@cc.gatech.edu> [patch 7/9] Guest page hinting: minor fault optimization. On of the challenges of hva is the cost for the state transitions. If the cost gets too big the whole concept of page state information is in question. Therefore it is very important to

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> From: Hubertus Franke <frankeh@watson.ibm.com> From: Himanshu Raj <rhim@cc.gatech.edu> [patch 7/9] Guest page hinting: minor fault optimization. On of the challenges of hva is the cost for the state transitions. If the cost gets too big the whole concept of page state information is in question. Therefore it is very important to

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian Xen Team <pkg-xen-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org> * Package name : blktap-dkms Version : 2.0.90 Upstream Author : Jon Ludlam <jonathan.ludlam at eu.citrix.com> * URL : http://www.xen.org/ * License : GPL-2 Programming Lang: C Description : Xen blktap kernel component DKMS package This package

First, I want to thank Karanbir for the centos extras repo. I have a question about dkms. I have several Dell PowerEdge systems with Centos 4, and kbs-CentOS- Extras and dell-software repos enabled. Is there any possible conflict if I allow yum to update dkms from dell-software instead of kbs-CentOS-Extras? Currently the i386 architecture has version 2.0.11- in dell-software and 2.0.10-1

Hi all, I''d like to look into btrfs code and try some things, so I followed the instructions on the wiki (link below) to setup git and get a dkms build against my kernel. I''m using Ubuntu 10.10 with a 2.6.35 Kernel, which I assume is too old. What version do I need? https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories I''ve followed the guide (skipped

Hey folks, I'd like to get a .deb of the unmodified_drivers put together. I just filed ITP, and I would love to have your help with it. http://wp.colliertech.org/cj/?p=653 I've never built a kernel package before, nor have I used DKMS, so it's going to be a bumpy ride for me. Do any of you have experience with these tools? Have you built the unmodified_drivers modules recently?

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: (not in testing) Current version: 2.0.90-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.90-1 Current version: 2.0.91-1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more

Package: blktap-dkms Version: 2.0.91-1 Severity: normal After an update of the kernel in SID, I have noticed that blktap-dkms didn't automatically rebuild itself when I upgraded my server with a newer kernel version. My understanding is that it should have. Also, doing dpkg-reconfigure blktap-dkms or reinstalling the package did make it rebuild the kernel module. Thomas Goirand (zigo) --

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.91-1 Current version: 2.0.91-2 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more

FYI: The status of the blktap-dkms source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 2.0.91-2 Current version: 2.0.93-0.1 -- This email is automatically generated once a day. As the installation of new packages into testing happens multiple times a day you will receive later changes on the next day. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more

blktap-dkms 2.0.93-0.1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2014-05-07 It is affected by these RC bugs: 742515: blktap-dkms: blktapblktap kernel module failed to build