similar to: Register allocation constraints

Dear all, I am a total beginner in R, so sorry if this is the wrong place. I am using R 2.10.1 on a Mac (Mac OS 10.6.2). I have this small dataset : growth sugar 75 C 72 C 73 C 61 F 67 F 64 F 62 S 63 S I have no problem reading the table, or getting the summary, but if I try boxplot(growth~sugar, ylab="growth", xlab="sugar", data=Dataset), I have the following error :

Yes, the arch is just as you said, something like AMD GPU, but Intel GPU don't have separate register file for 'scalar/vector'. In fact my idea of defining the register tuples was borrowed from SIRegisterInfo.td in AMD GPU. But seems that AMD GPU mainly support i32/i64 register type, while Intel GPU also support byte/short register type. So I have to start defining the registers from

Beta 1 is now available for testing. New Features: 1) AUTOMAKE=Yes now causes all directories on the CONFIG_PATH to be searched for files newer than the script that last started/restarted the firewall. 2) FORMAT-2 actions may now specify default parameter values using the DEFAULTS directive. DEFAULTS <def1>,<def2>,... Where <def1> is the default

Beta 1 is now available for testing. New Features: 1) AUTOMAKE=Yes now causes all directories on the CONFIG_PATH to be searched for files newer than the script that last started/restarted the firewall. 2) FORMAT-2 actions may now specify default parameter values using the DEFAULTS directive. DEFAULTS <def1>,<def2>,... Where <def1> is the default

Hello, i have a little question. My system: ip route: 0.0.0.0/1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 default via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 proto static metric 425 10.8.0.1 via 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 10.8.0.5 dev tun0 proto kernel scope link src 10.8.0.6 88.198.140.127 via 192.168.2.1 dev br0 192.168.2.0/24 dev br0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.101 metric 425 192.168.122.0/24 dev virbr0 proto kernel

Hi all, When I defined a network use the host bridge "virbr1" an error occurred : "libvir: error : Unable to create bridge virbr1: File exists" But how can I define this network use the host bridge "virbr1" ? <network> <name>def1</name> <bridge name='virbr1'/> <forward mode='nat'> <interface dev='eth0'/>

Hi all, Can someone please explain me how to use REG_SEQUENCE in tablegen? The arch i'm writing backend for has 32-bit regs, and it has a couple of 64-bit load/store instructions which use two neighboring regs at once, which i'm trying to employ using virtual regs with subs. For example, it I want to move one 64-bit virtual reg to another, I'm trying to use the following pattern:

Hi Escha, Great to have your comment! Do you have any specific reason for not doing like this? I am not sure whether I understand your point correctly. For "just model one thread", do you mean "only considering ONE of the 8/16 working lanes that running in lock-step way"?? For my case, may be something like I only need to define r0~r127 as register for i32 register (each r#

You need to ensure that traffic to the SIP box is sent to the correct IP. Also if you use split-tunnel (eg: not redirect-gateway def1) you must make sure NAT and traffic redirection works as is so the Asus router knows it should send the traffic through tunnel and not via WAN. IMPORTANT: Then you must, in the ASUS RT-N66U make a port forward inwards from TUN to the phone client. I would suggest

Greetings, I am trying the get the standard errors of multiple comparisons using Tukey's HSD. These are not reported by the function TukeyHSD. When I apply the following code to the data, which I store as PROLE4.TXT, several unexpected things happen. First, the function TukeyHSD works for all the comparisons but the function simint doesn't. Second, after the application of na.omit

Unfortuantely we don't know if a particular load is a real 2d image (as would be a cube face or 2d array element), or a layer of a 3d image. Since we pass in the TIC reference, the instruction's type has to match what's in the TIC (experimentally). In order to properly support bindless images, this also can't be done by looking at the current bindings and generating appropriate

At 09:09 AM 4/18/2016, you wrote: >On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, david wrote: > >>FOLLOWUP & REPORT >> >>I had lots of suggestions, and the most persuasive was to try >>OpenVPN. I already had a CA working, so issuing certificates was >>easy. The HOW-TO guides were less helpful than I could hope, but >>comparing several of them, applying common sense, and

Greetings - Could someone help me understand what the latest situation id with regard to ACLs and sharing mailboxes, please? Currently we are using Dovecot 1.0.x but will be moving to 1.1 when it comes out of Beta (and hopefully I'll get some time before too long to try building a test setup to play with). So I'm happy to talk only about ACLs and sharing mailboxes in 1.1... We

Hii All, I'm really a linux newbie, I managed to run into a problem with rsync. I want to conduct backups of various files and directories over about miles of Internet, so I chose ssh and rsync for the job. Earlier it used to work fine, but suddenly donno what happened it started to show the following errors sync: mkstemp

Hi All, If the target supports quad-register R0:R1:R2:R3 (Rn is 32-bit register), is it possible mapping quad-register to v4i32 so that the following example work? typedef int v4si __attribute__ ((vector_size (16))); void foo(v4si i) { v4si j = i; } I don't know how to write CallingConv.td to represent the concept of occupying quad-register R0:R1:R2:R3 once seeing

Hello, there is one route missing: 128.0.0.0/1. config client: route-nopull redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp best regards Helmut Viele Gr??e Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH He?br?hlstra?e 15 70565 Stuttgart Gesch?ftsf?hrung Dr.-Ing. Roswitha Hahn-Drodofsky HRB 21091 Stuttgart USt.ID: DE190582774 Tel. 0711 781941 0 Fax: 0711 781941 79 Mail: info at internet-xs.de

Helmut Drodofsky wrote: > Hello, > > there is one route missing: > > 128.0.0.0/1. > Did you mean 127.0.0.0? mark > config client: > route-nopull > redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp > > best regards > Helmut > > Viele Gr??e > Helmut Drodofsky > > Internet XS Service GmbH > He?br?hlstra?e 15 > 70565 Stuttgart > > Gesch?ftsf?hrung

On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:20 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > >> >> On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> >>> In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well,

Xen Host Server OS: SLES10 Kernel: 2.6.16.21-0.8-xen x86_64 Hardware: Sun 4200 Memory: 12Gb Guest Domains (2 total) RHEL4-U3 2.6.16-xen x86_64 2Gb Swap 4Gb RAM 2 Nics bridged to seperate physical Nics (Public and Private) Systems come up normal and we are able to mount filer space to the guest domains and do work. However, at some point, the guest

On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:23 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: > >> In the past, I've seen some pushback on the list against adding more register classes. You can see it in the code as well, TargetLowering::getRegClassForInlineAsmConstraint() returns a vector of registers instead of a real register class. >> >> What