similar to: Question on TBAA and optimization

Hi Tom, Matt, I'm running into strange issues with the cos test (piglit generated_tests/cl/builtin/math/builtin-float-cos-1.0.generated.c) I have been seeing random failures (incorrect results) for some time and tried to investigate. the weird part is that the failures are not 100% reproducible, sometimes the tests pass, or partly pass (it's usually float8 and float16 subtests that

Hi, I just spent 4 hours trying to find a way to get the name of the resolver function of a ifunc definition ... :-( and with all that time I didnt event get far: for (GlobalIFunc &IF : M.ifuncs()) { StringRef ifunc_name = IF.getName(); Constant *r = IF.getResolver(); But how do I get to the (Function*) or function name of the resolver from there? I tried everything with the Constant

Hi Simon, Thanks for reposting the example, and looking at it more carefully, I think it is very similar to my first proposal. This was met with some resistance here because it dumps loop information in the vector preheader. Doing it this early, we want to emit this in the vectoriser, puts a restriction on (future) optimisations that transform vector loops to honour/update/support this intrinsic

Invitation accepted, I am happy to help out with reviews, like I did with the previous VP patches. And of course agreed that things should be well defined, and that we shouldn't paint ourselves in a corner, but I don't think that this is the case. And it's not that I am in a rush, but I don't think this change needs to be predicated on a big change landing first like the LV

> You have similar problems with https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100 The new revision D79100<https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100> solves your comment 1), and I don't think your comments2) and 3) apply as there are no vendor specific intrinsics involved at all here. Just to quickly discuss the optimisation pipeline, D79100<https://reviews.llvm.org/D79100> is a small extension for the

Hi, I abandoned that approach and followed Eli's suggestion, see somewhere earlier in this thread, and emit an intrinsic that represents/calculates the active mask. I've just uploaded a new revision for D79100 that implements this. Cheers. ________________________________ From: Simon Moll <Simon.Moll at EMEA.NEC.COM> Sent: 18 May 2020 13:32 To: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at

What are you querying the alias analysis on in the above example - between the load and store? How are you creating your MemoryLocation for those too? On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 6:03 AM Venkataramanan Kumar via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Can someone please clarify me on this? > > > > On Wed, 13 Nov 2019 at 22:25, Venkataramanan Kumar < >

Hi, I have the following LLVM IR. ----Snip--- %1 = getelementptr inbounds %struct._X, %struct._X* %0, i64 0, i32 3 %2 = load %struct._X*, %struct._X** %1, align 8, !tbaa !10 .... ..... ....... %3 = bitcast %struct._Y** %1 to i8** store i8* null, i8** %3, align 8, !tbaa !9 !9 = !{!7, !7, i64 0} !7 = !{!"omnipotent char", !8, i64 0} !8 = !{!"Simple C/C++ TBAA"} ----Snip----

Hello! Say I have a function foo1, which has argument ... to pass various arguments to foo2 i.e. foo1 <- function(x, ...) { foo2(x, ...) } Say that foo2 accepts argument arg1 and I would like to do the following: - if foo1 is called as foo1(x) then I would like to assign some value to arg1 inside foo1 before calling foo2 arg1 <- "some value" foo2(x, arg1=arg1) - if foo1 is

Hi I have within a quite big function foo1, an internal function foo2. Now, in order to have a cleaner code, I wish to have the internal foo2 as "external". This foo2 was using arguments within the foo1 environment that were not declared as inputs of foo2, which works as long as foo2 is within foo1, but not anymore if foo2 is external, as is the case now. Now, I could add all those

Thank you very much for your useful suggestions. These are exactly what I was looking for. foo <- list(foo1, foo2, foo3) lapply(foo, function(x) matrix(unlist(x), nrow = length(x), byrow = TRUE)) or lapply(foo, function(x) do.call('rbind', x)) Best, Muhammad Subianto On 4/11/06, Muhammad Subianto <msubianto at gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > I have a result my experiment

Dear all, I have a result my experiment like this below (here my toy example): foo1 <- list() foo1[[1]] <- c(10, 20, 30) foo1[[2]] <- c(11, 21, 31) foo2 <- list() foo2[[1]] <- c(100, 200, 300) foo2[[2]] <- c(110, 210, 310) foo3 <- list() foo3[[1]] <- c(1000, 2000, 3000) foo3[[2]] <- c(1100, 2100, 3100) list(foo1,foo2,foo3) The result: > list(foo1,foo2,foo3) [[1]]

Hi the list, I define a method that want to change an object without assignation (foo(x) and not x<-foo(x)) using deparse and assign. But when the argument of the method does not match *exactly* with the definition of the generic function, assign does not work... Anything wrong? Christophe #------ Does not work ------#

Hi to all Authors@R: c(person("fooa","foob", role = c("aut","cre"), email = "fooa.foob@fooc.de"), person("foo1","foo2", role = c("ctb"), email = "foo1.foo2@foo3.de")) Author: fooa foob, with contributions from foo1 foo2 using r CMD check --as-cran .. (R 3.1

Dear List: In short, I am writing a number of functions as building blocks for other functions and have some questions about scoping and passing arguments. Suppose I have functions foo1, foo2, and foo3 such that: foo1<-function(a=1,b=TRUE,c=FALSE){#do stuff}; foo2<-function(x=1,y=FALSE,z=c(1,2,3,4)){#do stuff}; foo3<-function(lambda,...){lambda*foo1()*foo2()}; I want to be able to

Dear all, I have define a function and its methods as follows: ######## beginning of code fn <- function(x,...){ UseMethod("fn") } fn.foo1 <- function(x, commonA=1, ...){ print("fn.foo1 is called.") } fn.foo2 <- function(x, uniqueFoo2, common=1, ...){ ## uniqueFoo2 is a unique argument in fn.foo2 x <- uniqueFoo2; class(x) <- "foo1" ## use uniqueFoo2

Hi all, For some reason, I would like to use functions bellow (see example code bellow), but instead I get the following error message: *Error in foo2(...) : unused argument(s) (arg3 = 3)* #--------------------- # example code #--------------------- foo1 <- function(arg1,...) { print(arg1) foo2(...) foo3(...) } foo2 <- function(arg2) { print(arg2) } foo3 <- function(arg3) {

This is a recent R-devel. file.copy() is not vectorized if multiple destinations succeed: cat("foo1\n", file = "foo1") cat("foo2\n", file = "foo2") unlink(c("copy1", "copy2"), recursive = TRUE) file.copy(c("foo1", "foo2"), c("copy1", "copy2"), copy.date = TRUE) #> Error in

Dear R-devel, I'm trying to validate the results from a C function, against a (trial and tested) older R function. For reasons unknown to me, the C function seems to give different result sometimes at each trial, even with the very same data. These are the relevant outputs from R: > library(QCA) Loading required package: lpSolve > benchmark <- function(x, y) { + index <- 0

Hi, I'm running postfix as SMTP-server and dovecot as IMAP-server. The server has multiple IPs, and postfix is configured that every domain is using a separate IPv4-address. Examle: foo1.com --> 11.22.33.44 foo2.com --> 22.33.44.55 foo3.com --> 33.44.55.66 bar.org --> 66.77.88.99 The hostname of the server is: mail.bar.org Now I have a request from one of my customers,