similar to: Testing recommend, make Install error Re: Nut-upsuser Digest, Vol 116, Issue 10

Hi Charles, I try to do from a new clean installations after reset my server (some changes need it), and now the make install seems to works. Now i going to configure and test it. I attached the logs files from the last run. If i have any other problem I write to the list. Thanks a lot for your help. Have a good day. 2015-02-13 17:45 GMT-06:00 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>: >

Hi Charles, I forgot add attaches.[?] I try to do from a new clean installations after reset my server (some changes need it), and now the make install seems to works. Now i going to configure and test it. I attached the logs files from the last run. If i have any other problem I write to the list. Thanks a lot for your help. Have a good day. 2015-02-13 17:45 GMT-06:00 Charles Lepple

Hi, I need help because I can't install Nut in RedHat EL 6.6 The version of Nut in repository ot RHEL is 2.6.5-2, but doesn't suppor my UPS, Liebert GXT3-200RT. I read that it is supported using Nut version 2.7.2, but I looking all around the web how to install it in my RedHat but I didn't find answers. Follow the guide, I can downlad lasted version stable on web: 2.7.2 Here the

I upgraded an operating system to openSUSE 42.2, kernel 4.4 and recompiled nut 2.7.4. ./configure, make clean and make went well, but make install failed. Make reports Making install in clients make[1]: Entering directory '/mnt/home/rprice/nut/nut-2.7.4.dev/clients' make[2]: Entering directory '/mnt/home/rprice/nut/nut-2.7.4.dev/clients' /usr/bin/mkdir -p '/usr/lib64'

Dear developers, libnutclient has been added as a C++ alternative to libupsclient in 2.7.1. As a result I can't compile nut 2.7.3 with gcc-3.3.6. There wasn't such a problem with nut-2.6.5. Is it possible to add a configuration parameter like '-without-libnutclient' to provide better compatibility with older gcc versions please (since libnutclient is an alternative to

Dear developers, libnutclient has been added as a C++ alternative to libupsclient in 2.7.1. As a result I can't compile nut 2.7.3 with gcc-3.3.6. There wasn't such a problem with nut-2.6.5. Is it possible to add a configuration parameter like '-without-libnutclient' to provide better compatibility with older gcc versions please (since libnutclient is an alternative to

[I took the liberty of replying on nut-upsdev - not many people are using github yet since the NUT repository native format is still SVN.] On Sep 4, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Emilien Kia wrote: > This is a proposal for a new client library which scopes an higher level than the existing libupsclient. > > It needs less dependencies to be compiled than the libupsclient and can be easier to

I have been trying to get Nut working on a system with Fedora 8 i86_64 installed and an APC Smart-UPS USB. The 2.2.0 rpm does not seem to like the USB on this UPS. I have tried compiling the 2.2.2 version, from source, but am getting warnings. I have tried building it on my i386 system (f8 as well) and I get no warnings also the 2.2.0 works fine on that one with a TrippLite Omni 900 LCD via

Hello all, I come back to request comments (and merge) on my pull request of the libnutclient. https://github.com/clepple/nut/pull/2 All previous comments have been addressed (some fixes and documentation). For memory, the libnutclient is an high-level C++ and C client library allowing to dialog with upsd. The addressed model is oriented around devices, variables and commands; unlike

2015-07-06 10:40 GMT+02:00 Sergey Talchuk <tals1975 at gmail.com>: > Dear developers, > > libnutclient has been added as a C++ alternative to libupsclient in 2.7.1. > As a result I can't compile nut 2.7.3 with gcc-3.3.6. There wasn't such a > problem with nut-2.6.5. > > Is it possible to add a configuration parameter like > '-without-libnutclient' to

Hi Charles, Yes, it looks like my g++ does contain STL library which might be just my specific case... However, as a temporary solution I disabled nutclient in Makefile (please find the file attached). And nut-2.7.3 can be compiled now. Thanks, Sergey On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Sergey Talchuk

On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:40 AM, Sergey Talchuk wrote: > Dear developers, > > libnutclient has been added as a C++ alternative to libupsclient in 2.7.1. As a result I can't compile nut 2.7.3 with gcc-3.3.6. What does the error message look like? Does the configure script fail when checking for the C++ compiler, or later on? > There wasn't such a problem with nut-2.6.5. > >

Hi Charles, Thanks for the prompt reply! Errors occur when execute make: /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -MT nutclient.lo -MD -MP -MF $depbase.Tpo -c -o nutclient.lo nutclient.cpp &&\ mv -f $depbase.Tpo $depbase.Plo libtool: compile: g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../include -MT nutclient.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/nutclient.Tpo -c

On 04/04/17 15.19, Arnaud Quette wrote: > > > 2017-04-04 14:18 GMT+02:00 Jon Bendtsen <jon.bendtsen at jonix.dk > <mailto:jon.bendtsen at jonix.dk>>: [cuuuuut] > > there is a Github issue: https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/415 > + a branch with the implementation: > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/tree/upsmon_alarm > > For now: > -

2017-04-04 14:18 GMT+02:00 Jon Bendtsen <jon.bendtsen at jonix.dk>: > On 04/04/17 14.10, Roger Price wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2017, Arnaud Quette wrote: >> >> > [cuuuuut] > > Hi Arnaud, It seems to me that, looking out into the future, there are >> three >> things upsmon needs: >> >> 1. A fall-through <notify type> of

I'm trying to build NUT 2.2.1 on a SunBlade 2000 running Solaris 10 (Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC) It won't compile. I'm not a programmer, so I'm afraid I don't know why... [huge at anubis ~/Prog/nut/nut-2.2.1]: ./configure --with-user=ups --with-group=nutNetwork UPS Tools version 2.2.1 checking build system type... sparc-sun-solaris2.10 checking host system type...

Hi, when building with the WITH_DEV conditional, either `libupsclient.pc' *or* `libupsclient-config' is installed. This is annoying when linking with libupsclient, because you basically have to do the check twice, once using `pkg-config' and once using `libupsclient-config'. Please consider the attached patch, which changes the behavior of `lib/Makefile.am' to install

Hello list, I have explored https://github.com/networkupstools/nut repository and found that Riello UPS added into list of supported UPS. But current package for most distribution it's nut-2.6.5 which doesn't have Riello's models. Do we need to wait next upcoming nut release to get start with Riello? I tried to install from source but stuck: # git clone

Hi, Made a test build of the Testing branch. The problem is that upsmon and upsc is not respecting the revision change of libupsclient.so. It is now libupsclient.so.1, but i get this. /usr/sbin/upsmon: error while loading shared libraries: libupsclient.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory and: upsc: error while loading shared libraries: libupsclient.so.0: cannot

Hello together, after upgrading from nut 2.2.1 to nut 2.2.2, I noticed there's a (new?) libupsclient.so library. On my Redhat based system, f.e. the "upsc" binary links against it and is unhappy as the library is not included in the current RPM file. If you look at the .spec file for Redhat, the libupsclient.* stuff is included in the "nut-devel" package only. The SuSE