similar to: Running LNT and the LLVM test-suite on Windows

There is no way this will work first try, but there is no reason this cant work with some fixups. We have not been testing it, so im sure there will be glitches. I'd start by running the test-suite with cmake, and see how it goes, then move on to LNT. On September 2, 2016 at 4:18:29 AM, Michael Kruse via llvm-dev (llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org(mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org)) wrote:

Dear Community members, I am trying to setup *lnt* on a system where I do not have sudo access. I am facing the following issue. Kindly suggest a solution. virtualenv version => 1.11.6 OS => Debian with kernel 3.16.7 *While installing lnt into a virtual environment, I am getting the following error -* *Processing six-1.9.0.tar.gz* *Writing /tmp/easy_install-ZBhMFI/six-1.9.0/setup.cfg*

I got Python 2.7.3 Sounds right? On Fri Aug 08 2014 at 4:45:01 PM Yi Kong <kongy.dev at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > I've never seen this error before. It looks like something to do with > virtualenv. > > What do you get by running `~/mysandbox/bin/python --version`? > > -Yi > > On 8 August 2014 23:48, Jingyue Wu <jingyue at google.com>

Hi Since the buildbot host was updated to Fedora F20 levels, the clang buildbot has been failing with the following: $ /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/lnt.venv/bin/lnt runtest --verbose --submit http://llvm.org/perf/submitRun --commit=1 nt --sandbox nt --no-timestamp --cc /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang --cxx /home/clangbuild/clang-ppc64-1/llvm.install.1/bin/clang++

On 3 January 2013 16:37, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > My only hesitation here is that using LNT as the authoritative runner > does have a little more setup overhead for people wishing to run the > suite (they need to install some extra stuff). > Yes, there is an issue on shared machines, regarding installing new software (mainly the virtualenv, since lnt

@Michel using virtualenv we can create an isolated environment in the system. Just go through - http://docs.python-guide.org/en/latest/dev/virtualenvs/ @Eric I'm using Ubuntu, and I was able to install and use libvirt using sudo apt-get install python-libvirt but its not available in tg2 virtual environment. Moreover if you try to install in the virtualenv using the sudo apt-get install

Hi, I followed the instructions on http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html, and got stuck on installation Step 4. ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop said running develop error: None and returned error code 1. The lnt binary wasn't installed anywhere. Any clue? Thanks much, Jingyue -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I'm on a Ubuntu 18.04 server, trying to use django-haystack with xapian in a python3.6 virtualenv. The virtualenv is set up not to use system packages, meaning that I can't just install python3-xapian-haystack with apt, and instead have to manually build xapian-core and xapian-bindings within the virtualenv. This works with xapian-core and the --prefix argument to configure. When I

I''m working on a module to handle creating and populating Python virtualenvs. Without going into too much detail, basically these are nicely-encapsulated environments into which python packages can be installed and run. It''s not uncommon to have several virtualenvs on a system, potentially with the same packages installed (maybe different versions). Puppet''s defines

All of our internal testers use LNT. LNT behind the scenes just calls the Makefiles appropriately. So it would be impossible to get rid of the makefile execution without gutting LNT as well = p. I will let Daniel comment on the rest of it. On Jan 3, 2013, at 6:55 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 3 January 2013 16:37, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>

On 3 January 2013 16:15, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Part of the issue here is whether or not the Make-based execution is > still maintained/valued. I'm getting the impression that the LNT > execution may be already, or be becoming, the standard way to run the > test suite even when not gathering perf statistics. Michael/Daniel - > is that the case?

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 3 January 2013 16:15, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Part of the issue here is whether or not the Make-based execution is >> still maintained/valued. I'm getting the impression that the LNT >> execution may be already, or be becoming, the standard way

On Sun, May 13, 2018 at 8:48 PM Bruce Hoult via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I recommend using https://github.com/llvm-project/llvm-project-20170507 if you can spare 1.1 GB of disk and bandwidth for the initial checkout and git repo itself. > It's just a few minutes behind the svn master copies. I don't know of a better monorepo at present. > Although

Hello, When I was running the LNT testing for LLVM test-suite, it failed to submit the results to database. The command is: lnt runtest --submit db nt --sandbox sandbox --cc clang --cxx clang++ --test-suite ./test-suite-3.2/ --llvm-src ~/projects/llvm/llvm --llvm-obj ~/projects/llvm/llvm_build/ --test-style=nightly --only-test MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/ When submitting the results

is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? if so, are there public build bots for this? is lnt going to replace test-suite as the normal mechanism for running test-suite? Tia. Reed

Hi all, I am running LNT with LLVM/Clang 3.0 Release binary and test suite, here is my flow (most of them are the same as http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html). --- $ svn co http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk ~/lnt $ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop $ cd mysandbox; source bin/activate $ $ lnt runtest nt \ --sandbox SANDBOX \ --cc

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > >> is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? >> > > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html > > > if so, are there public build bots for this? >> > > We have

On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html if so, are there public build bots for this? > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs

On 17 June 2013 19:01, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > There are several individual users who still use the full Makefile > infrastructure. I think we pretty much use LNT exclusively for automated > runs now, but for development purposes the Makefile setup still has various > features that make it more amenable to incremental development. > Hi Daniel, I have

> On May 12, 2016, at 11:21 PM, Elena Lepilkina via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > As we understood great changes will be done in LNT, so we are waiting to new LNT version and stopped our work in LNT. > > One more question about using test-suite separately with cmake. Cmake can only build all tests and generate lit tests. After that we