similar to: Is there a reason why MCAsmStreamer class doesn't have its own .h file?

Hi Craig and Rail, At Movidius, we have had to make a few changes to ‘MCAsmStreamer’ to support our assembler which is not ‘gas’ compliant. Earlier versions of LLVM (3.1 and 3.2) did have a separate header for ‘MCAsmStreamer’, and we had previously sub-classed this. The following are modifications that we have had to make because although ‘MCAsmStreamer’ does most of what we need,

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > I dont' know why its final. That routine is just a method to force the > current write pointer to a specific alignment. Shouldn't you be changing > the callers to give you the alignment you want or don't want. > > > > -- > ~Craig > It looks like the callers get their

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Craig Topper <craig.topper at gmail.com> wrote: > Isn't it also marked 'final' so it can't be inherited from anyway? What's > your need to inherit from it? > -- > ~Craig > Oops, missed the final part. I need to change the alignment. For my target it is sort of independent of the data layout. I was going to overwrite void

Hi all, I am emitting code for assembler which wants non-standard text for labels (not just "LABEL:"). One way would be to override all methods of AsmPrinter which call MCStreamer::EmitLabel but this is too painful. I can think of two solutions: 1) add AsmPrinter::EmitLabel which calls Streamer by default but may be overriden in target AsmPrinters 2) Register my own instance of

Here is the code <https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/c68dcdb413079d92118839dbd835e125293f411a/include/llvm/MC/MCInstrItineraries.h#L75> for InstrStage::getUnits() /// \brief Returns the choice of FUs. unsigned getUnits() const { return Units_; } This method returns an integer. How does one interpret it? As far as I see it it should tell me what resources are used by a given stage but

Hi, What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273: virtual void<unnamed>::MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel(llvm::MCSymbol*): Assertion `Symbol->isUndefined() && "Cannot define a symbol twice!"' failed. 0 llc

Hello everyone, In the file *lib/CodeGen/AsmPrinter/AsmPrinter.cpp*, I would like to obtain an MCInst corresponding to its MachineInstr. Can anyone tell me a way to do that? If that is not possible, then, I would like to know if a given MachineInstr is an *lea *instruction and I would like to know if the symbol involved with this lea instruction is a jump-table. For instance, given a

I'm writing a backend using a mid-October svn snapshot of LLVM. I'm having a hard time figuring out the relationship between my XXXAsmPrinter and MCAsmStreamer. Can someone explain what each is responsible for? Looking at the existing targets, the XXXAsmPrinter implementations seem to implement both the legacy "create a .s file" behavior, using printInstruction/printOperand/etc

Do something like this: bugpoint -run-llc <bitcode file> --tool-args -- <llc arguments> Cameron On May 23, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Arushi Aggarwal wrote: > Hi, > > What is the best way to debug an llc crash using bugpoint? > > I am getting the following crash that I would like to reduce > > llc: /home/vadve/aggarwa4/llvm29/llvm-2.9/lib/MC/MCAsmStreamer.cpp:273:

> No. Bundles with single instructions are not allowed, but bundles can be > mixed with instructions that are not bundled. > > -Krzysztof > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by The Linux Foundation > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >

Hello everyone, I'm a newbie of llvm. I'm trying to insert Intel MPX instruction BNDCU with BuildMI. I add my machinefunctionpass at addPreEmitPass2. Here is the code of insertion: BuildMI(MBB, MI, DL, TII->get(X86::BNDCU64rr)).addReg(X86::BND2, RegState::Define).addReg(X86::R10); And here is to stack track when I compiler program with modified llc:

On Sep 18, 2010, at 8:14 AM, Yuri Gribov wrote: > Hi all, > > I am emitting code for assembler which wants non-standard text for > labels (not just "LABEL:"). One way would be to override all methods > of AsmPrinter which call MCStreamer::EmitLabel but this is too > painful. I can think of two solutions: > > 1) add AsmPrinter::EmitLabel which calls Streamer by

You can have > > BUNDLE // 2 instructions in a bundle > instruction1 // > instruction2 // > instruction3 // single, non-bundled instruction > BUNDLE // another bundle with 2 instructions > instruction4 // > instruction5 // > > instruction3 is not bundled with anything, and it's between two other > bundles---that's what I

Chris, I want to emit code for target which uses non-standard assembler which wants labels to look like LAB nop instead of LAB: I can not do this because labels are emitted by MCAsmStreamer::EmitLabel which can not be overriden. Best regards, Yuri

My target has an instruction that adds up all elements in the vector and stores the result in a register. I'm trying to implement it in my compiler but I'm not sure even where to start. I did look at other targets, but they don't seem to have anything like it ( I could be wrong. My experience with LLVM is limited, so if I missed it, I'd appreciate if someone could point it out ).

This is just a cosmetic change in MCAsmStreamer.cpp/EmitSymbolAttribute: all attributes have now a \t before and after, as done for '.type'. This makes the output look consistent, as well as help some third party assemblers expecting the attributes to be in the second column. The patch applies cleanly on the svn head. Best regards, -- Arnaud de Grandmaison -------------- next part

Hi Rail, Below 2 revisions might be of your interest which Detect SAD patterns and emit psadbw instructions on X86.: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14840 http://reviews.llvm.org/D14897 Intrinsics related to absdiff revisons : http://reviews.llvm.org/D10867 http://reviews.llvm.org/D11678 Hope this helps. Regards, Suyog On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Dylan McKay <dylanmckay34 at gmail.com> wrote: > Try visualising the DAG like this. > > ``` > ---- GPR:$rA > / > set GPR:$rd ---- add > \ > ---- GPR:$rB > ``` > > Each instruction forms a DAG with its operands being subnodes. > >

> On Feb 1, 2016, at 16:53, Rail Shafigulin <rail at esenciatech.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM, Matt Arsenault <arsenm2 at gmail.com <mailto:arsenm2 at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2016, at 13:25, Rail Shafigulin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > >

> why in order to add this particular instruction (sum elements in a vector) I need to add an insrinsic? Adding intrinsic is not the only way, it is one of the way and user WILL-NOT be required to invoke It specifically. Currently LLVM does not have any instruction to directly represent “sum of elements in a vector” and generate your particular instruction.However, you can do it without