similar to: Clang project renamed

I second the motion. All in favor? On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Renato Golin via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 1 April 2016 at 18:50, Richard Smith via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > * The name has been used by a kickstarter project, causing incalculable > > confusion[0] > > Neal Stephenson has poetic license to do

On Apr 1, 2016 5:34 PM, "George Burgess IV via cfe-dev" < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > How are we casting our votes? Discordantly! > Will this be a standard yay-or-neigh format, or do people prefer an alternate method? > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:27 PM, Daniel Dilts via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I second the

Hi I would like to know how I can change the name of a model for each trainning cycle of a model. I work with the RSNNS package and to build a neural network, I used : for (i in 5:30) .... model_ANN <- mlp(X, Y, size=n,....) # where size is the number of neurons in the hidden layer but I need to save each time that the model that is build (the end of each cycle), e.g., when i = 5, I need to

Hi, The first (maybe) LLVM social in Beijing will happen on May 19th, 2018. Everyone interested in LLVM related projects is invited to join. Event details is at https://github.com/hellollvm/website/blob/master/README.md Presentations are welcome :-) Looking forward to meet you ! -- Best wishes, Wei Wu (吴伟)

Dear LLVM community, I am affiliated with the design and development of the Pony<http:/www.ponylang.org> programming language, which was recently published and has since been discussed on hacker news<https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9482483>, reddit [1]<http://www.reddit.com/r/ponylang>

Dear all I was wondering whether such a long post could be fortune-ed. What do you think? Regards Liviu On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Sharpie <chuck at sharpsteen.net> wrote: > Well, I can think of three ways it can go down: > > > 1. ?You want a shiny new pony. > > You ask about it on the mailing list and it seems that everyone else in the > world responds

Hello everyone, *Short version:*I've set up an LLVM Discord server for real time chat (similar to IRC) and an LLVM Discourse server for forums (similar to email lists): https://discord.gg/xS7Z362 https://llvm.discourse.group/ Please join and use these new services. They are only partially set up and still very new, so don't hesitate to improve them and/or reach out to this thread with

But is it better or worse than IRC in this regard? On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 10:49 PM Daniel Chapiesky via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: Daniel Chapiesky <dchapiesky2 at gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 1:48 AM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for >

FWIW I'm a fan of using open-source stuff for open-source projects. Discourse looks open source, but Discord doesn't as far as I can tell (?). On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:15 AM Chandler Carruth via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hello folks, > > I sent the message quoted below to llvm-dev@ just now, but it applies to > the whole community so sending an FYI

Hi Josh, On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 22:41, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Marek Peteraj <marpet@naex.sk> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > i'd like to ask what the best options are for safe 24bit 96kHz > > archiving. Currently i'm only using -8 but there are also some other > > options like block size etc. Can anyone suggest? > > I haven't heard of

Hi folks, I'm trying to get a handle on the many lossless audio formats from the perspective of a software developer. I love the FLAC format because it is open source and it performs very well. But there is also the MLP (Meridian Lossless Packing), AAC (Apple Lossless), and probably some Microsoft format(s) that compete in the same feature set. These formats all achieve

On Mon, 18 Nov 2019 at 07:29, Kristina Brooks via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > While I understand the difficulty regarding mailing lists especially > if one isn't used to setting up mailboxes and filters to classify and > label emails and do think a web forum may be easier to use, I would > have concerns over Discord. Unlike IRC which has a fairly open

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:32 AM David Tellenbach via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > +1 from my side for using "faster" or "more direct" communication channels > such > as Discord (no strong opinion on the choice of any particular tool here) > for > informal chats and discussions on a "support level". This is

On 11/19/19 9:09 AM, Zachary Turner via llvm-dev wrote: Note there is also Slack, which does not have these problems. Not sure why that keeps being overlooked My understanding is this is because Slack does not have good moderation tools. I'm unfamiliar with further details in this regard. -Hal On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 7:07 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at roblox.com<mailto:zturner at

The lists are working well for the people who are already invested in the community though - as was identified by Chandler they aren't working as well for new people. I'm an insanely confident Scotsman with just about zero fear of any/all social situations, and I've always found this mailing list to be utterly terrifying (thus I've been a 10 year mostly-lurker). My fear

Dear community, I have a problem with a string conversion: > text [1] "" "and" "\xc1d\xe1m" [4] "graphical" "interface" "MLP" [7] "Nagy" "networks" "Networks" [10] "neural" "Neural"

David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 12:18 PM Renato Golin <rengolin at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Nov 2019 at 08:44, Whisperity via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There *are* open-source Discord clients, 3rd party tools and the like. > > This is a big uphill fight that is rarelly worthy. Not to mention > privacy guarantees and terms and conditions

On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 11:55 AM David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 18/11/2019 16:39, Stefan Teleman via llvm-dev wrote: > > I can't recall an instance when I had difficulty using, or was > > intimidated by, email, for saying something on a mailing list. > > Subscribing to a mailing list, particularly one as high-traffic as >

> > | mailing lists for longer-form discussions are unfamiliar, difficult, > and often intimidating for newcomers > > Um… what? While I know (via my own children) that folks nowadays use > multiple avenues of communication, it’s **really** hard to imagine email > as a **mechanism** being unfamiliar/difficult/intimidating. Moving to a > new mechanism wouldn’t alter the