similar to: belkin Q:

All, I just bought a Belkin F6C1100-UNV and am trying to get it to work with NUT. I have tried many drivers ( "belkin", "belkinunv", "genericups upstype=4", and "genericups upstype=7", "bestups", "fentonups"). None of them seem to work. Does anyone have any experience with this device? If there is some utility that you all use to

For the record, I was able to get the following working: Device: Belkin F6C1500-TW-RK Driver: belkin I tried the "belkinunv", which I use for my F6C1100-UNV, but it didn't work. At least there was a driver that worked! :-) Feel free to add it to the list of "tested" configs. Thanks, Dave ---------------------------------------------------------- Are Your Friends

Hi, it'd be great if you could update the documentation on the website that some models of the Belkin -UNV series will only work with the megatec(_usb) drivers. I wasted a lot of time on trying to get it to work with the wrong drivers, and would like to spare others the pain :-). Thanks, ~David P.S. Some forum post said that the stable megatec drivers don't work 100% with the belkin UPS,

Hi, it'd be great if you could update the documentation on the website that some models of the Belkin -UNV series will only work with the megatec(_usb) drivers. I wasted a lot of time on trying to get it to work with the wrong drivers, and would like to spare others the pain :-). Thanks, ~David P.S. Some forum post said that the stable megatec drivers don't work 100% with the belkin UPS,

Hello, all, I had been using NUT's Ubuntu package (64 bit) with no problems until upgrading to Ubuntu 11.04. Now, I get the following message when I try usbhid-ups: $ sudo /lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a mybelkin Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.35 (2.6.0) USB communication driver 0.31 Can't claim USB device [050d:1100]: could not detach kernel driver from interface 0: Operation not

Hi, I've been fighting with trying to get a Belkin Universal model F6C800-UNV to work with NUT. The error I am getting is as follows: ---------------------------------------------- * Starting UPS drivers ... Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.0.0 Network UPS Tools - Belkin 'Universal UPS' driver 0.06 (2.0.0) tcgetattr(/dev/ups): Inappropriate ioctl for device Driver failed

Hi Arjen My apologies fro drifting off topic in the other mailing list...:-) On the bottom of the Belkin UPS unit - is the model number: F6C120auUNV The "au" is for Australia I think. "man belkinunv" states that F6C120-UNV is supported - and I assumed that the "au" would not prevent this. I plugged in the USB to gather the information you requested. My intention

Zaid, I have a Belkin F6C800-UNV which has both a serial and USB connector. The serial connection is already working with the Belkinunv driver. I will connect via the USB and then compare both sets of variables. This should allow me to correlate and shed some light on the meaning of many of Belkin's non-standard "Usage" descriptors. With this information, it should be very easy

Greetings all; I pulled a Belkin F6C100-4 into the shop this afternoon, deader than a door nail. Out of service for about a year because (I'm assuming here) that the cooling fan stopped and cooked what little remaining life there may have been out of the batteries, which had swelled so badly I had to split its frame to get them out. They are also in the under 1 volt per 12 volt pack

well, now that I have moved to dovecot, I'm not getting any spam... in fact, I'm not getting e-mail at all. default_mail_env =mbox:~/IMap2/:INBOX=/var/spool/mail/%u when I first tried to access my inbox, I was told I had permission problems: Aug 14 17:47:22 harvee imap(esj): open(/var/spool/mail/esj.lock) failed: Permission denied Aug 14 17:47:22 harvee imap(esj): file_lock_dotlock()

figures. Converted over to maildir today. Procmail is a piece of cake once I managed to pride out of its cold dead fingers the essential tiny bit of documentation I needed. But I'm having a problem with my nested directories. I have a directory called incoming sort my incoming mail. The conversion utility created a bunch of files called incoming.<stuff> and 1 file is visible

I recently installed NUT 2.2.1 and set it up with a Belkin F6C100-UNV. I can monitor it via serial (belkinunv) or USB (usbhid-ups) cable, and both do seem to work fine, but I would prefer USB to avoid having to add a PCI serial card to the machine. I had to unplug something else to try it with a serial cable. Using 'belkinunv', there's a "-x wait" option: [ from

I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver

I just bought a pair of Belkin USB UPSes -- F6C1200-UNV and F6C550-AVR -- and installed the latest version of nut under Ubuntu 7.04. I'm using the F6C1200-UNV. My system does see the device; dmesg says [ 82.718428] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 2 [ 82.941189] usb 2-2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 83.036825] usbcore: registered new driver

Hi I'm sending this to you as it appears that you are the person who looks after and/or supervises the code for NUT's Belkin drivers. I'm using the address you use for the Nut-upsdev mailing list ( selinger at mathstat.dal.ca ). Anyway... I have a Belkin Universal UPS and, having just upgraded my Fedora Core system from 4 to 5 and had to go back through the system RC files

Red Hat 8.0 stock dovecot 99.10 for a variety of reasons, I decided to cut over to dovecot this morning. I extracted all of my mailboxes from mbx purgatory back to mbox purgatory, set up dovecot and proceed to get authentication failures. (am using simple password based authentication either direct or through pam) I turned authentication verbosity on and got: Aug 14 11:51:38 harvee dovecot:

a customer of mine needs a UPS capable of supporting a small server in his office. Obviously, nut is a good thing for him for clean shutdown etc. especially with the crappy quality power in his office condo. I wanted to purchase an MGE UPS but it looks like they purchased APC and are now flogging that product line. Now, I've never been happy with APC. I have an APC 3000 (sans

I have a new Belkin F6C900-UNV. I see that it's not listed in belkin-hid.c The VendorID is 0x050d like all the Belkin UPSes, and the ProductID is 0x0900. I haven't had a chance to actually test the development version of nut yet, since I'm running Fedora Core 6, which still has nut 2.0.3. `newhidups -DD -a myups` gives the error of: Checking device (050D/0900) (001/002) - VendorID:

I just moved my UPS over from serial to USB and found that I needed to add it to the hotplug USB list to make things work. Belkin F6C120-UNV - Bus 002 Device 004: ID 050d:0912 Belkin Components It seems to be working OK on 2.0.4 with newhidups. Attached is a patch which I think should add the appropriate device id's in the right places to the trunk code. Jon -------------- next part

Hi Arjen 2007/7/28, Arjen de Korte <adkorte-guest at alioth.debian.org>: > Author: adkorte-guest > Date: Sat Jul 28 16:45:04 2007 > New Revision: 1029 > > Log: > Add Belkin F6C1200-UNV (older model) to supported devices. > > Apparently this is (internally) identical to the F6C1100-UNV. Not surprisingly, they also share the same productid (1100). It also seems to come