similar to: LLD bug causing objcopy ELF to binary generation to create large binaries

Hi Andrew, Thanks for the background and context. "In your issue, just to clarify, is the ELF output from LLD also "large", or is it just the output from the llvm-objcopy operating on that ELF that is "large"? Do you have a simple sample to demonstrate this issue?" The ELF size is actually smaller, compared to what was generated from LLVM 7.x. (~900Kb vs

Respected Sir I tried the strucchange My data is attached. However I tried the attached commands (last save.txt) to perform Bai Perron 2003... I t worked well but in the end it is giving warning that overlapping confidence interval... I am not sure how to proceed... Please Help Me Thanking You Ayanendu Sanyal -- Please have a look at our new mission and contribute into it (cut and paste the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Single byte buffer overflow in realpath(3) Category: core Module: libc Announced:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Single byte buffer overflow in realpath(3) Category: core Module: libc Announced:

Hi, It there a way to use rsync from windows server, so it will pull data on NFS through UNIX rsync server? Thanks, Oren Mark Intel - Israel Engineering Computing ISEC Data & Application Hosting oren.mark@intel.com (+) 972-4-865-5987 iNET: 465-5987 --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain

Dear all, Do you have come acrross with this issue. My ss7 link get fluctuating. It use chan_ss7 version 1.0.95-beta. I have 8 E1s running on a DL380 server. This enable to have calls from sip to ss7 and vice versa. However ss7 links are not stable. linkset siuc, link l1, schannel 1, sls 0, NOT_ALIGNED, rx: 1, tx: 2/4, sentseq/lastack: 127/127, total 4034145216, 4031118560 linkset siuc, link

John R Pierce wrote: > On 3/16/2017 11:12 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I'm still trying to find a video capture card that won't crash Dell >> servers, and ran across a Blackmagic BDLKDUO2 DeckLink Duo 2. It claims >> to support Linux. I'm also seeing, in the few non-Blabkmagic or sales >> pages I can find, that they like "binary blobs". I

(list admin, please cancel the same post from my other email address -- forgot to change it on first submission) I need to setup QoS on a linux router/firewall I maintain. I spent 10 hours reading everything I could find on QoS/HTB/iproute2 and came up with what I thought made sense for my situation. So I deployed it and BOOM! KERNEL PANIC! Not what I was expecting... now the debugging begins.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: > > On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > > For .debug_* in object files: > > > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > > > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > > all

In https://groups.google.com/g/generic-abi/c/i2Xio-47QdQ (you need to join the group before making a post) Cary Coutant raised yet another idea: whether we can use ".debug64" as the section prefix. I like the idea because of: * It is immediately obvious whether DWARF64 is used and whether DWARF32 is used along with DWARF64. * In a relocatable link mixing DWARF32 and DWARF64 sections,

Thinking about it, it would probably be wise to raise this discussion on the DWARF mailing list too. They might want to put an addendum in the spec/DWARF wiki/somewhere appropriate along the lines of "ELF support for DWARF64", which can be retroactively applied to existing standards. The committee may also have some thoughts on how tools are expected to work with DWARF64 and DWARF32

On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > For .debug_* in object files: > > DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) > DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 > > In LLD, we will need to allow mixed SHT_PROGBITS and SHT_DWARF64. If > all input sections are SHT_DWARF64, the output section type probably > should also be SHT_DWARF64. > If mixed, SHT_PROGBITS. I am

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:29 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:24 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:17 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:05 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: >

I was thinking about whether I liked the section name idea myself. I think a slight refinement could be to have linkers combine .debug and .debug64 sections into one output section (in non -r links), so that end consumers (debuggers etc) don't have to worry about it. However, conformance is still a concern to me as we cannot really retrofit the existing standard versions, and the section names

I would like to have your comments regarding: 1) drivers/rhino.c ------------------ The following patch addresses some problems in drivers/rhino.c. Or that is what I think. I don't use this hardware. The patch: 1. Eliminates some usefulness definitions. 2. It removes code that evaluate the time. I can't see how the code actually does useful work. 3. The

On 2020-11-17, Igor Kudrin wrote: > >On 17.11.2020 14:05, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >>> >>>On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>>>For .debug_* in object files: >>>> >>>>DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >>>>DWARF64 ->

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-03:08.realpath Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Single byte buffer overflow in realpath(3) Category: core Module: libc Announced:

Hi, On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 10:54 AM, Simon Atanasyan <simon at atanasyan.com> wrote: >> As far as I understand now it is impossible to generate ELF object >> file with relocation sections using yaml2obj tool. I plan to support >> ELF relocations in the yaml2obj. Does anybody work

Hello there. I tried make update using the following stable-supfile: *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 *default delete use-rel-suffix and my two nearest Russian CVS mirrors showed no changes in realpath. Heck, I downloaded the patch and said in /usr/src: # patch < realpath.patch so it was rejected. Then I looked into realpath.c's revision and

On 17.11.2020 14:05, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:42 PM Igor Kudrin <ikudrin at accesssoftek.com> wrote: >> >> On 14.11.2020 3:42, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: >>> For .debug_* in object files: >>> >>> DWARF32 -> SHT_PROGBITS (unchanged) >>> DWARF64 -> SHT_DWARF64 or SHT_GNU_DWARF64 >>> >>> In LLD, we