Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "New Phab dead slow on mobile"
2014 Jul 04
4
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> I don't like the lack attached patch files on the mailing list to do a
> normal review.
Wait what? The emails I get from phab *have* an attached patch file. That
was a hard requirement when we first set up Phabricator.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2014 Jul 01
2
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
On 7/1/14, 12:28 PM, Alp Toker wrote:
> Specifically the problem I've been seeing is that people using the website are
> unable to CC mailing list-based developers. As a result I don't get copied in on
> responses to my review comments, and rarely get any kind of direct mail with
> threading. You end up having to dig up historic responses in the mailing list
> archive which
2016 Nov 16
2
Highlighting trailing whitespaces on Phab?
On 11/14, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote:
> Ideally I’d even really like to have a both checking for revision on
> phab, clang-formatting them, and post a comment when there is a
> mismatch :)
I'd like that!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL:
2016 Nov 14
3
Highlighting trailing whitespaces on Phab?
When I create a patch, I run clang-format-diff, so that's fine. What I want
to do is to find trailing whitespaces in others patches.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> clang-format removes them.
> If you are (like me) likely to forget to run "git clang-format HEAD~”
> before pushing, adding a pre-commit (or
2014 Jul 09
2
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca
>> <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't like the lack attached patch files on the mailing list to do
>> a normal review.
>>
>>
2016 Nov 16
2
Highlighting trailing whitespaces on Phab?
So, I forwarded the request for highlighting trailing whitespaces to
phabricator upstream (https://secure.phabricator.com/T11879), and upstream
folks suggest we enable the Lint feature in Arcanist (
https://secure.phabricator.com/book/phabricator/article/arcanist_lint/). This
will enforce the check when `arc diff` is run (reviewers wouldn't see the
warnings though).
There are two linters we
2019 Nov 28
2
Logging in to Phab with a Google account broken for anyone else?
Hi,
I log in to Phab using my @chromium account with the "Log In or Register
Google" button on https://reviews.llvm.org/auth/start/?next=%2F . That has
worked fine for me, but now it fails with
```
Auth > Unhandled Exception ("Exception")
Expected to retrieve an "account" email from Google Plus API call to
identify account, but failed.
```
Is anyone else
2016 Nov 16
2
Highlighting trailing whitespaces on Phab?
Why isn’t it in the LLVM repo?
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 7:44 AM, Johannes Doerfert <doerfert at cs.uni-saarland.de> wrote:
>
> We have a clang format based arcanist linter (and some others) in the
> Polly repository. When arcanist is used to create a review, the linter
> result is shown online. We also have an arcanist add-on to run the lit
> tests and show their result in
2009 Feb 15
2
Collapsible Fieldset
Hey there,
(First steps in Ruby and Rails...)
I''m trying to make a fieldset collapsible, like they are, for example,
on many Drupal pages.
What I''ve figuared out is the following:
<fieldset id="addressdata" class="collapsible collapsed">
<legend>
<%= link_to_function("Show/Hide Addressdata") { |page| page[:
2014 Jul 01
4
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
On 01/07/2014 21:28, Alp Toker wrote:
> Specifically the problem I've been seeing is that people using the
> website are unable to CC mailing list-based developers. As a result I
> don't get copied in on responses to my review comments, and rarely get
> any kind of direct mail with threading. You end up having to dig up
> historic responses in the mailing list archive
2014 Jul 01
16
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
Alp noted that the current setup on how phab reviews land on the list are
not working for him. I'd be curious whether his setup is special, or
whether there are more widespread problems. If this is more widely
perceived as a problem, please speak up, and I'll make sure to prioritize
the fixes (note that this is unrelated to the "lost email" problem - those
are always highest
2019 Nov 28
2
Logging in to Phab with a Google account broken for anyone else?
Thanks for the reply. Typing in my username and clicking "Forgot password?"
got me a link I could use to log in.
It'd still be good if federated login worked again. Is there an upstream
issue for this?
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 5:09 PM Alex Brachet-Mialot <
alexbrachetmialot at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes this was broken for me too, there was another post on here about this
2005 Feb 07
7
New Docs - First Look
Ok, my first complete swipe for the new docs (but still with old rdoc
default output templates) can be seen at:
http://www.mktec.com/dev_www/wxruby-docs/
Most of the classes/methods documentation came out fine, but I still
need finetune because some methods don''t get documented at all, like
methods in the classes Bitmap and Frame.
Once I can get it so all things get documented
2014 Jul 06
2
[LLVMdev] Usability of phabricator review threads for non-phab-users
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 4:42 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote:
> Chandler Carruth wrote:
>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca
>> <mailto:nicholas at mxc.ca>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't like the lack attached patch files on the mailing list to do
>> a normal review.
>>
>>
2005 Dec 24
2
Where can I get a royalty-free/open-source spinner image?
Hi everyone,
Where can I get a royalty-free copy of the spinner.gif or some other
AJAX activity icon? I don''t want to swipe one without asking.
Thanks,
Jason
2009 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran test results
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with
> respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted
> by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results
> under Intel Darwin9 are appended below.
Yay! Thanks for testing this out.
> Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9
>
2009 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran test results
On Jan 19, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> === gfortran Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes 31739
>> # of unexpected failures 568
>> # of expected failures 12
>> # of unresolved testcases 12
>> # of unsupported tests 77
>
> For a first swipe, this probably isn't *too* terrible.
2006 Jun 05
3
Swap: typical rehash. Why?
I can't resist. Read the thread that was pointed to on lkml. ROTFLMAO.
*Real* UNIX addressed these problems long ago. I guess the "Gurus"
suffer from NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome.
Given a "general purpose" system, tunability is a must. UNIX, as
delivered by USL in such examples as Sys V, had tunables that let admins
tune to their needs. A single "swappiness"
2004 Sep 29
7
Credit Card machines / interop
Hi all,
One of the areas I am trying to research before I can confidently start
deploying Asterisk is "Credit Card Machines". (PDQ / Streamline machines
/ any similar)
I'm talking about the credit card swipe boxes at point of sale desks. I
believe they dial out to the specific bank provider everytime a card is
swiped.
My question is:
- Does anyone have any experience using
2015 Feb 25
4
[LLVMdev] Jump Theading/GVN bug - moving discussion to llvm-dev
>> all the zero paths from entry to %a pass by %b.
>
>
> That is a graph-wise definition, sure.
> So, this is an interesting definition, and maybe this is part of the source
> of the problem.
>
> For SSA, at least GCC requires that both "definition block dominates use
> block" (which would be true here), *and*
> that "definition appears before use in