similar to: Logic problem in NUT with upscode2 driver

2012/2/6 thomas schorpp <thomas.schorpp at googlemail.com>: > Hi, Hi Thomas, > I want the driver report the battery status from ABM charging controllers > -patch attached- : thanks for your patch. since it introduces a new variable (battery.status.abm), I prefer to step back and think to something useful more widely. thus, I'm thinking about a generic

Hi, Am 13.02.2012 um 18:58 schrieb Arnaud Quette: > 2012/2/6 thomas schorpp <thomas.schorpp at googlemail.com>: >> Hi, > > Hi Thomas, > >> I want the driver report the battery status from ABM charging controllers >> -patch attached- : > > For now, I've tracked your patch here: >

THANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOUTHANKYOU!!!!!! There was a smaller patch posted to the list for lines -1389,9 +1390,10 a couple years ago, it helped some - BUT - it was still buggy. I have a Compaq R3000, I will get this patch integrated pronto and test Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack

On 2/20/2014 6:55 AM, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> Worse, however, is if there's a power failure right near the end of >> the 2-days-off cycle. That happened to me last week - it was a >> short duration 15 second loss - and the upscode2 driver decided it >> needed to issue a forced shutdown. >> >>

On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > Worse, however, is if there's a power failure right near the end > of the 2-days-off cycle. That happened to me last week - it was a > short duration 15 second loss - and the upscode2 driver decided it needed to issue a forced shutdown. > > Very likely this was because upscode2 had decided the batteries > were

----- Doorgestuurd bericht van dkbrig at gmail.com ----- Datum: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:16:06 -0600 Van: Danny <dkbrig at gmail.com> Onderwerp: upscode2.c Aan: adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org Hi, I apologize if you are not the correct person, but I was wanting to submit a bug report for the upscode2.c driver but could not find a way to do that from the NUT website.

I've got a Powerware 5119 RM UPS. driver.list says to use "genericups upstype=20", however I know this UPS supports the UPS Code II protocol, so I wanted to use the upscode2 driver. It took some hacking but finally it works. I'm using NUT 2.4.1 and upscode2 driver version 0.87 (however the latest r2350 version of upscode2.c isn't significantly different, so I think all

On 11/3/2014 9:25 PM, thomas schorpp wrote: > Hi Ted, > > Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: >> > >> Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to >> determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack >> voltage to the logs as such: >> >> --- upslog.c.orig 2012-07-31 10:38:58.000000000

On 7/5/23 03:17AM, Jim Klimov wrote: > Ah, I thought you missed in my earlier reply the part about a bug with debug printouts in 2.8.0 (fixed on master since), > did not comment on that when you replied with quoting... So, for now options are to bump debugging to 3+ or to build > your own in one of many ways possible :\ I think I'm not following you - with debug 3 -->> it

Hi All, I put my Compaq R3000 UPS on NUT. Every once in a while the battery alarm light turns on, on the front of the UPS. Maybe once every couple of days or so. When that happens I get the following output in /var/log/messages: Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: .20 MOUL1 Sep 22 01:51:46 mail upscode2[90734]: Unknown response to UPDS: 0119.20 MOIL1 Sep 22

Ah, I thought you missed in my earlier reply the part about a bug with debug printouts in 2.8.0 (fixed on master since), did not comment on that when you replied with quoting... So, for now options are to bump debugging to 3+ or to build your own in one of many ways possible :\ On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 06:23 Karl Schmidt <karl at lrak.net> wrote: > On 7/4/23 10:01PM, Jim Klimov wrote: >

Normally yes - enable and start the target and the particular services relevant to your setup. For the binary you have from packaging (if not rebuilt as suggested earlier), set debug_min=3 in ups.conf section for upscode2, to currently trade driver viability for some storage traffic with more logs :\ Sorry about that, Jim On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 02:29 Karl Schmidt <karl at lrak.net> wrote:

?Hola, Es más fácil que todo eso... Es que en tu fichero de entrada, la segunda fila son las unidades de las variables que tienes en la primera fila, pero "R" al leerlas las considera como un string que altera la clase de toda la columna cuando ésta es numérica. Simplemente eliminando esa segunda fila, las columnas acaban teniendo la clase que deben..

On 7/4/23 10:01PM, Jim Klimov wrote: > Normally yes - enable and start the target and the particular services relevant to your setup. > > For the binary you have from packaging (if not rebuilt as suggested earlier), set debug_min=3 in ups.conf section for > upscode2, to currently trade driver viability for some storage traffic with more logs :\ > > Sorry about?that, > Jim

Ok, so another apc UPS 3000 complained about bad batteries, and I changed them out from the same order that I'd gotten in a couple of months ago. The APC SmartUPS 3000 started connecting and disconnecting the USB connection. I brought down and up the service, no joy. Finally, after googling, I found a *completely* undocumented way to start apcupsd, that a few years ago someone was told to

> > > > battery.voltage: 16.0 > At that voltage, 5 of the 12 cells are shorted > > output.voltage: 138.0 > too high by about 15 volts > > Wow! That battery is beyond toasted, shoulda been replaced months ago. > And the output voltage is a bit much if its truthfull. > Thanks for the response Gene! I've ordered a replacement unit. I'm not sure about the

Hi Ted, Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > > Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to > determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack > voltage to the logs as such: > > --- upslog.c.orig 2012-07-31 10:38:58.000000000 -0700 > +++ upslog.c 2014-02-20 09:23:14.000000000 -0800 > @@ -50,6 +50,7

Dear Ted, Am 07.11.2014 um 17:47 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: > On 11/3/2014 9:25 PM, thomas schorpp wrote: >> Hi Ted, >> >> Am 04.11.2014 um 04:12 schrieb Ted Mittelstaedt: >>> >> >>> Note that since the UPS relies on the voltage from the battery pack to >>> determine state of charge, it is quite useful to add in the battery pack >>>

My UPS is an Exide NetUPS SE PRC1500i (1500 VA), also known as Powerware 5119, according to Karl Schmidt (http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2005-July/000026.html) also Deltec PowerRite Pro II, and according to http://www.usedups.de/compaq_ups.html also Compaq R3000h. I am not sure if the information in http://www.bps.hu/powerware/model_en.html is to be interpreted as that it was

My UPS is an Exide NetUPS SE PRC1500i (1500 VA), also known as Powerware 5119, according to Karl Schmidt (http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/2005-July/000026.html) also Deltec PowerRite Pro II, and according to http://www.usedups.de/compaq_ups.html also Compaq R3000h. I am not sure if the information in http://www.bps.hu/powerware/model_en.html is to be interpreted as that it was