Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Success with newhidups - Dynex DX-800U"
2006 Nov 11
1
Help with newhidups subdriver for Dynex UPS
Hello everyone!
If this message was posted twice, my apologies. I'm having issues with my webmail today...
I am using the testing version of NUT from SVN at changeset 582. I have successfully created a stub for newhidups driver for my Dynex DX-800U UPS, but I am completely lost on the customization of it. I've followed the hid-subdrivers.txt instructions and I understand I need to
2014 Aug 08
2
Cyberpower Value1200E might not need 0.667 battery scaling
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Matthew Stapleton <matthew4196 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just got a Cyberpower SOHO Value 1200 ELCD UPS and even with nut 2.7.2, it appears to report battery voltage too low due to the battery scaling function (In drivers/cps-hid.c). Even though the ups has usb id:
2014 Aug 09
0
Cyberpower Value1200E might not need 0.667 battery scaling
On Aug 8, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Matthew Stapleton <matthew4196 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I just got a Cyberpower SOHO Value 1200 ELCD UPS and even with nut 2.7.2, it appears to report battery voltage
2010 May 10
2
USB problems
I was getting:
"Can't claim USB device [0764:0501]: could not detach kernel driver from
interface 0: Operation not permitted"
so I manually installed the udev rules the source (I installed the
Gentoo ebuild).
I am now getting:
# upsdrvctl start
Network UPS Tools - UPS driver controller 2.4.3
Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3)
USB communication driver 0.31
Using
2012 Oct 06
1
CyberPower usbhid-ups continuously disconnects/reconnect
I have had a similar problem to many other people for the last few
months with my Cyberpower UPS. It was working properly after reboot
about one in five times; the rest of the time it would endlessly
disconnect and reconnect, according to syslog messages.
The latest I was able to find towards a solution is
http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org/msg06671.html
The root
2014 Aug 11
1
Cyberpower Value1200E might not need 0.667 battery scaling
Attached is the first 32 seconds of the driver output after applying the
patch which fixes the battery scaling problem for this UPS.
Matthew Stapleton
Email: matthew4196 at gmail.com
On 10/08/14 01:27, Charles Lepple wrote:
> On Aug 8, 2014, at 9:15 AM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>
2007 Sep 21
3
UPS shows 120%
I just got NUT 2.0.1 running on my Debian system at home.? I have a
new CPS UPS connected via USB.? Everything is working fine, except
the UPS is showing a value of 120% charged.? Any idea what causes
this?? Here's the upsc output for my UPS:
battery.charge:
120
battery.charge.low: 10
battery.charge.warning: 20
battery.runtime: 1320
battery.runtime.low: 300
battery.type:
PbAcid
2014 Aug 08
0
Cyberpower Value1200E might not need 0.667 battery scaling
On Aug 7, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Matthew Stapleton <matthew4196 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I just got a Cyberpower SOHO Value 1200 ELCD UPS and even with nut 2.7.2, it appears to report battery voltage too low due to the battery scaling function (In drivers/cps-hid.c). Even though the ups has usb id: 0764:0501, UPS.PowerSummary.Voltage reports 26.6 for the 24V batteries so when the 0.667
2020 Oct 31
2
ups.test.result meaning
Hi folks, new to list...
nut 2.7.2 on Ubuntu 16.04 with Cyberpowersystems CP1350PFCLCD.
After performing upscmd cp1350 at localhost test.battery.start.quick the
result was "Done and warning". I searched through syslog but could find no
additional information.
What is the warning?
Battery charge was 100% before test was performed.
Here's the full output from upsc after test:
2014 Aug 08
2
Cyberpower Value1200E might not need 0.667 battery scaling
I just got a Cyberpower SOHO Value 1200 ELCD UPS and even with nut
2.7.2, it appears to report battery voltage too low due to the battery
scaling function (In drivers/cps-hid.c). Even though the ups has usb
id: 0764:0501, UPS.PowerSummary.Voltage reports 26.6 for the 24V
batteries so when the 0.667 battery scale is applied that goes down to
17.7V.
upsc output:
battery.charge: 100
2005 Oct 19
1
CyberPower 685AVR and newhidups
Hi Scott,
Scott Alfter wrote:
> I had a UPS go bad recently (shuts off all by itself for no good reason,
>AFAICT), so I bought a CyberPower 685AVR this afternoon. The two CyberPower
>drivers in NUT 2.0.2 don't know how to talk to it, but the hidups driver
>appears to work properly. This means you have to use USB instead of RS-232
(it
>supports both), but at least it works.
>
2006 May 26
1
SVN Newhidups driver
Hi,
I recently installed a new cyberpower 1200AVR ups using the newhidups
driver I built from the subversion source.
I am recieving the following error on start up
dstate_setflags: base variable (ups.beeper.status) does not exist
dstate_setaux: base variable (ups.beeper.status) does not exist
Any ideas?
Thanks,
2007 Nov 16
1
Incorrect 'low battery' detected with Back-UPS XS 1200 (newhidups)
Hello All
I just discoverd NUT and I'm lovin' it. I was very successful getting
nut to monitor a CyberPower UPS along with having a Linux slave for a
friend of mine. I've come to a snag on my personal system though. I
currently have two Back-UPS XS 1200 APC UPSs, and I'm seeing
notifications of low battery on both units.
Now, both units are not showing 'low battery' on
2006 Oct 16
1
Problems with newhidups and Smart-UPS 750
Hello,
I encountered a problem with my APC Smart-UPS 750, connected via USB, using newhidups.
Without any reason, nut/upsmon shut down my PC:
>>>
Oct 13 12:57:08 echo kernel: usb 2-9.1.1: usbfs: USBDEVFS_CONTROL failed cmd newhidups rqt 161 rq 1 len 8 ret -71
Oct 13 12:57:12 echo upsmon[5060]: UPS smart750@localhost on battery
Oct 13 12:57:12 echo upsmon[5060]: UPS smart750@localhost
2006 Feb 28
3
Misreported values with newhidups
Okay, now that I've got NUT up and running with the newhidups driver, I can
give it a quick shakedown.
Most of the values look good, but are few are off. Here's what I get:
elrond@foxstar:~$ upsc foxstarups@localhost
battery.charge: 100
battery.charge.low: 10
battery.charge.warning: 50
battery.date: 3150/08/01
battery.mfr.date: 2005/03/22
battery.runtime: 1935
battery.runtime.low: 120
2005 Aug 29
1
Belkin and newhidups
Hi Peter,
I got all your patches and applied them, and I wanted to say kudos for a
great job done.
This is the output of upsc that I'm getting right now.
I had the same issue when using any cvs version (from two weeks ago)
that made my UPS go into a state where it wasn't functioning normally
(checking the kernel log shows that it cannot be connected and I had
around a page of DEVFS_USB
2020 Nov 01
4
ups.test.result meaning
On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 2:42 PM Tim Dawson <tadawson at tpcsvc.com> wrote:
> I'm going to guess that since your test runtime of 305 is very close to
> the low limit of 300, that's the warning. Not yet a fail, but very, very
> close.
>
I tried setting
override.battery.runtime.low = 60
in ups.conf, and waited for the UPS to reach 100% charge, and ups.status to
report only
2010 Nov 19
1
Nut compatibility list addition
Hi Patrick,
2010/11/15 Patrick O'Malley
> I've confirmed that the CyberPower CP1350AVRLCD works with nut using
> the USB port and the usbhid-ups driver. It is not on your list.
> Thanks!
>
have you checked all variables, and most of all that shutdown works as
expected?
ie http://new.networkupstools.org/user-manual.html#Testing_shutdowns
please also send us an upsc output.
2005 Oct 07
0
newhidups renaming and related (was: newhidups: merged regex changes)
2005/9/25, Peter Selinger <selinger@mathstat.dal.ca>:
>
> Arnaud Quette wrote:
> >
> > Some more points while you're at it:
> > - newhidups will have to be renamed. My aimed was to let the name until
> we
> > can superceed hidups. Then remove hidups, and rename newhidups to
> usbhid-ups
> > (name proposition welcomed, but should match the fact
2007 Mar 23
1
memory leak in newhidups 0.28 (2.0.3)
There is a memory leak in newhidups. After 23 days uptime it used 138M
memory. Apart from the memory leak, the system works ok.
Is there anything I can do to help fix this problem?
Tor.
[root@tophat init.d]# ps -unut v
PID TTY STAT TIME MAJFL TRS DRS RSS %MEM COMMAND
21122 ? Ss 1:35 0 69 137934 136800 27.0 /sbin/newhidups auto
21125 ? Ss 0:37 0