similar to: Missing formal definition of "declare"?

I have the following test package. $ ls DESCRIPTION man NAMESPACE R $ cat DESCRIPTION Package: try.package Type: Package Title: What the package does (short line) Version: 1.0 Date: 2009-10-26 Author: Who wrote it Maintainer: Who to complain to <yourfault at somewhere.net> Description: More about what it does (maybe more than one line) License: What license is it under? LazyLoad: yes $

Hi, 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me know. For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation for how validate a new release: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final.

Hello everyone, While developing a parser for LLVM IR, I seem to have stumbled upon a potential ambiguity in the LLVM IR assembly language grammar. Most likely there is something which I may have overlooked, so wanted to reach out to a more experienced crowed for some feedback. How would the following set of tokens be interpreted [1]? declare void @foo() unnamed_addr global i32 42 As far as

On 25 May 2016 at 16:10, Robin Eklind via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > declare void @foo() unnamed_addr > global i32 42 Doesn't a global have to be named? The syntax in the IR reference doesn't make it optional: @<GlobalVarName> = [Linkage] [Visibility] [DLLStorageClass] [ThreadLocal] ... Cheers. Tim.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:16 PM Jon Roelofs via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > As an update, after lots of fixes from a number of different people > (thanks everyone!), the current list of false-positives on `ninja > check-llvm` for the more stringent Gotcha A diagnostic is: > > LLVM :: Analysis/CostModel/X86/vselect-cost.ll > LLVM ::

You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :) Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded. On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We

Hi, ExonFeatureSet I have an object of the above class. The following document mentioned it. http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/2.5/bioc/vignettes/oligo/inst/doc/ClassesUsedInOligo.pdf But I would like to see its defintion. I'm wondering if there is a way in R to give me the definition of any class? Regards, Peng

Hi, I am absolutely new to LLVM. Currently reading through documentation and the C-API (which i want to use). As i am working on Windows, i was curios on how to specify an import which links to a function exported by a dll. The DLLStorageClass seems to be the wy to go, this seems clear. But after declaring a function for import, how do i specify the DLL the function is included in?

2014-12-15 13:00 GMT+01:00 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: >> LLVM: CodeGen/Mips/cconv/arguments-struct.ll > > Do you have the verbose lit output for this test? > I ran it again in verbose mode, but there were no additional outputs. Cheers, Sebastian

>From Tom: The subject is debugging a program written in the R language,under Windows. (Sorry, but I do not know either the Apple OS or *nix.) A computer program will usually not work on the first try, if only because of the risk of typos. Instead, it must be debugged. Roughly, here is the sequence: (1) One codes a program using the R language, and stores it on the hard drive, using

Hi all, sorry to have sent the same question around. I am quite desperately looking for a solution to this problem and I figured the mailing list is the best bet. In my code, I generate the following function: define i32 @gl.qi([500 x i32] %x, i32 %i) { entry: %x. = alloca [500 x i32] %i. = alloca i32 %0 = alloca [500 x i32] store [500 x i32] %x, [500 x i32]* %x. store i32 %i, i32*

I'm trying to move from Matlab to R, and I'm stuck even getting started. This sounds to me like the dumbest question in the world but... how does one put R source code in files? Over the last three days I've gone front to back through the Introduction to R and the R Language Definition, and while I'm excited that the language is so Lispish, none of what I read described how to

I'd like to (re)start a discussion on a few gotchas in FileCheck that I've noticed working on various tests in llvm's suites. This begain in a review [1], but I'll try to summarize here so it gets the right audience before decisions are made on it (so to speak). 1: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77227 The main sticking point is the abundance of checks in FileCheck tests that appear to

> On 15.12.2014, at 15:45, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] >> On Behalf Of Sebastian Dreßler >> Sent: 15 December 2014 14:08 >> Cc: Ben Pope; Nikola Smiljanic; llvmdev >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase

Hi, supposing I have a function “foo” like the following: int foo(int a, int b) { ... ... } I want to insert int the LLVM IR a call instructions to a function “bar” that requires the same parameters of foo. So my function foo will become: int foo(int a, int b) { bar(a,b); … ... } I am using the following code: bool ThreadSanitizer::runOnFunction(Function &F) {

Hi, I’ve come back and updated my llvm toolset with modern code (my branch was about 1-2 years old) and now the llvm IR files produced by my front end no longer compile with llc. Here is a sample of llvm ir produced by my front end (it’s a standard version 3.1 build of swift from the swift.org open source website). ; ModuleID = 'main.ll' source_filename = "main.ll" target

Most LLVM IR instructions have a result field, according to the Language Reference. I want to know, for all LLVM Instructions, is there an easy and consistent way to know if the current Inst has a result field? And if yes, what is the best way to obtain it? E.g.: <result> = add<ty> <op1>,<op2> /; yields {ty}:result / All ADD instruction will have a

Hello! Some CS-guys (the type who knows what Church formalism is) keep asking me questions about formal definitions of R-language that I can not answer (or even understand). Is there some freely available papers which I can throw at them where it would be explained is R functional/OOP/procedural language, does it use weak/strong, dynamic/static typization, does it use lazy or ...(do not know

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Davide Italiano <davide at freebsd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 3:59 PM, Johan Engelen via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just found an optimization regression regarding simple > > dataflow/constprop analysis: > > https://godbolt.org/g/Uz8P7t > > > > This code >

That’s useful info, thanks. I think it will be useful for me to understand the connection, why this type of pointer is being emitted now. Do you have any suggestions where i can look to find the platform specific code that is making function pointers go into addrspace? Carl p.s. I am also working on passing the avr target flag to swift, but swift itself had (has?) limitations that make it