similar to: stack flag & generate ll from executable

Hi everyone, Both llvm-gcc and clang would use llvm as its backend. Dose everyone know the difference of bitcode generated by llvm-gcc and llvm? Or actually they are same, like if I use the same compiler options, like -O4. Any help is appreciated. Best, Yuxi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Tim, Thanks for your reply. I know O4 is same as O3 now. I am wondering the bitcodes generated by llvm-gcc and clang are same, or almost same, I mean they are almost same, but maybe some newly-created optimization would exert impact. Best, Yuxi ________________________________________ From: Tim Northover [t.p.northover at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 4:11 PM To: Yuxi Chen Cc:

On 6/20/16 3:46 PM, Yuxi Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for your reply. > But I still don't know how a transform pass updates a new analysis > pass after it modifies the IR. Can you explain it clearly? I am not > familiar with pass management and invocation. Passes can have methods that allow their internal state to be updated by other passes (the same way that their state

Hi, I want to copy some dependent statements, like a = b, b = c, from one basicblock to another basicblocks. Because of SSA, a = b, will be like %1 = load %b, store %1, %a. If I just use clone() method in Instruction class, it will be like <badref> = load %b, store <badref>, %a. If I need remap the virtual registers, this map just will affect the whole module? And how to use it? I am

Hi All, I am using clang to compile Mysql source code. Because I want to do some inter-procedural analysis, hopefully, I want to get a .o(bitcode) file(a module) containing all possible function declarations and definitions. Is it possible to do that ? Or you guys have some suggestions? To be clear, like Mysql, there is a mysqld routine, which is a major routine. I want to mysqld.o(which is

On 6/19/16 4:28 AM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On Jun 18, 2016, at 10:44 PM, Yuxi Chen via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> When I use llvm, I encounter a problem like "unable to schedule pass >> A required by C" >> I investigated deeper.

Hi all, I am newbie for llvm. I just create a global variable, there are some statements in my pass like: LoadInst* int64_64 = new LoadInst(pthreadPID, "", false, OptAplusOne); int64_64->setAlignment(8); int64_64->dump(); LoadInst* int32_65 = new LoadInst(gvar_int32_myFlag, "", false, OptAplusOne); int32_65->setAlignment(4);

Hi All, When I use llvm, I encounter a problem like "unable to schedule pass A required by C" I investigated deeper. It's like: I have three passes, say A, B, C(all are on function level) A would modify IR code. (change instruction order) For pass B, I would use the result of pass A, I use addRequired<B>(), and &getAnalysis<B>(), it works. void

I wouldn't normally post this to the asterisk mailing list but I'm really stuck... I've been trying to get meetme working on and off for a few months now but I always hit a brick wall when trying to compile. I keep seeing this... make linux26 cc -I. -O4 -g -Wall -DBUILDING_TONEZONE -DSTANDALONE_ZAPATA -DZAPTEL_CONFIG=\"/etc/zaptel.conf\" -c -o gendigits.o

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Taral <taralx at gmail.com> wrote: > > One piece of code I'm writing has a lot of intermediates, and I'm > trying to optimize down the number of memory accesses. Here's a > snippet from the start of the function, where I think there is some > low-hanging fruit: > > # BB#0: >        pushq   %rbp >        pushq   %r15

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 09:57:28AM -0800, Devang Patel wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On Jan 25, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > > > Doing that changes the error messages into a bus > > error on the darwin linker. > > > Pl. file bugzilla report (or radar) with a reproducible test case so > that we can investigate this linker crash. > > As you

Hi, all I use llvm-gcc -O4 to compile SPEC 2000, some benchmarks can't be built successfully, such as 164.gzip, 175.vpr etc. The error messages are as follows. .. zh.o unlzw.o unpack.o unzip.o util.o zip.o -o gzip bits.o: file not recognized: File format not recognized collect2: ld returned 1 exit status specmake: *** [gzip] Error 1 specmake options 2> options.err |

Hi, What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to get the best performance numbers on x86? Has anybody compared LLVM Spec2006 numbers with GCC 4.5 base? reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100719/40cf38a5/attachment.html>

FYI: I am trying to build zaptel-1.2.4 against the recently updated kernel version 2.6.9-34.EL on Centos 4.2. but I am getting errors and it will not build. This is apparently due to a typo in a kernel header spinlock.h although I have not successfully modified the kernel and built zaptel against it yet. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180568 This bug report has a typo

Hi, I'm running SuSE 9.3 fully updated using YOU and I *have* re-booted the box (in a hope to sort out the uname -r issue mentioned below). I'm using the Asterisk Doc Proj vol 1 to guide me through the initial setup. I have no special HW and intend to use asterisk on an internal network just to get some experience. I have downloaded what I think I need and placed it in /usr/src (see

Group Having trouble installing zaptel. Below is my server specs Intel Motherboard D101GGC TE405P CentOS-4.2-i386 Here is the output trying to do a 'make' =============================================== make clean rm -f torisatool makefw tor2fw.h radfw.h rm -f ztcfg torisatool makefw ztmonitor ztspeed zttool zttest fxotune rm -f *.o ztcfg tzdriver sethdlc sethdlc-new rm -f

Hi, I'm still strugling with getting an easy to use conference system implemented. I did have app_conference running, but today I upgraded asterisk to 1.0.9 and it stopped working. I've tried following the instructions for compiling app_conference on 1.0.7 but it didn't work. So I went back to ztdummy (I've not had any luck getting this to compile on FC2). Anyhoo, I've

have just updated the sources from cvs when i compile zaptel i get following error can help me ? nicolas snip.... zaptel.c: In function `zt_ctl_ioctl': zaptel.c:3042: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type zaptel.c:3044: warning: assignment from incompatible pointer type zaptel.c:3052: error: structure has no member named `close' zaptel.c:3053: error: structure has no

Chuck, Thank You I'm also going to try CentOS 3 The problem is I have SATA HDD and running in to trouble getting Linux installed. Will update after I test Ver 3 -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Bunn Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 12:45 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List -

Have anybody experience with the following error on a linux system. The system is for the rest running perfect without problems. The system was full installed with Suse 9.1 and updated. Following uname is my kernel 2.6.5-7.104-default Greatings Han Suse 9.1 professional AMD Atlhon XP 2200 Asus A7V600-X bios 1005 1Gb memory 400Mhz Geforce MX 4000 64MB 40 GB Harddisk