similar to: llvm-link has no --allow-multiple-definition

Hi Eli, I know the page, and the only mentioning about LTO or link time optimization I found is the option PassManagerBuilder::EP_FullLinkTimeOptimizationLast - and nobody knows how this works (and asked about it on this list too before with no reply), and the author who wrote that part in the llvm code at Redhat did not reply to a question how to actually use it. And there is no example code or

HI Eli, that sounds like the -mllvm option would be a good a mention in the WritingAnLLVMPass document ;-) Two further questions for this and I am keeping this on the list so other people have pointers to this if they struggle with the same thing: 1. Does this require to use lld? (I am sure it is, just to clarify, for the very low chance that it would also work with gnu ld and the llvm gold

Hi Craig, On 03.07.19 17:33, Craig Topper wrote: > Don't the CreateICmp calls return a Value* with an i1 type? But then > they are added to an i8 type? Not sure that works.  I had that initially: auto cf = IRB.CreateICmpULT(Incr, ConstantInt::get(Int8Ty, 1)); auto carry = IRB.CreateZExt(cf, Int8Ty); Incr = IRB.CreateAdd(Incr, carry); it makes no difference to the generated assembly

Hello, I have an optimisation issue in an llvm IR pass - the issue being that unnecessary instructions are generated in the final assembly (with -O3). I want to create the following assembly snippet: mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1] add dl,0x1 adc dl,0x0 mov BYTE PTR [rsi+rdi*1],dl however what is created is (variant #1): mov dl,BYTE PTR [rsi+rdx*1] add dl,0x1 cmp

Hi, I looked through the documentation and source and am unable to find a way: in an IR pass on basic blocks for (auto &F : M) for (auto &BB : F) { .... } I want to access the current address of the basic block. It does not need to be the exact address of the BB, a few instructions down of that BB is fine as well. basically the same that I could do with an "leaq

Hi, I just spent 4 hours trying to find a way to get the name of the resolver function of a ifunc definition ... :-( and with all that time I didnt event get far: for (GlobalIFunc &IF : M.ifuncs()) { StringRef ifunc_name = IF.getName(); Constant *r = IF.getResolver(); But how do I get to the (Function*) or function name of the resolver from there? I tried everything with the Constant

I searched the doxygen documentation and could not find a solution to my task: In a ModulePass running at EP_OptimizerLast, if I have a function F like in: bool Foo:runOnModule(Module &M) { LLVMContext &C = M.getContext(); for (auto &F : M) { // magic here if I want to know from which function (callee) each function is called - how can I do this? (so that I e.g. have

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz> wrote: > Hi, > > On 11/22/2017 07:30 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz > > <mailto:jiri.slezka at slu.cz>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am trying realize why is exporting of vm to export storage on

What about mounting over nfs instead of the fuse client. Or maybe libgfapi. Is that available for export domains On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 3:48 AM Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz> wrote: > On 11/24/2017 06:41 AM, Sahina Bose wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz > > <mailto:jiri.slezka at slu.cz>>

On 11/24/2017 06:41 AM, Sahina Bose wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz > <mailto:jiri.slezka at slu.cz>> wrote: > > Hi, > > On 11/22/2017 07:30 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 5:22 PM Ji?? Sl??ka <jiri.slezka at slu.cz <mailto:jiri.slezka at slu.cz> > >

Hello If you use Gluster as FUSE mount it's always slower than you expect it to be. If you want to get better performance out of your oVirt/Gluster storage, try the following: - create a Linux VM in your oVirt environment, assign 4/8/12 virtual disks (Virtual disks are located on your Gluster storage volume). - Boot/configure the VM, then use LVM to create VG/LV with 4 stripes (lvcreate -i

Hi all. I'm having problems trying to suspend/hibernate my Dell Latitude D810 Laptop. Basically I have an ATI X600 videographics and SATA harddrive and run httpd and mysqld daemons on it. I use fglrx (ATI propietary drivers) and the open too with no success. I tried with 1 and 2 screens configurations with no success. I tried with CA and/or with battery with no success. I need some help

Hi - I am getting different results when I run the numerical integrator function lsoda (odesolve package) on a Mac and a PC. I am trying to simulating a system of 10 ODE's with two exogenous pulsed inputs to the system, and have had reasonably good success with many model parameter sets. Under some parameter sets, however, the simulations fail on the Mac (see error message below). The

Hello all. Again I call upon the greats of this mailing list to help me with an issue related to MEMDISK - notably when paired with various Dell OptiPlex and Latitude systems. The issue presented itself sometime ago and I best dealt with it by remaining with version 3.83 of the SYSLINUX package. But valuing the improved changes fostered by newer versions, I would prefer to move forward with

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ______________________________________________________________________________ SuSE Security Announcement Announcement of new security tools from SuSE ______________________________________________________________________________ Please note, that that we provide this information on an "as-is" basis only.

Today I found myself in need of a laptop to run Centos on. And that simple statement led to an all-day odyssey. My original plan was to purchase a laptop and install Centos 6 on it. I went to Staples and tried booting it on every model of laptop that they had in the store. They all come with Windows 8 installed, and for the edification of anyone who doesn't know this (I didn't until

I am trying to monkey-patch the ActiveRecord::Base class to incorporate a generic search class method so that it can be used by all model classes which need this functionality. Since model classes directly inherit from ActiveRecord::Base and unlike controllers and helpers, do not have an ancestor class defined, I think I am forced to open the ActiveRecord::Base class and patch it? May be I am

Hi I'm running an application that uses toolbook files such as tb70net.exe and others. winevdm.exe crashes leaving a long logfile starting with: wine: cannot find L"C:\\windows\\system32\\TB70.exe" mario at arrayan:~/.wine-bottles/Pipo/drive_c/Program Files/Pipouni> fixme:hook:Set WindowsHookEx16 System-global hooks (7) broken in Win16 wine: Unhandled page fault on read access

Hello, on a server i did an upgrade from version 2.2.8 to 3.0.5. The machine runs with RedHat 7.3. The 2.2.8 version was built from the makerpms.sh script. The samba server is configured as Domain Controller. The version 3.0.5 was built the same way and installed via rpm. Now nobody can use domain logins. In the logfiles i found entries like this: >--- cut here ---- [2004/07/26 17:30:19,

Hello together, I already sent the message below to xen-users a few days ago, but didn''t get an answer. So I hope that here on xen-devel is someone who has some ideas (or is using XEN on this specific system and can confirm this isn''t a problem within xen itself but with this specific BIOS or sth. similar :-) ). ---------- I''ve just setup a new gentoo-system to get