similar to: Disable optimization on basic block level

How do you disable optimization for a function? I ask because my application often compiles machine-generated code that results in pathological structures that take a long time to optimize, for little benefit. As an example, if a basic block has over a million instructions in it, then DSE can take a while, as it is O(n^2) in the number of instructions in the block. In my application (at least),

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, David Jones via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > How do you disable optimization for a function? > > I ask because my application often compiles machine-generated code that results in

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 5:30 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:06:36AM -0700, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote: >> Would be cool to create a suite of extreme inputs, maybe a special llvm >> test-suite module. This module would contain scripts that produce >> extreme inputs (long basic blocks,

Hi all I have to generate some test data for import in an sql database. The database is meant for web-based data entry in a study taking place in a german speaking region, so factor levels of the variables include umlauts. The variables in the dataframe t.muster are generated e.g. like this: t.muster$screening <- rep("ausgef?llt",50) and exported to a .csv file by:

We're running Dovecot 2.1.17 on Debian: # 2.1.17 (9efbc0731929): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-042stab078.27.debug i686 Debian 7.1 simfs and we're having this namespace configuration: mail_location = mdbox:/var/mail/%Ld/%Ln/mdbox namespace inbox { disabled = no hidden = no ignore_on_failure = no inbox = yes list = yes location = prefix = separator = .

Hello, I just installed Xen 4.0.1 on Ubuntu 10.04 dom0. After this i had Ubuntu 11.04 as Para domU. I tried to attach file based disk to the this domU. My command is: # xm block-attach Ubuntu-11 file:/root/ubunut-natty/Extra /dev/xvdb w there is no error on this. But inside the DomU i cannot see any disk xvdb. xend.log shows : [2011-10-25 16:27:32 14794] DEBUG

Does someone know how to tell mongrel_rails to read the public/system/maintenance.html file? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Has anyone had any experience with wireless LANs and Asterisk? We have and here are my impressions. We configured an Asterisk in the office as a precaution to see how it would work for our own retail customers. Our office is open space, about 800 sq ft. (20x40 area). We use Snom200 and Grandstream SIP phones. Using the latest Linksys wireless access point (WAP54g) and 3 wireless bridges

I was trying "quantreg" package, lm1 <- lm(y~x) rq1 <- rq(y~x) plot(summary(rq1)) #then got a warning says singular value, etc. but this line can be omited plot(lm1) #crash here It happened every time on my PC, Windows XP Pro Serv. Pack 1, Pentium(4) 3.00G. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi there, Dovecot's LMTP implementation and Pigeonhole Sieve already do support the <user><delimiter><suffix> format. RfC 5233, the Sieve subaddress extension, also offers <prefix><delimiter><user>. Could Docecot's LMTP and Pigeonhole be extended to that effect? Thanks & greetings, Paul

Hi, i try several possibilities adn looking in the archive, but didn't getting success to install j.lindsey's usefuel "library repeated" on my linux (suse9.0 with kernel 2.6.7,R.1.9.1) P.S. Windows, works fine Many thanks for help Christian chris at linux:/space/downs> R CMD INSTALL - l /usr/lib/R/library repeated WARNING: invalid package '-' WARNING:

Evening all: Thought I'd announce myself with a question about setting up sources.list to be able to begin download and install of R. Running version 7.10 of Ubuntu. (Tried 8.04 but found it slow and finicky with my hardware. Perhaps will try 8.10 or above, but that's a thought for another time.) Followed the notes on the R site and added the following lines to my sources.list: deb

Hi, I'm trying to add a new intrinsic to the ARM backend. The intrinsic should a custom comparison. To do so, I started with first defining the intrinsic in llvm/include/llvm/IR/intrinsicsARM.td: def int_foo_cmp : Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty], []>; The second step I did is adding a new pseudo instruction matching that intrinsic in lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstInfo.td:

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com>wrote: > On 05/14/2014 06:02 PM, Akira Hatanaka wrote: > > I would like to get feedback from the community on how I can speed up > the compilation of a function that has one huge basic block consisting of > over 150K instructions. It takes about 10 minutes for clang to produce the > object file

I'm trying to write a tablegen pattern to that matches a sequence of SDNodes and emits again an SDNode and another instruction. The pattern I've written looks like the folowing: def : Pat<(foo (bar GPR:$rs1), simm12:$imm1), (bar (BAZ GPR:$rs1, simm12:$imm1))>; foo and bar are SDNodes, BAZ is an instruction. In particular, bar is defined as follows: def bar :

Hi @ all Does anyone has some experience with PostgreSQL and RoR? Does it gives any disadvantages or problems with PostgreSQL? I have a webapplication, that manage (read/write) many records (no. 200''000 records) and I search a ideal database. Actually, I have two options: - MySQL / - PostgreSQL And now, I would like to ascertain a good solution... Thx, ribit -- Posted via

That's the least ambiguous subject I could muster. I'm relatively new to Asterisk and while I'm certain there is a way to do this, I'm unsure how. My question is this: How do I take an incoming call, put the person on hold, and in the background (i.e. while they are on hold) begin trying other phone numbers until someone answers? Example: Jane calls the Network Operations line.

Folks: I''ve uplaoded the B1.05 version of AWDwR. It fixes a number of reported errata (and a few that weren''t reported :), and adds two significant changes: 1. It now uses the new Active Record decimal -> BigDecimal conversion. I''ve personally been waiting for this for a long time, and I''m really happy it''s now part of core. However,

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 1:11 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>wrote: > Ok, I think I have a working pass that is based much more on what we've > talked about here. The patch is attached. I'd love to commit it soon-ish and > then start tweaking it based on feedback from you, others, and looking at > how it actually works in the wild. After chatting briefly

Thanks for the advice. My question is more on how to do this? Let me use a biology gene analysis example to illustrate: In biology, there are always some house keeping genes which differ little even at pathological conditions. We know that at different batches, there are external factors affect the measurements. For example, overall signal intensity might be different due to lab reagents. A