similar to: Directory Server on CentOS 5

Hi, After manipulate my data I have ended up with 5 different data frames with different number of observations but the same number of variables (columns) An example, if I write str(object1), I see this, data.frame': 47 obs. of 3 variables: $ ORF : Factor w/ 245 levels "YAL038W","YAL054C",..: 10 19 38 39 44 45 50 51 59 60 ... $ mRNA : num 0.891 1.148 1.202

Hi, I have a data frame Y with the following information, ORF spectra 1 YAL001C 2 2 YAL005C 21 3 YAL007C 2 4 YAL012W 8 5 YAL016W 24 6 YAL019W 3 7 YAL020C 2 8 YAL021C 7 9 YAL022C 3 10 YAL023C 6 11 YAL026C 2 12 YAL029C 1 13 YAL031C 1 14 YAL035W 48 15 YAL038W 173 16 YAL041W 4 17 YAL042W 4 18

> On May 9, 2020, at 5:12 PM, Andrea Di Biagio via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The llvm scheduling model is quite simple and doesn't allow mca to accurately simulate the execution of individual uOPs. That limitation is sort-of acceptable if you consider how the scheduling model framework was originally designed with a different goal in mind (i.e. machine

(SuSE Pro 9.3, Samba 3.0.13-1.1) (I posted this earlier but didn't get much response so I'm trying again with a different subject line.) I have a Samba server set up on a Linux machine. I have four shares set up, not counting all those system things (homes, profiles, etc). When I access the shares from a Windows machine, the four shares show up like they're supposed to, in

Hi Alex, On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:00 PM Alex Renda <renda at csail.mit.edu> wrote: > Thanks, that’s very helpful! > > > > Also, sorry for the miscue on that bug with the 2/4 cycles — I realize now > that that’s an artifact of a change that I made to not crash when resource > groups overlap without all atomic subunits being specified: > > `echo 'fxrstor

Hello, I'm trying to evaluate the performance improvement of instruction scheduling on one of the inorder ARM processor, I was looking for ARM simulator and I found two (Simplescalar/ARM and SimIt-ARM) The code generated using llvm-2.9 and llvm-gcc and gcc 3.2. I used these command : $ llvm-gcc -O3 -o test1.bc -c --emit-llvm test1.c $ llc -O3 -o test1.s -march=arm test1.bc -mcpu=strongarm110

Hello, Is it Possible to create this fix for CentOS too? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243753 Solution: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2007-0676.html regards Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL:

Hi, I have a new mainboard with a Realtek RTL8111B / RTL8168B NIC. In 5.1 are no driver integrated for this nic, but there is driver disk: http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b and http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/RealTekRTL8111b?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=r8168-2.6.18-53.el5-i686-x86_64.img.zip Can I integrate this driver do the CentOS 5.1 ISO or can i use this

Hi list, Is it possible to set up an NFSv4/Kerberos environment on CentOS 5.1? I set up Kerberos and NFS but get several erros "Warning: rpc.gssd appears not to be running. mount.nfs4: Permission denied" Is this an CentOS oder an config problem? Greetings Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type:

[You can find an easier to read and more complete version of this RFC here <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?ts=5aaa84ee#> .] Knowing instruction scheduling properties (latency, uops) is the basis for all scheduling work done by LLVM. Unfortunately, vendors usually release only partial (and sometimes incorrect) information. Updating the

On 03/15/2018 10:04 AM, Guillaume Chatelet via llvm-dev wrote: > [You can find an easier to read and more complete version of this RFC > here > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?ts=5aaa84ee#>.] > > Knowing instruction scheduling properties (latency, uops) is the basis > for all scheduling work done by LLVM. > > >

Sounds like a very useful tool.  Thank you for contributing. Taking a step back and looking at the big picture, combining this with the recently contributed llvm-mca dramatically improves our scheduling and performance analysis story.  Being able to take a snippet of code on a particular machine, measure latency/throughput/ports for each instruction (this tool), and then analyze the entire

Hi list, I have a problem with mountig a DVD-RAM as a specific user and group. I mount with this parameters: #mount -t udf -o uid=33,gid=6,umask=0000 /dev/hdc /mnt/ #mount: /dev/hdc on /mnt type udf (rw,uid=33,gid=6,umask=0000) but a #ll /mnt shows: drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 256 Jan 29 10:03 data -rw------- 1 root root 11 Feb 2 10:52 info drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 40 Jan 29 09:02

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 03/15/2018 10:04 AM, Guillaume Chatelet via llvm-dev wrote: > > [You can find an easier to read and more complete version of this RFC here > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?ts=5aaa84ee#> > .] > > Knowing

Hi David, Thank for very much for your reply! I got a reply on the clang mailing list in April from Dmitri: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-April/065115.html and following his advice “attaching pragmas as attributes to functions” I managed to do it, it was actually quite easy. >>Compatibility with an existing compiler is usually compelling - are the compilers you're

Hi, I reinstalled puppet-server and am now getting these error messages from clients: err: /File[/var/lib/puppet/facts]: Failed to generate additional resources during transaction: No such file or directory - /var/lib/puppet/yaml/node err: /File[/var/lib/puppet/facts]: Failed to retrieve current state of resource: No such file or directory - /var/lib/puppet/yaml/node Could not describe /facts:

It is my pleasure to announce that LLVM 3.6 is now available! Get it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ This release contains the work of the LLVM community over the past six months: many many bug fixes, optimization improvements, support for more proposed C++1z features in Clang, better native Windows compatibility, embedding LLVM IR in native object files, Go bindings, and more. For details, see

It is my pleasure to announce that LLVM 3.6 is now available! Get it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ This release contains the work of the LLVM community over the past six months: many many bug fixes, optimization improvements, support for more proposed C++1z features in Clang, better native Windows compatibility, embedding LLVM IR in native object files, Go bindings, and more. For details, see

(SuSE Pro 9.3, Samba 3.0.13-1.1) I have a Samba server set up on a Linux machine. I have four shares set up, not counting all those system things (homes, profiless, etc). When I access the shares from a Windows machine, the four shares show up like they're supposed to, in addition to the system things. However, when I access the shares from a Linux machine, two of the four shares do not

Ooops, we did it again ... This release (4.7) has the first release notes on the wiki for a CentOS 4 release. And as always we could use some people to translate those :) We didn't find that many problems within QA, so the release notes should now be fairly complete, with limitied changes to them. ISo if you are interested and willing (you are, aren't you?), this is the place to edit: