similar to: Over-alignment of globals?

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:19 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > On 5 July 2017 at 17:51, Luís Marques via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Cool. When I did that on macOS, LDC generated a lot of complaints, > possibly > > because it is assuming mach-o files. I tried changing from > -mtriple=msp430 > > to

Hello, While trying to find out why the LDC compiler refuses to generate object code for MSP430 targets (but generates MSP430 assembly or LLVM IR/bitcode), I came across the following apparent inconsistency. This works: $ clang --target=msp430 -c test.c This doesn't work: $ clang --target=msp430 -S -emit-llvm test.c $ llc -filetype=obj test.ll /opt/msp430/bin/llc: target does not support

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Nicholas Wilson < iamthewilsonator at hotmail.com> wrote: > Luís, try using the -no-integrated-as flag to execute the assembler for > you. > We should probably make that the default for MSP430. > Cool. When I did that on macOS, LDC generated a lot of complaints, possibly because it is assuming mach-o files. I tried changing from -mtriple=msp430

Hello, If you have one or more bytecode files with debug info, how do you generate a native executable still with debug info? I tried, for instance, this: llvm-ld -native -disable-opt -o exec file1.bc file2.bc but it doesn't seem to work. Thanks, Luís

*llvm-project version:dd8a2013dc1804be1b7d9cffacad2e984300bd22* *Instructons to build LLVM+clang:* ``` cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/llvm/workspace/llvm/llvm-project/llvm_install -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT="/home/llvm/workspace/riscv/riscv-tc-20200220/bin/riscv32-unknown-elf"

Hi, I''ve been using rails 3 engines and (at least in my experience) the engine''s application controller is overidden by the app''s application controller. Wouldn''t it be better if the app would just load on top of the engine? I mean that if an engine''s application controller has methods or anything else that does not collide with the stuff defined

Hello everyone. I''m starting with Rails going through the obvious "Getting Started with Rails" guide: http://guides.rubyonrails.org/getting_started.html Everything goes smoothly until the rake db:create command, which returns this strange error message referring to a gem that apparently doesn''t exist: Please install the postgresql adapter: `gem install activerecord-

Hello, Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working on ubuntu 10.04 with pvops kernel and libvirt. However I am having some problems with networking... after initial installation with netinstall image in hvm mode, when I transform the vm in xen pv (via pygrub with the current ubuntu kernel), networking startEd to act weird... Basically I''m not using a network script from xen. I define a

Hello, Finally I managed to get a xen 4.0 working on ubuntu 10.04 with pvops kernel and libvirt. However I am having some problems with networking... after initial installation with netinstall image in hvm mode, when I transform the vm in xen pv (via pygrub with the current ubuntu kernel), networking startEd to act weird... Basically I''m not using a network script from xen. I define a

hello, I am trying to build LLVM with default options. I am getting the following error message after make. [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/metadata.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/module.c.o [100%] Building C object tools/llvm-c-test/CMakeFiles/llvm-c-test.dir/object.c.o [100%] Building C object

Hello, As I can see, recently LLVM switched to using assume bundles to encode alignment information: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG78de7297abe2e8fa782682168989c70e3cb34a5c However, it seems that the ValueTracking cannot understand the new format. As an example, consider compilation of the following reproducer with clang-11 (old assume format) and clang-trunk (assume bundles): #include

Hi, Is there any reason why helpers cannot render partials? I would like to do something like this in the layout: <body> <%= magic_header %> <%= yield %> </body> and then have a magic_header helper def magic_helper ...do some magic... render partial: "magic_helper" end Why is this wrong? Cumprimentos, Luís Ferreira -- You received this

Hi, for a backup program I have to find all differing files (including metadata) in two snapshots taken from the same subvolume. Having looked at the find-new command I thought about this process: 1. Get the two transids when the two snapshots were created. 2. Query modifications to the original subvolume between the two transids. Is the general process corrent or have I overseen

The domU is using pygrub to boot its own 2.6.18.8-xen kernel. It can be booted successfully under 2.6.18.8-xen dom0 and xen 3.3.1. However when upgrade dom0 to 2.6.32.15 and xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre, the domU can not boot with tapdisk. I am wondering it is something related to the blktap driver. *When using tap:aio:* PATH/disk.img in domU disk configuration, the boot process hanged at a prompt: XENBUS:

The domU is using pygrub to boot its own 2.6.18.8-xen kernel. It can be booted successfully under 2.6.18.8-xen dom0 and xen 3.3.1. However when upgrade dom0 to 2.6.32.15 and xen 4.0.1-rc3-pre, the domU can not boot with tapdisk. I am wondering it is something related to the blktap driver. *When using tap:aio:* PATH/disk.img in domU disk configuration, the boot process hanged at a prompt: XENBUS:

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Luís Mendes <luis.p.mendes at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for alI these individual emails, but I think is more readable > this way, by having each independent information in a separate email. > > I also have these additional cards that I can try: Gefoce GT 1030 and > Geforce GTX 1050 Ti. > > I have tried Geforce GT 1030 and it is working

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:17 AM Jorg Brown via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:50 AM kamlesh kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Hi Devs, >> Consider testcase here >> https://godbolt.org/z/qHZzqw >> When optimization is O1 or above it produces unoptimized code >> because it

# Overview and background RISC-V is a free and open instruction set architecture. It is a modular specification, with a range of standard extensions (e.g. floating point, atomics, etc). New standard extensions are developed through RISC-V Foundation working groups. The specifications for such extensions (e.g. vector and bit manipulation) are publicly available, but are still in flux and won't

Hm. I assumed that JumpThreading would be the primary factor in optimizing code like this. Guess not. I'll need to look into SimplifyCFG to see what prevents it from doing the same thing to the other loop: https://godbolt.org/z/F6NjdG On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 3:09 PM Michael Kruse <llvmdev at meinersbur.de> wrote: > I assumed the LLVM-IR behind the godbolt link represented the C code

I am not convinced this is a jump-threading issue, but in the domain of ScalarEvolution. ScEv would need to find out which of the exits are taken or whether it loops infinitely. One can see that it exits after 10000 iterations, but ScalarEvolution cannot tell: https://godbolt.org/z/dCqdvv Michael Am Mo., 3. Feb. 2020 um 11:56 Uhr schrieb Karl Rehm <klrehm123 at gmail.com>: > > Well