similar to: How to compile chrome?

Hi all, I'm working on improvements to diagnostics handling in LLVM, specifically for the benefit of the (integrated) assembler. The goal is to support options such as -Werror, -w, and -W<warning> for files assembled with clang and inline assembly. Clang already has support for these options but does not apply them to diagnostics originating from (inline) assembly. I plan to add an

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 23:33:39 +0300 > From: Moty Fux <moty.fux at gmail.com> > > Hi, > > Did anyone manage to install chromium on CentOS 7? > I tried and got this error: > > Error: Package: chromium-31.0.1650.63-2.el6.x86_64 (chromium-el6) > Requires: libudev.so.0()(64bit) > > Tried to

Hello, I have been using chrome for a while now on other systems. I am having an issue finding Chrome for Centos. Can anyone point me in the right direction? Thnx. -- Regards Robert Linux The adventure of a lifetime. Linux User #296285 Get Counted http://linuxcounter.net/

Hi all, BitstreamReader is the only in-tree client of the DataStreamer and MemoryObject interfaces. In practice when using user-facing LLVM tools, the bitcode will normally either be in memory or in a file, so the best way to access it is through memory, either directly or memory mapped. As part of some refactorings I am making to BitstreamReader, I would like to simplify it by changing it to

I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older Chrome version that is compatible? Todd -- Ariste Software Petaluma, CA 94952 http://www.aristesoftware.com

https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. If this is true, then it affects my school and my students. I like google-chrome and it works very well with google services. I was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working

Hi all, I have installed Google Chrome in two CentOS7 workstations. I would like to setup some extensions by default and install automatically. Reading Chrome/Chromium docs, it is possible to accomplish this using master_preferences or via policy. According to Chromium's docs, policy files needs to be installed under /etc/opt/chrome/policies/managed/ (for Chrome) or

And on a separate thread [0] Derek indicated he'd be fine with removing it. I'll leave this thread open until end of Monday to receive any other opinions, then proceed to remove it. Peter [0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20161024/400754.html On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Peter Collingbourne <peter at pcc.me.uk> wrote: > Hi all, > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:14, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Please answer the original question (again) CentOS folks. > > Where are we with getting the RHEL version of Chromium available > for CentOS? > > There should be no technical reason why we can't get a working, up > to date, and therefore secure version of chromium running on CentOS

Google Chrome Terms of Service(Google Chrome executable),?BSD?(source code and Chromium executable except chromium 5 beta),BSD License?with proprietary parts (source code and chromium 5 beta executable, as it integrates?Adobe Flash Player?10.1[1])[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Chrome in my?interpretation, this means Google Chrome is fully open-source, only the flash player has proprietary

Hi all, Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome. "This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this Linux system will no longer be supported." Doing some google searches I found this;

I'd be interested in using this but I have to wait until someone ports this to firefox (or at least chromium). Thanks for sharing it though! On 3/31/20 2:16 PM, River Riddle via llvm-dev wrote: > For those interested I've uploaded to the chrome store to make installs > easier. An install link is now included on the repo. > > -- River > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020, 1:44 PM

I have been using CentOS on my laptop for a few days now and it works great! Great work-around for the Fedora GNOME 3 debacle. But I'm starting to miss Google Chrome pretty seriously. Firefox is just not what it once was. It's slow. Spell check is weak. Sometimes it straight up fails to display pages after going "back". There are numerous details like this that just make FF

I thought you all would like to know that Google considers Nouveau to be unstable and is now actively considering blacklisting. Please see this issue on their issue tracker. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=876523 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this Linux system will no longer be supported. Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable (since, as I

Hi, I'm still Yves. This other fix <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/1061499/> never made it to opus repository. It seems safe and sane enough to be applied to opus master branch. What do you think? -- Warm regards, Yves -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 04/18/2016 09:06 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org> wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get >>> this to work, since it's

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 13:34, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Unfortunately, I have neither the time, nor expertise to partake in > such a project. is there someone else on here who can help ? I think if we can demonstrate some traction, it would go a long way in both the upstream engagement and the conversation with Red Hat - since we can then demonstrate a

LLVM already implements its own version of almost all of binutils. The exceptions to this rule are objcopy and strip. This is a proposal to implement an llvm version of objcopy/strip to complete llvm’s binutils. Several projects only use gnu binutils because of objcopy/strip. LLVM itself uses objcopy in fact. Chromium and Fuchsia currently use objcopy as well. If you want to distribute your build

Hi all, trust all is well! I was wondering if LLVM would have a Bazel integrated build in the future? I can imagine the benefits this could bring, especially with regards to remote builds and caching. I'm thinking of dumping the LLVM source-tree into my code-base and experiment with building LLVM via Bazel. Will pull requests be accepted for this? I won't mind contributing my changes