similar to: [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 2 has been tagged

When I tested rc1 I found that some of the test suite wouldn't build on SLES11.3 as a consequence of changes to the tests. At least some of the msan tests have been changed leverage features of glibc newer than is available on this platform. I asked about a minimum-required glibc but didn't hear back. Is the minimum required glibc for 3.9 different from 3.8? When I tried rc1 on

It's a test for the new interceptor for prlimit. It could be disabled with __GLIBC_PREREQ for 2.13+. On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > +Evgenii for msan. > > I suspect the community simply doesn't keep track of what glibc > version is required :-/ > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at

Thanks! Can you post the sha1's for the files you uploaded? Windows and Mac look good. Uploaded: ca26fbfabb54ac1f70776ab3a5503313ec518f18 clang+llvm-3.9.0-rc2-x86_64-apple-darwin.tar.xz 26d616e1355dc0802f90babbd5ea0b72abc0c0bb LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win32.exe 42363aeaff395d442f418d77b542a088b5b0658b LLVM-3.9.0-rc2-win64.exe Thanks, Hans On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Diana Picus <diana.picus

Dear testers, 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure we'll actually end up blocking on all of them. So depending on what comes up, this release candidate is probably pretty close to what the final release will look like (I'm still hoping for more release notes, though). I'm hoping we can get to

SLES11 binaries for rc3 uploaded. 55b63de8adc12c67eb11abcf1a5f7132cca59b4e clang+llvm-6.0.0-rc3-x86_64-linux-sles11.3.tar.xz On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers < release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Dear testers, > > 6.0.0-rc3 was just tagged, after r325901 on the branch. > > There are still a few open blockers, but I'm not sure

I'm not aware of a bug filed for this, so please file one. I don't know much about the workings of test-suite myself, though. On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > Much or all of "Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_*.test" (254 failures) seem to be > failing for me with SIGILL. I'm guessing that my host CPU doesn't support

Dear testers, 3.9.0-rc1 was just tagged from the 3.9 branch at r277207. This took a little longer than I'd hoped, but I think the branch is in a decent state now. There are still open merge requests and bugs, but I'd like to get the real testing started to see where we're at. Please build, test, and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know how it goes. I'll upload source, docs,

Dear testers, My list of blockers is empty, and there were no new problems discovered with rc3, so I have gone ahead and tagged 3.8.0-final [1]. Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For others following along: yes, this means 3.8.0 is complete, but it takes a couple of days to get the source and binary tarballs built. I will send the release announcement when everything's

Dear testers, The final version of 3.9.0 was just tagged (from the 3.9 branch at r280312). There were no changes after rc3. This took a little longer than expected, but on the up side that means it's had more time to be tested. Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For others following along: this means 3.9.0 is complete, but it will take a few days to get the tarballs

Thanks! Added to the release page now. PR44517 is marked as wontfix. Should we re-open it? PR44518 :-( Should we add this to the list or release blockers? On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 2:04 PM Diana Picus <diana.picus at linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > Uploaded ARM & AArch64: > a60394b6508a9b66043f221f87eb4e2f5859f918f46e406b2c1e942d50ead7dc >

Dear testers, Start your engines; 6.0.0-rc1 was just tagged. I know there are still open blockers and it's early in the process in a way, but I'd like to find out where we are. Please run the test script, let me know the results, and upload binaries. Thanks, Hans

Hello testers, 5.0.0-rc4 was just tagged. There were very few changes after rc3, and if nothing unexpected comes up, this is what the final release will look like. Please test and let me know if there are any issues. Cheers, Hans

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc5 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355909. This is identical to rc4 with the addition of r355743. Hopefully it is the final release candidate, so please give it a good testing. As usual, please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'll publish source tarballs and docs as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available.

We're very very close to the final release. Source and binaries for LLVM-3.9.0-rc3 are available at http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.9.0/#rc3 This release candidate is almost the same as rc2, with the following additional commits: r279224 - Minor change to OpenCL release notes r279260 - [lld] Add a note that 3.9 is a major milestone for us r279468, r279474 - Fix gather-root.ll SLP vectorizer

Dear testers, The final version of 8.0.0 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r356364. It's identical to rc5 except for a few documentation changes. Apologies for being behind schedule. It took longer than planned this time. Please build the final binaries and upload to the sftp. For those following along: this means 8.0.0 is done, but it will take a few days to get all the

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc3 was just tagged from the release_80 branch at r355015. We're running a little behind schedule now, but I think we're also close to be able to call this done. Please take a close look at this release candidate. Unless anything bad comes up, this is probably very similar to what the final release will look like. Testers, please run the test script, share your

On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 3:22 PM Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > > On 28 Jul 2020, at 19:49, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > We're a little bit behind schedule, but RC1 is now here. It was tagged > > earlier today as llvmorg-11.0.0-rc1. > > For this rc1, I used two patches, which are

Dear testers, Release Candidate 2 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and upload to the sftp. I know there are still outstanding issues from RC1, but there have been a lot of merges going into the branch and I think it's time for another round of RC testing. This RC comes a little behind schedule, sorry about that, but I'm still optimistic about hitting the target of releasing

Dear testers, 8.0.0-rc1 was just tagged (from the branch at r351980). It took a little longer than planned, but it's looking good. Please run the test script, share your results, and upload binaries. I'll get the source tarballs and docs published as soon as possible, and binaries as they become available. Thanks, Hans

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc2 was just tagged. I know we still have a bunch of open release blockers, but there has been a lot of merged patches and I'd like to find out what the status is. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. When uploading, make sure to use the /data/testers-uploads/ directory on the server. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs and