similar to: OCaml bindings

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny at gentoo.org> wrote: > W dniu wto, 29.08.2017 o godzinie 16∶52 -0700, użytkownik Hans Wennborg > via llvm-dev napisał: >> Hello testers, >> >> 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. >> >> There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes >> up, this is what the final release will look

On 03/29/2018 08:09 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > Hi, > > I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can > begin testing. > So far, I've only received 5.0.2-rc2 binaries from 2 testers. I am guessing this is due to the mix up with -rc1 and the fact that we don't normally do X.Y.2 releases. If you would like to test this release

Hi, I've fixed the version numbering and tagged 5.0.2-rc2. Testers can begin testing. -Tom

Hello testers, 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes up, this is what the final release will look like. Please test and let me know if there are any issues. Cheers, Hans

Dear testers, 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure we'll actually end up blocking on all of them. So depending on what comes up, this release candidate is probably pretty close to what the final release will look like (I'm still hoping for more release notes, though). I'm hoping we can get to

Hello all, I’m unsure of how the tests located in compiler-rt/test/builtins/Unit are run. They’re not attached to the cmake check-all target, as mentioned in compiler-rt/test/CMakeLists.txt:10, and they have no lit test suite associated with them. There is a shell script called “test” in test/builtins/Unit, but it hasn’t been touched since 2010, and make reference to no longer existing

Hi, I've tagged 6.0.1-rc3, which should be the last rc release. If every thing goes well, 6.0.1-final will be next Thursday. Testers please test 6.0.1-rc3 and upload the results. -Tom

W dniu wto, 16.10.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0100, użytkownik Rowland Penny via samba napisał: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:30 +0200 > "Zuzanna K. Filutowska via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Dear All, > > > > I have a setup with samba acting as active directory domain > > controller, DNS updates are done via bind DLZ. I have

W dniu wto, 16.10.2018 o godzinie 18∶52 +0100, użytkownik Rowland Penny via samba napisał: > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 19:37:21 +0200 > "Zuzanna K. Filutowska via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > W dniu wto, 16.10.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0100, użytkownik Rowland > > Penny via samba napisał: > > > On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 18:47:30 +0200 > >

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc2 was just tagged. I know we still have a bunch of open release blockers, but there has been a lot of merged patches and I'd like to find out what the status is. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. When uploading, make sure to use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory on the server. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs and

Hi, W dniu 29.05.2019, śro o godzinie 09∶55 +0200, użytkownik Peter Krempa napisał: > I understand, that it is not possible to make a snapshot of > > physical > > device, but it is enough for me to take snapshot of vda. How to > > force > > virsh to ignore sda ? > > --diskspec sda,snapshot=no now it works, thanks a lot! best regards Jarek

Dear testers, There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in a better state now. 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. Please test, let me know how it goes, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

On Wed, 2019-02-06 at 14:09 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 10:41 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > > > On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >

On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 16:13 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 02/05/2019 11:32 AM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: > > On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: > > > > On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via

On 02/05/2019 11:26 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 11:23 -0800, Tom Stellard wrote: >> On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The release_70 branch is ready for the 7.1.0 release. I have updated the

Hello! I have a guest with one qcow2 disk image (vda) and one physical partition (sda) from host. When I'm trying to get snapshot with: virsh snapshot-create-as ..... It fails with message: error: unsupported configuration: source for disk 'sda' is not a regular file; refusing to generate external snapshot name I understand, that it is not possible to make a snapshot of physical

On 02/05/2019 08:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 07:36 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The release_70 branch is ready for the 7.1.0 release. I have updated the >> version and pushed a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39427, >> which is the only bug we will be fixing in this release. >> >>

Hello, all. I'm a fairly new maintainer of Gentoo packages for LLVM and clang. I'm trying to improve the way LLVM is built on Gentoo, and that's why I'm wondering which of the build systems of LLVM is supported better. As far as I'm aware, LLVM can be currently built using one of the two build systems: - one built on top of autoconf with custom Makefiles, - the other one

On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 5 December 2016 at 19:56, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: >> I'd like to avoid 4.1 because of the potential for confusion about >> whether it's a major release (as it would have been under the old >> scheme) or a patch release. > > But if the versioning

Hi, I've tagged the 5.0.1-rc2 release, go ahead and start testing and report your results. -Tom