similar to: Running "different tests" on cmake based test-suite build

On 11/24/16 3:12 AM, Arnaud De Grandmaison via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi Sandeep, > > The CMake version of the test-suite has been improved (see > https://reviews.llvm.org/D21360) so that it’s easy to plug additional > test suites. A starting point would be to look at how the > TEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS variable in the top level CMakeLists.txt is used. > I think this bug report

Hi, Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note® 3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Date: 11/27/2016 7:49 PM (GMT-06:00) To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] LLVM Pass for Instructions in Function (error Hi, Please find the embedded code. Also you may follow

> On Nov 27, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Gurunath Kadam via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi Sandeep, > > Thanks. > > One question about: > > Value* AddrPointer = Inst->getIperand(0); > > So this works for LVALUE(S) i.e. in my case pointer on LHS of '='. I cannot find anything online about getloperand online. > > For reference

Dear community, LLVM test-suite includes both default applications (benchmarks, tests) and test harness (CMake modules, lit-support, some scripts, etc.). Test suite provides extension interface to add "external" tests suite and folders. This worked well, we enhanced basic harness and integrated large set of internal benchmarks and applications. However, we have users interested in LLVM

Hi all, I'm currently in the process of updating the Kaleidoscope tutorials (first and foremost, the ORC/BuildingAJIT ones), and I've noticed a fair few 404s which are lingering within the current visible documentation. Some of these don't seem to have linked to existing pages for a while. I was wondering if there was a way to set up a check in the buildbot to ensure that

Sorry for the bother Jim, but I'm calling on you again for guidance about llvm-gcc mentions. What should be done about the mention of llvm-gcc on <http://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html>? Can we just roughly s/llvm-gcc/clang/ ? Daniel, feel free to provide guidance as well. -- Sean Silva On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel.dunbar at gmail.com> wrote:

Unfortunately, LNT still uses the Makefiles underneath, and the Makefiles support a few users who use the more advanced hackery they support. We should keep it for the time being. - Daniel On Nov 14, 2012, at 13:30, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > The top of the file says that it is deprecated in favor of LNT. Is > this document still needed? It makes mention of

Hi Sean, On 14/11/12 23:53, Sean Silva wrote: > Sorry for the bother Jim, but I'm calling on you again for guidance > about llvm-gcc mentions. What should be done about the mention of > llvm-gcc on <http://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html>? Can we > just roughly s/llvm-gcc/clang/ ? Daniel, feel free to provide guidance > as well. to some extent llvm-gcc lives on

Hello all. I'm in need of a benchmark that can be compiled to IR or bytecode. I found the test-suite project (https://llvm.org/docs/TestSuiteMakefileGuide.html) and thought a benchmark in that project might work. However, I'm having trouble figuring out how to actually compile any of the benchmarks to IR or bytecode. Using cmake and make I can compile them to binaries, but at no point do

Patrick, how long does the crawl take? I suspect if we fixed internal documentation links so that they point to local copies of documentation when building locally it would be quite quick (no actual idea though). That in turn would probably make it feasible to add to the existing documentation build bots, I think. James On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 03:47, Neil Nelson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

Hi guys, I am following this[1] tutorial to install clang. However, I have made a small change in the configure command, and I am running it with '--enable-optimized' option to avoid the debug build. I am getting the errors (given at the end) related to *undeclared identifiers '__NR_*'*. Can someone please provide some input about how to tackle this issue? On my other machine, I

I'm not aware of a bug filed for this, so please file one. I don't know much about the workings of test-suite myself, though. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Much or all of "Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_*.test" (254 failures) seem to be > failing for me with SIGILL. I'm guessing that my host CPU doesn't support

The top of the file says that it is deprecated in favor of LNT. Is this document still needed? It makes mention of llvm-gcc as well... -- Sean Silva

For the following code below, the x-axis ticks are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 when I was expection them to be 1,2,8,9,10,11,12. Please help me figure out where is the mistake. library(lattice) testdata <- as.data.frame(t(structure(c( 1,2005,9.24,6.18,634, 2,2005,8.65,6.05,96, 8,2004,6.81,6.51,16, 9,2004,9.0,7.29,8, 10,2004,8.84,6.18,524, 11,2004,8.54,6.35,579, 12,2004,9.97,6.3,614, 12,2005,8.75,5.84,32,

Hi, my sip phone is unreachable for external network(global ip) Thanks, sandeep.s

There are a bunch of us working on LLVM in Austin. So we're organizing a LLVM Austin Social in September. The social will be on Wednesday, September 12 from 5 pm at the BB Rovers Cafe and Pub. It'll be great to meet up with folks in Austin who are also interested in LLVM. Please reply and let me know if you plan on attending so that I can get a count. BB Rovers is on Jollyville road

Hi, I am curious to know about LLVM IR as platform independent feature. I have compiler some C and C++ applications that compiled on Linux 64bit machine, now I want to generate bit code file on Windows 64bit machine. 1) Will this execute without any issues? 2) Do I pass any option for making it operating system portable? 3) Can I generate bit code file also on Linux machine and then run on

Hi guys, I am compiling some programs with clang which use a couple of libraries. When I compile with the command - "clang -O2 -I. -o hello -ldl -llttng-ust hello.c tp.c", it goes successful. My aim is to get the bitcode for these programs but if I try to generate the bitcode with -emit-llvm option, it produces linking issues as follows : (also at - http://pastebin.com/zkmL2SAH)

I am trying to configure puppet with LDAP repository . I have set puppet schema and I have also added node definition at LDAP. Here is my configuration details . ############################################################## Puppet.conf node_terminus = ldap ldapserver = 10.250.11.127 ldapbase = ou=Hosts,dc=xyz,dc=com ldapassword = secret

Please let me know your interest in following. Location: Columbia, SC Duration: 12 months+ Rate: $65/hr 1099/c2c Required Skills: RUBY, RAILS, GIT, MYSQL, CUCUMBER, RSPEC, JQUERY, EXCELLENT ORAL AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION SKILLS, TEST-DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT, LINUX, OS X, JSON, COMMAND LINE, SQL, SSH, HAML, SCSS Thanks Sandeep Sandeep Jain Software People Inc. www.softwarepeople.us