similar to: COAT: an EDSL making just-in-time code generation easier

Greetings, I have a simple C++ EDSL working using the JIT execution engine. When I upgraded to LLVM 3.2 (effortless upgrade, awesome stuff!) I thought I would try taking the MCJIT for a spin after having read that the JIT is considered to be "legacy". So the changes I made to my code were: + #include <llvm/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT.h> - #include <llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h> +

Hello, I'm a new LLVM user working on a C++ EDSL for image processing. I have a function, which after applying createInstructionCombiningPass() and createDeadCodeEliminationPass() looks like: define void @jitcv_sum_64sf1001(%Matrix* %src, %Matrix* %dst, i32 %len) { entry: br label %loop_i loop_i: ; preds = %loop_i_end, %entry %i = phi i32 [ 0,

All inquiries can be sent to me at lisa.shone@bluecoat.com As a Principal Engineer within the Network Infrastructure Group, this developer has a major role in the ongoing development of our networking facilities for Blue Coat's Proxy SG family of products. Current highlights include Blue Coat's industry leading development of IPv6 functionality as well as re-architecture of the

For upwards of 40 years North Face backyard clothing along with gear company continues to be the most trustworthy origin with regard to outside lovers everywhere. This really is the same to North face apex bionic jacket sale (http://www.northerfacestore.com/north-face-apex-bionic-c-5.html)wool jumper, which is made to supply it person the ideal combination of kind, match, purpose, and comfort.

+ MLIR dev mailing list since that’s where the OrcJit I’m using is. Thanks for all the details, Lang! What you described is exactly what I’m looking for! Please, MLIR dev, let me know if this debug feature and the solution that Lang describes below is interesting for MLIR. I’ll dig more into the details then but it doesn’t seem too complicated. Thanks, Diego From: Lang Hames [mailto:lhames at

On 4 August 2016 at 17:31, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > (1) The list says nothing about using (appropiate) LLVM infrastructure > like the MC subsystem. Should it be a requirements for (new) targets to > support the full source-to-object chain? Hi Joerg, This is a clear task for code review, not target inclusion policy. This list is

I looked around for the status of OrcJIT FFI support. The last e-mail thread I could find was this one: Link <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-February/081679.html> Raw: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-February/081679.html Is OrcJIT now considered stable enough that there can be "official" exposed C APIs? If not, what's the standard approach if I

I didn't seen any roadmap and plan about OrcJit & MCJIT. And would OrcJIT be stablize in version 7.0? Or latter version? Would MCJIT be removed in source tree, when? -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello everyone A previous thread about OrcJIT brought up bug reports on Bugzilla. A quick search gives 20+ results: https://bugs.llvm.org/buglist.cgi?component=OrcJIT&list_id=162232&query_format=advanced&resolution=--- While some of them are obviously outdated (addModuleSet API cleanup [1]), others may actually be relevant again (Small code model? [2]). If you reported one of them,

Hello, I was wondering if there is someone already working on putting the new OrcJIT APIs in the LLVM-C bindings? Also, is there a general consensus to also add C bindings when new major features are added? Hayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150201/061f5949/attachment.html>

Hi everyone, I'm having trouble adding error bars to a grouped barchart in lattice. I know that this topic has been addressed quite a bit, as I've been searching the internet for a while to try to troubleshoot the issue, but I've not been able to find any solution that I could get working on my data. I was wondering if someone could look at my code and tell me what I'm doing

Hi All, I'm back again after a couple of weeks hiatus, and I have some good news for anyone interested in cross-process JITing with OrcV2: The remote TargetProcessControl and Orc library breakup patch has landed in 1d0676b54c4 [1]. Thanks very much to Dave Blaikie and Stefan Graenitz for all their feedback on the review! As described in my last email, this commit breaks the OrcJIT library

I've been playing with OrcJIT a bit, and from the looks of it I can (like in the previous JIT I suppose?) ask for a function to be re generated. If I've given the address of the function that LLVM gave me to an external party, do "I" need to ensure thread-safety? Or is it safe to ask OrcJIT to re generate code at that address and everything will work magically? I'm

Hi Stefan Thank you! In case, you missed in llvm-dev listing: you can find the proposal here : link. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1202EcXlWMQ8yxu5qD0b5fE0a_kihlcaPNpZo_Jk0YeQ/edit?usp=sharing> Thanks for working on summarising the Bugzilla tickets to track the recent changes in ORC this is really helpful. On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 21:33, Stefan Gränitz <stefan.graenitz at

Hello, I get a crash in my program that uses exceptions and the LLVM JIT, even though the exceptions are controlled and thrown/catched in a part that doesn't deal with LLVM. I noticed that llvm-config --cxxflags includes the -fno-exceptions flag. Do I need to throw no exceptions whatsoever in my application to use LLVM JIT? As a minimal example, I modified the code in

Because of space limitations and because of the location of the punch-down blocks, my * server is located on the shelf in a coat closet. Sadly, there is not enough space (or ventilation) for the monitor and keyboard. This will all change when we move to new quarters, but... Does anyone have experience running Linux/Asterisk without a monitor? What, if any, are the issues? TIA

Thanks, David. I'd be happy to add the bindings .. is there a general way we add them? Or do you just scrub the API and make sensible judgements to the API? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Hayden Livingston <halivingston at gmail.com > > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I

Hi Hayden, Dave's answer covers this pretty well. Neither Orc nor MCJIT currently reason about replacing function bodies. They may let you add duplicate definitions, but how they'll behave if you do that isn't specified in their contracts. They definitely won't replace old definitions unless you provide a custom memory manager that's rigged to lay new definitions down on top

Hi, On 2018-07-19 14:57:42 +0200, Frank Tetzel via llvm-dev wrote: > > Have you seen https://reviews.llvm.org/D44892? we are using it in > > Julia to use perf on jitted code. > > No, I did not see this patch before. Thanks a lot for the pointer. > > It seems to be doing exactly what I want. Let's see if I get it working. FWIW, I just merged this. Did you have any

I'm writing a program that will tell me whether I should wear a coat, so I'd like to be able to download daily weather forecasts and daily reports of recent past weather conditions. The NOAA has very promising tabular forecasts (http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?CityName=Ithaca&state=NY&site=BGM&textField1=42.4422&textField2=-76.5002&e=0&FcstType=digital),