similar to: LLVM header files for Kaleidoscope tutorial

Hi, I am brand new to LLVM, or more precisely, trying to be. I'm getting stuck on compiling LLVM. - I tried installing on a Mint 18.1 VM with 6GB RAM, and the builds of some large executables were killed by the OOM killer. I finally realized that I needed to build using shared libraries, and succeeded. This was in November. - I put aside my LLVM project, and just got back to it. I got stuck

I was wondering if there is an answer to this challenge or if I just have to live with it? I'm a bit of a Newbie here. I'm in the process of setting up Samba -2.2.2 on a Redhat v7.1 (Seawolf) server. I've discovered that joining the NT Domain is a simple matter of smbpasswd -j DOMAIN_NAME smbpasswd picks up the PDC name from smb.conf and moves right along. There is no need to

On 30 June 2014 16:16, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at codeaurora.org> wrote: > I think you are hitting a bug, the Observer pattern was added a few weeks > back, and may be there is some sort of uninitialized variable ? This is my back-trace at "-O2 -g" (since -O1 pass): operator() (file=<optimized out>, __closure=0x7fffffffde40) at

I try to understand cmake build configuration. As an example, I copied Kaleidoscope from llvm examples to some other directory (e.g., /tmp/Kaleidoscope). What change(s) that I need to make to "CMakkeLists.txt" in order to build Kaleidoscope from /tmp/Kaleidoscope? Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Are the Kaleidoscope examples supposed to work on Windows? e.g. C:\llvm\examples\Kaleidoscope\Orc\initial\toy.cpp when I try to compile this with clang it gives compile time error messages, and when I try with Microsoft C++ it generates an executable that runs but crashes when I type in an expression; I get similar results with a few of the other versions. I can give more detailed feedback if

Addendum: this still fails: auto ExprSymbol = J.findSymbol("putchard"); As yet, I have no idea why - that symbol even seemed to be exported: extern "C" double putchard(double X) { putchar((char)X); return 0; } On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:42 AM, Russell Wallace <russell.wallace at gmail.com> wrote: > To try to find out why it was crashing, I followed the

On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:42 AM, Rob Pieke wrote: > SUCCESS! > > Sorry, I had removed the addFnAttr() call by accident. Using the basicAA pass and ReadOnly, as you suggested, works like a charm! > > :) Thanks. I've updated the documentation and examples in r119169. I didn't update the OCaml documentation or examples yet. It looks like the OCaml bindings don't expose

Haohui Mai <haohui.mai at gmail.com> writes: > I've already filed a bug report but nobody cares :-( > > Is it possible to fix the documentation? Because I think the tutorial > is really important to beginners, which should not be misleading. > >> Thanks, -rdynamic helps! It's a pity that it's not written in the >> tutorial. >> >> Also

On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:31:57 -0500, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > Applied in r106468, thanks! > > -Chris I think there's a few bugs left in the Kaleidoscope tutorial -- I noticed somebody converted some of the "Builder.CreateAdd" to CreateFAdd, etc., but there seem to be a few that got missed. Attached diff is what I could find... Kevin Kelley

Can anyone point me in the right direction so i can have c like control flow in the Kaleidoscope example. for example in Kaleidoscope it's if a < 5 then //do something; to if (a < 5) { //do something } im trying to use LLVM to create an audio signal processing library/code for my music application to create music synths and audio effects. Thanks. -- View this message in

Perhaps somebody out there knows where this link should point: http://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#TypeResolve It simply goes to the top of the document, probably because something has been deleted or the document has been converted to reST. It is found on the last page of the Kaleidoscope tutorial: http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl8.html. -- Mikael -------------- next part

Hi All: I'm running Mandrake 8.1 (downloaded) and the install went fine. Configuring Samba however is another story. I get the message "could not connect to host - localhost" on the Linux box. I cannot see the network from the Linux system. The Linux system is visable from Win'98SE as are the shares but I cannot access them "password is incorrect". This does not

https://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/LangImpl04.html has an example where the function `foo` gets redefined, and the JIT returns evaluation of the latest definition. I thought my code was wrong, but it seems that the binary produced by `ninja Kaleidoscope-Ch4` has the same bug. Granted, my LLVM checkout is from Nov 3 2018 (r346062). Is this a known issue? ~Nick Desaulniers

Still no luck after switching to: theFPM->add( new llvm::TargetData( *theExecutionEngine->getTargetData() ) ); theFPM->add( llvm::createBasicAliasAnalysisPass() ); theFPM->add( llvm::createInstructionCombiningPass() ); theFPM->add( llvm::createReassociatePass() ); theFPM->add( llvm::createGVNPass() ); theFPM->add( llvm::createCFGSimplificationPass() ); Based on output

Hi all, being myself still a llvm novice I thought I'd do all fellow newbies a favor and provide a patch that makes the code in the tutorial compile with 2.4, just to avoid extra headache in the (not so easy) process of getting into the matters... it's actually just the new template parameters of the IRBuilder class. The patch is on the docs/ level since I didn't checkout the whole

Good morning everyone, It seems the LLVM tutorial is not up to date anymore and doesn't compile as is... The function makeLLVMModule() function doesn't compile at all. Here is a fix: Module *makeLLVMModule() { // Caches the global context to share it with new Module() and IntegerType::get() calls LLVMContext &context = getGlobalContext(); // Module Construction

Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html =================================================================== --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ def unary-(v) 0-v; -# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &gt;. +# Define &gt; with the same precedence as &lt;. def binary&gt; 10 (LHS RHS)

Applied in r106468, thanks! -Chris On Jun 2, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Adam Warner wrote: > Index: docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html > =================================================================== > --- docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (revision 105365) > +++ docs/tutorial/LangImpl6.html (working copy) > @@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ > def unary-(v) > 0-v; > > -# Define &gt; with

Nope, it seems that the code is correct after all. Perhaps a bit unclear, but correct. So shame on me! Cheers, Mikael ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mikael Lyngvig <mikael at lyngvig.org> Date: 2012/5/14 Subject: Tiny bug in Kaleidoscope sample To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Hi, As far as I can tell, there's a tiny error in the sample code for the Kaleidoscope

I hope this is the right place to ask this question. If not, please let me know where I can ask for help. We are using Kaleidoscope as the base framework to write a source to source compiler. Our source language has Strings with supported operations such as concatenation, upper case, and substrings. I am following the patterns set forth in Kaleidoscope, and need to represent my std::string as