similar to: llvm combines "ADD frameindex, constant" to OR

Hi, I have a question regarding to lnt. We are working on NEC SX-Aurora Vector Engine and preparing for upstreaming it on https://reviews.llvm.org/D69103 and following reviews. We are running llvm-test-suite to check our modifications often. To run this test suite, we need to specify our architecture to lnt and make program running under lnt to handle a few special cases. In order to do so,

Hello, we’d like to propose the integration of a new backend into LLVM: NEC SX-Aurora TSUBASA Vector Engine (VE). We hope to get some feedback here and at EuroLLVM about the path and proper procedure of merging. The SX-Aurora VE is a Vector CPU on an PCI-E Accelerator card. It has 48GB memory from six HBM2 stacks, accessible with 1.2TB/s bandwidth, 8 cores with vector and scalar units, each.

Hi Ravi, Please fine below the answers to your questions 1) I have never touched the cluster.quorum-type option. Currently it is set as following for this volume: Option Value ------ ----- cluster.quorum-type none 2) The .shareKey

Thank you Ravi for your fast answer. As requested you will find below the "stat" and "getfattr" of one of the files and its parent directory from all three nodes of my cluster. NODE 1: File: ?/data/myvolume-private/brick/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir4/dir5/dir6/dir7/dir8/dir9/dir10/OC_DEFAULT_MODULE/filename.shareKey? Size: 0 Blocks: 38 IO Block: 131072 regular

Hi mabi, Some questions: -Did you by any chance change the cluster.quorum-type option from the default values? -Is filename.shareKey supposed to be any empty file? Looks like the file was fallocated with the keep-size option but never written to. (On the 2 data bricks, stat output shows Size =0, but non zero Blocks and yet a 'regular empty file'). -Do you have some sort of a

Hello, I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Thanks, Mabi ? ??????? Original Message ??????? On May 17, 2018 11:07 PM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > ?? > > Hi Ravi,

On 05/23/2018 12:47 PM, mabi wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to ask if you had time to look into this bug I am encountering and if there is anything else I can do? > > For now in order to get rid of these 3 unsynched files shall I do the same method that was suggested to me in this thread? Sorry Mabi,? I haven't had a chance to dig deeper into this. The workaround of

On 05/15/2018 12:38 PM, mabi wrote: > Dear all, > > I have upgraded my replica 3 GlusterFS cluster (and clients) last Friday from 3.12.7 to 3.12.9 in order to fix this bug but unfortunately I notice that I still have exactly the same problem as initially posted in this thread. > > It looks like this bug is not resolved as I just got right now 3 unsynched files on my arbiter node

Dear all, I have upgraded my replica 3 GlusterFS cluster (and clients) last Friday from 3.12.7 to 3.12.9 in order to fix this bug but unfortunately I notice that I still have exactly the same problem as initially posted in this thread. It looks like this bug is not resolved as I just got right now 3 unsynched files on my arbiter node like I used to do before upgrading. This problem started

Hello. I'm trying to install Multisim 10 under Wine, but it fails with an "Unhandled MSI Error". Final error messages on the console are: renan at gothic:~/ewb_temp$ wine setup.exe fixme:volume:GetVolumePathNameW (L"I:\\ewb_temp\\support\\Resource_eng.dll", 0x717e28, 38), stub! fixme:volume:GetVolumePathNameW (L"I:\\ewb_temp\\support\\nipie.exe", 0x718970,

Hi Hal, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > [..] > Agreed; but what does your *ISelLowering::getPointerTy() function look > like? Did you override the default implementation? I wonder if returning > MVT::i64 from this function will make things work for you. > > -Hal > > I actually missed implementing this one. But, depending

The following problems happens with architectures, where stack alignment is smaller than the biggest preferred alignment for any data type SP pointer may point anywhere with alignment of stack alignment (4 in our case) SelectionDAGBuilder however calls CreateStackObject with preferred alignment is given data type(8 in our problemaric case. The ABI alignment for this data type is only 4) This

The deriv() function takes an 'expression' as its first argument). I was wondering if the this function can take an array or a vector of expressions as its first argument. Aside, I saw how to give a vector argument to the second argument. like to have something like: deriv(c(~x^2+y^3, ~x^5+y^6), c("x","y")) the documentation for this function talks about being able to

Hello. Will, thanks a lot for pointing me to the MaskedGatherSDNode and mgatherv4i32. I have to say that the definition of the "multiclass avx512_gather" from lib/Target/X86/X86InstrAVX512.td is difficult to follow and I prefer not to use it. I currently have some serious problems with TableGen - it gives an assertion failure:

Hello, I've hit an assertion in SelectionDAG where we try to merge 2 loads that have the same operands but their MMO flags differ. One is dereferenceable and one is not. I'm not sure what the underlying issue here is: 1) MDSDNode with the same operands should have the same flags set on their respective MMO. The fact the flags differ when the opcode,types,operands and address-space are

Hello. I wanted to inform that I fixed the bug from the previous email. The main reason for the bug was that I thought that the SDNode masked_gather is returning only 1 value, but it returns 2 (hence, I guess, the earlier reported, difficult to follow, error: "Assertion `New->getNumTypes() == 1"). masked_gather returns 2 values because: // SDTypeProfile -

Hello. I fixed the bug reported in the previous post on this thread (<<llvm::MemSDNode::MemSDNode(unsigned int, unsigned int, const llvm::DebugLoc&, llvm::SDVTList, llvm::EVT, llvm::MachineMemOperand*): Assertion `memvt.getStoreSize() <= MMO->getSize() && "Size mismatch!"' failed.>>) The problem with this strange error reported comes from

Hi Hal, On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jeroen Dobbelaere" <jeroen.dobbelaere at gmail.com> > [... ] > > I am trying to get llvm working for an architecture that has 64bit > > registers, but 32bit addresses. > > Because of that, I want the pointers to also be

Hi John, On Tue, 14 May 2019 at 17:51, Joan Lluch <joan.lluch at icloud.com> wrote: > This problem is also shared by the MSP430 target, and it’s very easy to reproduce by just compiling the code that I posted before. That's some good detective work; it definitely explains what you're seeing. Since MSP430 is affected it would probably be pretty easy to upstream an alignment-aware

Hi All I'm having nightmares with FrameIndexes during my backend development :( I have ComplexPatterns defined for my two addressing modes (RR and RI). Most of the time, FrameIndex operands appear to be on load/store nodes, in which case everything works fine as my custom addressing modes matchers work fine. Unfortunately, I now have an add node which has a FrameIndex operand (this results