similar to: LLVM installation on Ubuntu 20.04

> On 21/08/2020 07:18 Plutocrat <plutocrat at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 21/08/2020 02.53, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on? Focal?Fossa?(20.04 LTS) ? > > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade > > Not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you ran the "sudo

Hi, is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on Focal Fossa (20.04 LTS) ? I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade Hans -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20200820/b9b00da0/attachment.html>

The wiki: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required_to_Build_Samba Debian / Ubuntu These 2 packages are not available for 18.04 but are for 16.04 python-gpgme python3-gpgme Does this mean you can't build on 18.04? I assume so. I assume this is okay: Note, selecting 'perl-modules-5.26' instead of 'perl-modules' -Barry Adkins

Hi, I have been following the KaleidoscopeJIT chapters and I have found that the code might not be up to date with the current LLVM version. Is anyone aware of the supported versions of LLVM? Best, Anshil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200301/00255373/attachment.html>

Hi, I am trying to run the toy example provided on http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/BuildingAJIT1.html. However, I am running into a file not found error for llvm/ExecutionEngine/Orc/Core.h. Meanwhile other llvm headers seem to link properly. Can someone help me out, please? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Anshil Gandhi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 21/08/2020 02.53, spamvoll at googlemail.com wrote: > is anyone using the "Bionic (18.04 LTS)" packages on? Focal?Fossa?(20.04 LTS) ? > I'm not sure if its working after the upgrade Not quite sure what you're saying here, but if you ran the "sudo do-release-upgrade -d" command, then it will have upgraded your dovecot packages to the current version of Ubuntu

Hi, sorry I should be more specific. I'm on Ubuntu 18.04 and using the latest packages from repo.dovecot.com But these are only available for bionic, not focal. So I'm not sure if the bionic packages are working under focal. I did not notice that ubuntu original packages are on 2.3.7 now. So worst thing will be that after the upgrade to focal i need to downgrade to 2.3.7 original ubuntu

Hi! I'm a new LLVM user. I want to start using the LLVM System v2.3. However, I don't want to spend all my time hunting, pecking, downgrading, and/or upgrading packages to get LLVM v2.3 running. I was wondering which Linux distrubutions(FC7, Ubuntu, NetBSD, etc) have required the least effort out of the box to start running LLVM v2.3. tia, Bernardo Elayda -------------- next part

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 4 december 2018 10:13 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Required to Build Samba > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:24:30 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 09:25:16 +0200 "L.P.H. van Belle via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hai, > > Hmm.. Bummer.. > I just discovered the debian package dont have the vfs_nfs4acl > include in the build. > > And because of that it's not in my packages. I'll have a look into > it, see what i can make of it. > That is odd, it

Hai Barry, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Barry D. Adkins via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 4 december 2018 5:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Required to Build Samba > > The wiki: > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Package_Dependencies_Required > _to_Build_Samba > >

Hi maximilian, the problem of MUTproble is happened here for me, and the patch is working fine, should be helpful anyway. which mode you used? router, switch or HUB? thanks PHB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/attachments/20200402/fb3597ed/attachment.html>

Hi all, I've noticed several patches that were updated overnight UK time where the following message was produced by the Phabricator linter check: "clang-format-diff not found in user's PATH; not linting file." I'm guessing that something has gone wrong on whatever bot does this? James -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

*llvm-project version:dd8a2013dc1804be1b7d9cffacad2e984300bd22* *Instructons to build LLVM+clang:* ``` cmake -G Ninja -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/home/llvm/workspace/llvm/llvm-project/llvm_install -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="Release" -DDEFAULT_SYSROOT="/home/llvm/workspace/riscv/riscv-tc-20200220/bin/riscv32-unknown-elf"

On 1 Apr 2020, at 22:14, Greg Troxel <gdt at lexort.com> wrote: > > I think you need to use tcpdump and turn up firewall debugging. sngrep is your friend …My bet is UDP vs TCP on firewall rules :-) Mark -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hallo, I am currently installing XEN on an ARM64 EFI machine. (Debian Testing), Therefore, I installed the following packages: __________________________________________________________________ root at armbox:/etc# dpkg -l "xen*" | awk '/^ii/ {print $2 "\t\t" $3}' xen-hypervisor-4.6-arm64 4.6.0-1+nmu2 xenstore-utils 4.6.0-1+nmu2 root at

Hello, I downloaded the LLVM 10 release for windows and noticed, that the LLVM-C.dll for x86 has a size of 9kb, which seems strangely small. Both, the dll for x86 and x64, have no export directory. It is not possible to link them statically to Delphi code or call GetProcAddress on them. I do remember that this worked initially when https://reviews.llvm.org/D56774 was done when compiling the dll

Hi llvm-dev, I have a patch open for review that removes waymarking https://reviews.llvm.org/D77144. This patch removes waymarking and replaces it with storing a pointer to the User in the Use. when compiling the CTMark tests of the test suite, this give an average of +1.8% max memory use and -1.1% compile time. Removing Waymarking also simplifies the code of Use and User. Any thought?

Desired flow looks like: Dovecot ---------------------> Postfix --> Relay Server -? Dovecot <-- LMTP/LDA <-- Postfix <---------------------? Top part of that flow works fine - a message will get to the relay server and it will be send back to the postfix for a local delivery but then it will start to loop back to the relay server instead hand over to LMTP/LDA. For some reason

Greetings, I have written a C program that runs on Windows servers and does overhead and reporting for backup administration. The program calls rsync for the actual data copy function. It copies data from a remote system to a local drive and that works fine. However, I have recently made changes to copy the data to a mapped drive on a NAS device instead of the local drive. The changes work