similar to: help please: how to sort the contents of a "SymbolTableListTraits<GlobalVariable>"?

Dear sir, Thanks for your reply. I apologize for taking a few days to reply. > Crashed how? Please see the below. > Have you turned on ASan? Not yet, but thanks for the suggestion. I guess I will try to rebuild my modified Clang+LLVM with addr. san. and see what happens. > I recommend attaching a minimal reproduction... Well, since I`m hacking on LLVM itself, this is not

On 08/04/2016 01:33 PM, David Majnemer wrote: > You should never be copying or moving around Values. Why not? Is that because of this thing you also wrote in the same message: "use lists are allocated before the object"? > An llvm::Value (which GlobalVariable is a subtype of) should exist only in the heap. Trying to sort a container of such objects doesn`t require me to

I recently upgraded from llvm 3.7.1 to a pre release of llvm (3.8.0rc2) in order to test some issues regarding bug 24233. After upgrading I starting to see heap corruption messages in vs 2015 sp1 when my program exits. "HEAP[ConsoleEngine.exe]: Invalid address specified to RtlValidateHeap( 0000000000290000, 0000000000318698 )" Initially I only got it in Release build. Debug build seems

I am confused by GlobalVariable::eraseFromParent's declaration: /// This method unlinks 'this' from the containing module and deletes it. void eraseFromParent(); In Globals.cpp the unlinking is done and SymbolTableListTraits cleans up the symbol table but I don't see anything that actually deletes the object. Is the comment misleading or am I missing something?

Hello, I am trying to mount a lustre filesystem thru an ib2ip gateway. The MDS''s have infiniband connections. The client nodes are tcp/ip connections. I am able to route between the client nodes and the MDS''s. I have the following in /etc/fstab: abe-mds1 at o2ib0,abe-mds2 at o2ib0:/home/client /abehome lustre _netdev,flock 0 0 I get the following when trying

Dear all, Howdy! ;-) This is Abe of the Samsung Austin R&D Center`s compilers team. As an early part of a project that should help performance on some CPUs, I would like to cause global variables [at least from C and C++ programs] to be grouped together according to their alignment needs, which should help to slightly reduce RAM requirements in some cases. IMO this should be done at

Hi, Can anyone tell me if there's a straighforward way to create a new BasicBlock without inserting it into a function's basic block list? I want to do this so I can create a forward reference to a block that's position in the function is not yet known. I've tried: Function function Builder builder; bb = BasicBlock::Create(function,...) bb.eraseFromParent() ... add other

Hi, I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got listed twice with pdbedit. (http://www.mail-archive.com/samba at lists.samba.org/msg109110.html) Without much hope in fixing it, I am planning to re-generating passdb.tdb on my PDC by: (1)exporting tdbsam to smbpasswd backend (2)delete passdb.tdb (3)re-import smbpasswd to tdbsam backend With the command `

Browsing through the new website... * Q - Does Asterisk Business Edition contain any additional features, fixes, or enhancements not found in the open source versions of Asterisk? * A - Digium remains committed to the open source model, and has based Asterisk Business Edition entirely on the open source tree. However, no single release of the Open Source version corresponds

I made the llvm::Function() constructor public (for testing purpose) and used the non-overloaded new. auto func = ::new llvm::Function(...) if (func) func->eraseFromParent(); And the heap corruption is gone! Did something changed in llvm::User::new between 3.7.1 and 3.8.0 ? I found a bug in llvm ? On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:10 PM, koffie drinker <gekkekoe at gmail.com> wrote: > I

I downloaded 3.8.0rc3 and I also have it in 3.8.0rc3. I did set a data access breakpoint on the first function ptr that causes the invalid heap. This would allow me to break whenever someone is touching that address. It did not show double deletes during debugging. Further more I managed to narrow it down to 2 function calls: // stupid code, but its just for triggering heap error auto func =

Hello experts, I heard that there is something called anonymous dtrace that would still be running when I do a reboot. Basically, I have the following problem: The /boot/solaris/bootenv.rc file in my alternate boot environment is getting modified when I reboot the machine after doing luactivate <ABE>. It happens only on init 6, doesn''t happen when I do a simple reboot. The set

Hello all Asterisk Users, This is my first post here. We are in a process of moving Dialogic 240/JCT-T1 from old voicemail server to Asterisk box. Which card drivers do we need? Please share experience if anyone have successfully configured Dialogic JCT-T1 card with asterisk? Only source proves that this card work with * http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2003-April/000244.html

Hi All - Anyone know if the "callpark" feature is in ABE? Is there a comprehensive list of the differences between ABE and the open source version? I've only seen a bullet-point chart which has no real detail. Thanks, Noah

Hi, I need to insert new instruction into every basic block like x=1 or while loop I tried this code, but it doesn't work Type * Int32Type = IntegerType::getInt32Ty(getGlobalContext()); AllocaInst* newInst = new AllocaInst(Int32Type,"flag", Bb); Bb->getInstList().push_back(newInst); the error: void llvm::SymbolTableListTraits<llvm::Instruction,

Hi all.. Im using ABE C3.2.1 version and here Im having the following issue with respect to T38 fax calls. Somehow asterisk when it receives Session modification request with the T38 Codec, is not forwarding the request to the other end. Also asterisk is responding with 200 Ok to this RE INVITE with an audio line rather an media line with image. The session id here strangely matches to that of

I found the root cause, but I don't know what's the best approach to fix it. Under windows, 64 bit, when a function is created the void *User::operator new(size_t Size) operator allocates space + Use*. In the Use* the HasHungOffUses is set to true. So the ptr to the use* is returned as new object. This ptr is NOT the ptr that was allocated by the system. For that ptr you need ptr - word

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthias Braun via cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Abe Skolnik" <a.skolnik at samsung.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "cfe-dev" <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 6:20:09 PM > Subject: Re: [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] improving

Dear all, I would like some help, please, with implementing Hal`s excellent suggestion, which I have reworded as below. Hal has confirmed a previous version of my rewording as a correct interpretation. [I made minor changes since then, e.g. for grammar.] [Abe wrote:] >> I think you [Hal] are suggesting something like this: >> 1) compile the program with FP fusion off,

Dear all, The below has been tested quite thoroughly by now, including performance-testing by the way of using a modified compiler that triggers the below while compiling at least an old part of LLVM ["Function.cpp"] and sorting a symbol table with >7000 global variables. Unfortunately, the optimization I have been working on for which I _thought_ I needed the ability to sort a