similar to: RFC: Second draft of an LLVM Community Code of Conduct

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. For a long time, various members of the community have been enforcing basic reasonable and respectful behavior, but to an outsider this may not be obvious. A public code of conduct advertises the behavior we expect of community members and

On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 8:24 PM, Pasi Parviainen via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 14.10.2015 23:36, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > >> * **Be welcoming.** We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports >> people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not >> limited >> to members of any race,

> On Oct 13, 2015, at 2:45 PM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > +1 to the general idea of a CoC > > A couple of specific thoughts: > > 1) It would have been nice for this not to appeared out of thin air. In an ideal world, a previous update would have mentioned ongoing thought and research in this area. > Some back story here. I

On 13 October 2015 at 16:41, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> - *Be welcoming.* We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports >> people of all backgrounds and identities. This includes, but is not limited >> to members of any race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, colour, >> immigration status, social and economic class, educational

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few

On 6 May 2016 at 22:21, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> How many is "many, many", actually? How many of these are really in fear, how many are just trying to impose their mindset without actually planning to contribute in earnest, how many are so fearful that they should really seek professional help? > > And this is illustrating my

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:20:33PM +0100, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 19:30, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> wrote: > > For some of the reasons we at least need to make it clear the scope: > > http://adainitiative.org/2014/02/18/howto-design-a-code-of-conduct-for-your-community/ > > Seems like a very personal opinion, and most

On 05/06/2016 09:02 AM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Say what you want about the Linux kernel community, but you can't >>> call >>> it immature. You can call the behaviour of some of its people >>> immature, but the community itself is not by a long shot. >> But there are reasonable people who will not interact with that community because

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 2:06:30 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct > > On 5

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Kees Cook wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:27 AM Jarkko Sakkinen ><jarkko.sakkinen at linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> In order to comply with the CoC, replace **** with a hug. I hope this is some kind of joke. How would anyone get offended by reading technical comments? This is all beyond me... Thanks, Davidlohr

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 13 October 2015 at 18:59, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > We have *not* appointed any such committee at this point. > > (...) > > The appeal is to the board of the Foundation. I don't expect the board to > > *be* the committee

On 5 May 2016, at 12:14, Charles Davis via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > The last sentence of the third paragraph bothers me: > >> In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces may affect >> a person's ability to participate within them. > ​This essentially gives the committee carte blanche to police our thoughts no matter where we

Am 06.05.2016 um 01:26 schrieb Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev: > > There are > many many people who aren’t even commenting at all because they fear > being attacked in this thread. Now you're contradicting LLVM's own description that it's a friendly community. Also: How many is "many, many", actually? How many of these are really in fear, how many are just trying

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:35:07PM -0400, Aaron Ballman via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 13 October 2015 at 16:41, Rafael Espíndola <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >>> - *Be welcoming.* We strive to be a community that welcomes and supports > >>>

LLVM Community, The LLVM Code of Conduct has been in draft mode for several years now. In order to finalize the Code of Conduct, there are 3 steps left to complete: Draft an Incident Response Guide. This guide is intended for someone who is considering reporting a potential code of conduct violation. You can view and comment on the proposed guide here (or by email if you prefer):

Am 13.10.2015 um 12:52 schrieb Renato Golin via llvm-dev: > On 13 October 2015 at 02:42, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> On behalf of the board of the LLVM Foundation, I’d like to start the process >> of introducing a formal code of conduct for the community. > > Hi Chandler, > > I agree we need such guidelines, and I truly

What unmitigated bullshit. Your attempt at logic is laughable. You hold up threadbare stereotypes as the norm, when in reality they are little more than characters straight out of Central Casting. The "genius hermit who can't associate with people" is dumb and false. It's meant to excuse behavior that is unacceptable, when in reality a person who cannot interact with people is

On 6 May 2016 at 22:57, Tanya Lattner <tanyalattner at llvm.org> wrote: > The major weapon of harassers is arguing whether something is actually > harassing. It is difficult to enforce a CoC if you have to have a month long > nasty argument about whether it was violated. It burns out people like you. The major weapon about enforcers is *not* wanting to argue. Harassment is a very

On 10/14/2015 01:25 PM, Chandler Carruth via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:02 PM Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org > <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > > On 14 October 2015 at 20:35, Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Related specifically

On 05/06/2016 11:03 AM, Jonathan Roelofs wrote: > > > On 5/6/16 11:43 AM, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> >> On 05/06/2016 09:02 AM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev wrote: >>>>> Say what you want about the Linux kernel community, but you can't >>>>> call >>>>> it immature. You can call the behaviour of some of its