similar to: Basic Backend: Load Indirect

Hi Tim, >That C++ function is probably what looks for an FrameIndex node and >has been taught that it can be folded into the load. How do you teach a function that a node can be folded into an instruction? ________________________________ From: Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 21, 2019 11:52 PM To: Josh Sharp Cc: via llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev]

You have no dial-peer telling the router what to do with the outbound call. http://www.tape.net/~gerry/asterisk/cisco26x0.html At 12:50 PM 9/26/2003, you wrote: >Like Gerry wrote for callerid you need VIC-2FXO-M1 card. > >Right now I am stuck on making outgoing call. > >Could soembody help me with the configuration. > >On cisco I have soemthing like that: > >dial-peer

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1105 Bug ID: 1105 Summary: masquerade fully broken when no prerouting chain is created Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: other Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: kernel

Hi all, I am having some strange problems with samba on one of my fileservers. I am using samba 2.2.1a compiled with qouta support and the quota patches. Kernel is 2.4.9 with quota patches. Everything seems to work fine exept some very wired things: If I try to save a document from word 2000 to a samba share the file can't be read afterwards by word. The file is on the server I can copy the

Hi all , I have several File Servers running linux and samba 2.2.2 and since i upgraded i have a strange problem. I have compiled samba 2.2.2 witch quota support. nothing else special. I use samba in Domain mode. The following problem occures: Some of the users can't read files or directoris in their home directories. The windows explorer gets an timeout or sometimes even crashes. I can

Hi Alexander, Not sure if this of any help, but we had a similar problem with runaway SMBDs and what seemed to be oplocks. We are running RH6.2 with 0.7.26 ACLs. After much messing around and hassling Jeremy, I eventually changed the kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.2.20 and recompiled everything from scratch. Since then we have not had one of these rogue processes. I think Jeremy was right when he

Hello! With this email we release an extension to OpenSSH that was initially developed as project for our studies at the Univerity of Applied Sciences in Hagenberg. First we would like to describe the purpose of using Zero-Knowledge (ZK) for user authentication. Traditional authentication methods like challenge-response with passwords or public keys leak information about the credentials of

hi all, as i heard, i need winbind to connect linux-clients on samba. i installed this - without pam (in the hope this would work...) but this constellation seems to be needed, as i still cannot connect, even if winbind logs my domain as accepted. Do i really have to do the pam-configuration on the samba-server-side too?? i just thought, it was enough to authentificate against smbpasswd. is

Hi, After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program to something which sort of looks like tgsi. You can find my latest work on this here: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/llvm http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jwrdegoede/clang (the latter may still need to sync) I've a little test

Hi Tom, Thanks for taking the time to answer this. On 11-01-16 18:10, Tom Stellard wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:07:14PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After a few distractions I'm back to work on the llvm tgsi backend. I've >> added clang integration and I can now compile a simple opencl program >> to something which sort of looks like

Hello > I am wondering if the modification made to the DAG is causing a problem, and > can it be done at all? If I cannot do this, is there any other place I can > look at, to make this work. It's hard to tell w/o seeing the exact code / DAG. Note, however, that this assertion is seen on simple LLVM IR: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15053 So, it might be not your bug after

Hi, I am working on a small optimization feature to replace the calls with indirect reference using a memory with an indirect reference using register. The purpose of this feature is to improve the performance of calls to functions referred to by function pointers. The motivation behind this work is that gcc does this optimization. Here is a small test case, that will generate an indirect call

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97588 Bug ID: 97588 Summary: Disconnecting/Reconnecting monitor results in 'laggy' graphics and disappearing mouse cursor Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal

Commit 86781624 ("x86_emulate: PUSH <mem> must read source operand just once") corrected the operands of those of the operations of opcode extension group 5 that only read memory from SrcMem to DstMem, but failed to also switch the use of "dst" here to "src". Reported-by: Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich

Hi all, I am using package lavaan and have created a structural equation model with two exogenous and seven endogenous variables with the following relationships #specify the model m1 = ' # regressions D ~ ma + hs + b4 + b5 + b15 + b16 ma ~ hs + b4 + b5 + b15 + b16 hs ~ b4 + b5 + b15 + b16 b4 ~ el + la b5 ~ el + la

Hi Why is the quality of scaled textures/objects using --indirect-rendering much worse than direct rendering? Also, vsync does not work with indirect-rendering. I am using an Nvidia Geforce go 7300, with 97.55 drivers. Thanks, Matt

Hi Mark, On Thursday 18 December 2008, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index 5777196..2330c4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -70,6 +73,55 @@ struct vring_virtqueue > > #define to_vvq(_vq) container_of(_vq, struct vring_virtqueue, vq) > > +/*

Hi Mark, On Thursday 18 December 2008, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > index 5777196..2330c4b 100644 > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c > @@ -70,6 +73,55 @@ struct vring_virtqueue > > #define to_vvq(_vq) container_of(_vq, struct vring_virtqueue, vq) > > +/*

Hi! I note that chaining INDIRECT descriptors with NEXT currently is broken in lguest, because current ring index gets overwritten. It does not matter with current virtio in guest, but I think it's worth fixing: for example for when we have trouble locating a request in a physically contigious region. Makes sense? -- MST

Hi! I note that chaining INDIRECT descriptors with NEXT currently is broken in lguest, because current ring index gets overwritten. It does not matter with current virtio in guest, but I think it's worth fixing: for example for when we have trouble locating a request in a physically contigious region. Makes sense? -- MST