Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1100 matches similar to: "Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR"
2008 Nov 18
1
Getting error ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:
I have 2 .cpp files in two different directories in which I need to put DTrace probes. They are compiled into two .a libraries one after another. In the end they are combined to a single .so file. This sequence I can not change. I get an error "ld: fatal: symbol `__SUNW_dof'' is multiply-defined:". What is the solution for this?
Here is my simulation of real world problem in
2020 Sep 24
2
ORC JIT - Can modules independently managed with one LLJIT instance? + problems with ExecutionSession.lookup
Hey Lang,
I would be really happy to only have one LLJIT instance and using multiple JITDylibs. However… it seems like that I don’t know enough to use them. So I wonder…
1. When I add Module A to JITDylib A and Module B to JITDylib B – where will those look for undefined symbols? Will Module A for example: will it only search itself and the MainDylib? Or would it also search in JITDylib B?
2012 Mar 20
0
[LLVMdev] Runtime linker issue wtih X11R6 on i386 with -O3 optimization
I was told that my writeup lacked an example and details so I reproduced
the code that X uses and I was able to boil down the issue to a couple
of lines of code. Sorry again for the length of this email.
Code was compiled on OpenBSD with clang 3.0-release.
========================================================================
With -O0 which works as X expects:
2016 May 13
3
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR
>
> Any reason you're not using static archives? It seems to correspond more
> to what you're trying to do (i.e. LTO all the code in a single binary).
>
I just want to avoid modifying the application's build system. If there's
no other way, I could go in and change the build scripts, but I'd like to
avoid doing that as much as possible.
Tarun
-------------- next
1997 May 29
2
R-beta: WISH: For dyn.load()ing, I'd like is.loaded(.) , symbol.C, symbol.For
In S(plus), I can write functions using code fragments like
if(!is.loaded(symbol.C("my_C_fun")))
dyn.load("......../my_C_fun.o")
r <- .C("my_C_fun",
x = x,
n = n,
...
)
which I would like to have in R, too.
The S-plus help page on this subject says :
S+>> Code Availability
S+>>
S+>> DESCRIPTION:
S+>> is.loaded
2012 Oct 23
0
[LLVMdev] dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: fast lazy bind offset out of range
Hi Jack,
> It is interesting though that LLVMPolly.so shows the linkage...
>
> /sw/opt/llvm-3.2/lib/LLVMPolly.so:
> /sw/lib/libisl.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.0.0)
> /sw/lib/gmp5/libgmp.10.dylib (compatibility version 11.0.0, current version 11.5.0)
> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 169.3.0)
>
2006 Nov 16
3
Newbie problem ... Forest plot
Hello!
I have some data stored into 2 separate csv file. 1 file (called A.csv) (12 results named Group1, Group2, Group3, etc...) odds ratios, 2 file (called B.csv) 12 corresponded errors.
How to import that data into R and make forest plot like I saw inside help file Rmeta and meta with included different font colors and names trough X and Y axis.
I know for meta libb
...
out <-
2011 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp
I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html
and the exact error message is:
llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC)
/home/tarun/Desktop/compiler/LLVM/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h:
In member function ‘virtual
bool<unnamed>::ConstantPropagation::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&)’:
2011 Apr 17
4
[LLVMdev] Regarding BasicBlock Cloning
The clone llvm:CloneBasicBlock copies the phi function in the replicated
basic block from the original basic block.
I don't want the copy of phi in relplicated block. For now I am creating .bc
file with -O0 option so that it doesn't generate phi function in first
place. Is this a good approach or there are some other function available
for it.
Tarun
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Eli
2011 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:27 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote:
> I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is
> http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html
>
> and the exact error message is:
>
> llvm[0]: Compiling ConstantProp.cpp for Release build (PIC)
>
2011 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp
While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error.
error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant*
llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const
llvm::TargetData*)
Regards
Tarun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2011 May 03
2
[LLVMdev] Trace Use-Def chain
Hi,
I need to get all the basic blocks that are there, in the path from
definition of an instruction to use of that instruction.
Regards
Tarun
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110503/4d3852b7/attachment.html>
2011 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Trace Use-Def chain
On 5/3/11 4:08 PM, tarun agrawal wrote:
> HI
>
> I know it is a very simple question not worth asking here but I am
> really struggling pls help me out..
This is a question worth asking; it's just that not everyone can answer
all the time.
:)
If all you want to do is to follow the SSA def-use chain within a single
function, then this is very easy. All you have to do is use
2004 Nov 14
1
Samba cannot find group in ADS
Hello everybody,
I have a Samba 3.0.7-Debian setup and joined a W2k ADS-domain. A User is
put in "SambaUsers" as his primary primary group. I can create files
from XP client that belong to user in "SambaUsers" The user is
successfully authenticated by samba and can access his profile. I want
him to be able to access the share "p" on samba. Without "valid
2011 May 04
2
[LLVMdev] Trace Use-Def chain
Thanks John,
I know how to iterate through def-use chains and I also have realized the
need for an algorithm to do the work. But the algorithm I am able to figure
out is not linear in time. It wold be a great help if someone suggest me a
way to get all basic-block along all path between two instruction.
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 7:00 AM, John Criswell <criswell at illinois.edu> wrote:
>
2012 Feb 25
2
[LLVMdev] Algorithm used for doing alias analysis.
Hi,
I am using alias analysis to determine whether two values are alias or not.
But I am not able to figure out the algorithm that is being used to
determine
May , Must and No Alias.
Thanks and Regards
Tarun Agrawal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120225/e06daae7/attachment.html>
2011 May 03
1
[LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp
Hi
While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error.
error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant*
llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(
llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const llvm::TargetData*)
I am using llvm-2.6 and the ConstProp.cpp file is
http://llvm.org/docs/doxygen/html/ConstantProp_8cpp_source.html
and the exact error message is:
llvm[0]: Compiling
2011 Apr 16
3
[LLVMdev] Regarding BasicBlock Cloning
Hi,
I am writing a pass for constant propagation using graph restructuring (
code duplication). I am facing following difficulties..
1) I need to replicate the basic block but without phi function in the
replicated block. How can I do this.
2) I need to insert that basic block after and before some particular basic
block.
Regards
Tarun Agrawal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML
2011 Apr 17
0
[LLVMdev] Error compiling ConstantProp.cpp
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:07 PM, tarun agrawal <tarun at cse.iitb.ac.in> wrote:
> While compiling the ConstantProp.cpp I am getting the following error.
>
> error: too few arguments to function ‘llvm::Constant*
> llvm::ConstantFoldInstruction(llvm::Instruction*, llvm::LLVMContext&, const
> llvm::TargetData*)
If you're reporting a build error, please include the
2003 Oct 12
3
Is this Hardaware Enough for Asterisk ?
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20031012/59c113df/attachment.htm
-------------- next part --------------
Hello,
We are planning to buy following Hardware for Asterisk TestBed. Please let me know if this seems fine to you.
1. IP Phones ( 5 in number) CISCO 7940/7960, SNOM 200, Pingtel xpressa
2. Wildcard T100P interface card,