similar to: LLVM-8.0 | Requesting Help : Function->getName() returns empty string

Hi all, I am trying to write a pass where i am creating a clone of a function (the only difference being, the new function returns void , instead of any value). I am creating a new Function Type with a void return type (rest being the same as original function), and using this i am creating a new function body. Then, i clone the body of the old function into new function, but when ever i

Hi, I'm gonna try to give some feedback, but I have only been working with LLVM for a few days, so don't take what I'm saying without verifying :-) > BasicBlock *ProgSlicer::CloneBasicBlock(const BasicBlock *BB, > DenseMap<const Value*, Value*> &ValueMap, > const char *NameSuffix, Function *F) { > > BasicBlock

hello sir, in llvm installation ./configure command worked properly but while giving make -j 4 command in ubuntu everything got build properly but at last it showed error as llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/ build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory

Hi all, I tried to compile the theora source with VS2005. But it asked for the ogg library. error message is as follow. **************************************************************************** Error 1 fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'ogg/ogg.h': No such file or directory c:\Documents and Settings\Manoj\Desktop\libtheora-1.0beta3\include\theora\codec.h 64 Error

Hi, I am trying to install CentOS on an Opensolaris Dom0. virt-install fails with an error in virDomainCreateLinux(). Is this a known issue? Am I missing some step? manoj@mowgli:~$ uname -a SunOS mowgli 5.11 snv_101b i86pc i386 i86xpv Solaris manoj@mowgli:~$ pfexec virt-install What is the name of your virtual machine? centos How much RAM should be allocated (in megabytes)? 512 What would

Even if it still did add overhead, it seems perfectly reasonable, from a user's perspective (namely mine), that if I introduce unnecessary narrowing matchers to my chain that there may be a performance penalty. The ability to do the following easily outweighs any performance issues for me: anyOf ( /* hasName("..."), */ hasName("...") ) though C++ not allowing

Hello everyone, We are working on a particular points-to analysis. The final output of that analysis should not have the LLVM SSA temporaries (like, %0, %1). My doubt is that whether we can extract the normal C variables from LLVM IR or is there any way to differentiate between SSA temporary and local C variable? For e.g. in GCC I can check whether a particular variable is an SSA temporary like,

>> Agreed. If ld64 can drop support for .o produced by the old gcc that >> would be awesome. Failing that, what is really needed is > Because of static archives, the linker has to support old .o files for quite a while. I also don’t know when clang starting getting this right. r123585 (Jan 16 17:19:34 2011) I think. > Also, this seems like linker complexity for a very

hello sir, ./configure worked properly but while giving make -j 2 command in ubuntu everything got build properly but at last it showed error as llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/ build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory

hello sir, ./configure worked properly but while giving make -j 2 command in ubuntu everything got build properly but at last it showed error as llvm[4]: Linking Debug+Asserts executable clang collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed] make[4]: *** [/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/

You should use make -j with a number lower than 4, it looks like you ran out of memory when linking. On 10 February 2013 15:41, Manoj C <manoj.chinthala at gmail.com> wrote: > hello sir, > in llvm installation ./configure command worked properly but while > giving > make -j 4 command in ubuntu > > everything got build properly but at last it showed error as > >

I am faced with a situation wherein I have to use multiple lapply's. The pseudo-code could be approximated to something as below: For each X from i=1 to n For each Y based on j=1 to m For each F from 1 to f Do some calculation based on Fij Store Xi,Yj = Fij End For F End for Y End for X Is there anyway to optimize the processing logic further? I *guess* using the multiple lapply

>> The literalN sections were developed long ago to support coalescing of >> unnamed constants like 9.897 in source code for architectures that could not >> embed large constants in instructions. The linker could knew how to break >> up the section (e.g. __literal8 is always 8 byte chunks) and coalesce copies >> by content. >> >> ~6 years ago we

** Low Priority ** Hi Volker, This is regarding your fix on recycled PIDs. I am an NCP developer from Novell and we use libsmbsharemodes library from Samba for Cross Protocols Locks between NCP, Samba and others. I have few queries regarding your fix. In your fix, you have added a new field called 'unique_id' in the server_id structure and we need to pass this in our call to samba

Dear All, For any given vector, I want to extract a sub-vector such that the new vector skips all zeros, if any , at the start of vector. Is it possible to achieve this w/o looping? E.G : > x = c(0,0,1,2,3,4,5,0,0,8,9) > y = somefunc(x); > y [1] 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 8 9 In the example above, I want to skip the two

Hi, I was trying to use the following code in a if condition I->getOperand(0)->hasName() where I is an instruction with following condition already true - I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Call When I compiled a C code with llvm-2.9, I see a function call with no operand name (for operand 0) . This happens for a function with varArgs. The interesting part is that the same C code when

Hi, I am using ubuntu 9.04. I have installed ubuntu 9.04. And then downloaded wine-1.0.1.tar.bz2 from winhq/download site. Then follow following steps: 1) Untar files: tar jxvf wine-1.0.1.tar.bz2 2) cd wine-1.0.1/ 3) ./tools/wineinstall During step three, following error comes: ******************************************** make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/manoj/wine-1.0.1/dlls/fusion'

Whew... What a relief. I know the list was worried about why we could not get a hold of Manoj Shetty.... W -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Manoj Shetty Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 12:24 PM To: asterisk-users Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Manoj Shetty is out of the office. [Email checked- EMEA] I

hello sir, i am using llvm compiler for my project.i an doing llvm installation.i followed all the steps in the llvm website but after running this command ../llvm/configure --enable-targets=host-only it executed but it didnt create any make file in build directory ,only config.log file is appeared after running this command. after running the later command it is showing like this

hello sir, while i am trying to run make -j 2 comand while installation it is showing like make: Warning: File `/home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/build/Makefile.llvmbuild' has modification time 2.8e+04 s in the future llvm[0]: Reconfiguring with /home/manoj/Desktop/LLVM/llvm/configure what does it mean????? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: