similar to: x86 and GPU backend support for irregular accesses

Hello, Can anyone help me with the default installation locations of CUDA headers in Windows and macOS ? e.g. /usr/local/cuda/include is the default for Linux. Thanks, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170522/ca97c66b/attachment.html>

Hello, My system hangs every time during last stages of building LLVM ( starting at 95% in a CMake build ) using CMake or Ninja, sometime close to the linking of llvm-dysmutil. Could you please suggest tips that could speed up the compilation ? Thank You, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Thank You Chen ! On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 5:21 PM 陳韋任 <chenwj.cs97g at g2.nctu.edu.tw> wrote: > Perhaps you can refer to [1]. Function name should be a global one. > > [1] http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#identifiers > > HTH, > chenwj > > > 2017-06-22 16:35 GMT+08:00 SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > >>

Hello, I'd like to know the format a function's name must conform to. Can I be pointed to LLVM documention that specifies the nomenclature for functions and other Identifiers as well (%registers, ModuleID etc.) ? Thanks, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, I issued the following command to point the build to use clang and clang++, from a local llvm build directory included in PATH, instead of /usr/bin/{cc,c++}, cmake -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=clang -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++ ../llvm_src The configuration failed with the error stating the compiler didn't recognize '-std=c++11' flag, whereas clang compiled a dummy c++ file with

Hello, I'm working on a project involving LLVM and keep shifting between the Debug and Release build by assigning different values to CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE in <llvm_build>/CMakeCache.txt and then building it. I wanted to know if this was a safe alternative to re-configuring the build after removing <llvm_build>/CMakeFiles/ and <llvm_build>/CMakeCache.txt. Thanks, Sanjay

Do the InitializeAllTargets*() routines call the initialisation routines of all targets even when only some are built ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170323/08bd52a0/attachment.html>

Hello, One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error, DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu !11 = distinct !DICompileUnit(language: DW_LANG_C89, file: !3, producer: "julia", isOptimized: true, runtimeVersion: 0,emissionKind: FullDebug, enums : !12) This was generated by verifyModule(*GPUModule,&(llvm::errs())From whithin PPCGCodeGeneration.cpp in Polly.

On Sat, Mar 11, 2017, at 07:34 PM, David Blaikie via llvm-dev wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 3:10 AM SANJAY SRIVALLABH SINGAPURAM via llvm-dev > < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > One of my Julia programs failed to execute with the following error, > > DICompileUnit not listed in llvm.dbg.cu > > !11 = distinct

Hal, Tobias, et al. – I am strongly in favor of seeing a broader range of loop transformations, supported by strong dependence analysis, added to LLVM, and the Polly infrastructure seems to be by far our best bet to make that happen. I have a couple of questions: 1) Integer constraint libraries like ISL (and Omega, which I used extensively in a previous project) are fundamentally solving

Thanks for the heads up Philip ! I did come across a strange case where LLVM allowed "%" to be a part of a function's name. This was in the context of my patch https://reviews.llvm.org/D33985, where I prefix the name of the source function and the Scop ( A special kind of Region that Polly can optimize, the name of the Scop is the name of the Region ) to the name of the PTX kernel

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017, at 20:49, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote: > [tying to original thread] > > On 09/04/2017 01:37 PM, Adve, Vikram Sadanand via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hal, Tobias, et al. – > > > > I am strongly in favor of seeing a broader range of loop transformations, supported by strong dependence analysis, added to LLVM, and the Polly infrastructure seems to be by far

** *Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of advanced loop transformations necessary to provide good performance on many applications. LLVM's Polly project provides many of the required capabilities, including loop transformations such as fission, fusion, skewing, blocking/tiling, and interchange, all powered by state-of-the-art dependence analysis. Polly also

A completely non-technical point, but what's the current "polly" license? Does integrating that code conflict in any way with the work being done to relicense llvm? Does adding polly expose any additional legal risks? Some people from Reservoir labs have explicitly stated to me that some of their patents target polyhedral optimizations. You should almost certainly review their

On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: > Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, > >> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> ** >> >> *Hi everyone,As you may know, stock LLVM does not provide the kind of >> advanced loop transformations

> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote: >> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others, >> >>> On Sep 1, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>> >>>

Has anyone figured out the way of getting the caller id for BSNL on Asterisk 1.4.2 I have tried following link http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6683&nbn=24 but was not able to get it, although did not ge any error too. I always get the caller id as asterisk. Can someone please help. Regards, Sanjay Rajdev

Hello, is it possible to rout ALL RTP Data over Asterisk, like SIP1 <---RTP---> Asterisk <---RTP---> SIP2 I know it seems quite useless. But I want to simulate a IAX -> SIP connection and have no Phonecard installed on my computer ;) Thanx, Kalle

What is the best alternative for getting the IVR and other prompts recorded for Asterisk. Regards, Sanjay.

I have a CISCO 7912 phone, the LED on the phone does not glow when there is new voicemail, can we configure Asterisk to have the LED glow on new Voicemail. Regards, Sanjay Rajdev