similar to: llvm:cl::parser subclasses final in 3.7?

I'm back working on my threading patch for the LLVM JIT after being distracted by a paper deadline. I think I have things working nicely on Mac OS X (I just did a CVS up and it will take another hour or two to build), but I'm having an issue with building on Linux. Specifically, "lli" fails to link because it now needs to link against libpthread, because it ends up pulling

When I ran configure after updating, I get various errors. First: % ../configure --enable-jit --with-llvmgccdir=/home/llvm/cfrontend/x86/llvm-gcc checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking build system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.2.1 checking host system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.2.1 checking target system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.2.1 test: Unknown: bad

On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 11:47 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > > It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be > > merged into 1 class? > > > I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more. llvm/Support/ThreadSupport.h is not generated anymore? -- Alkis

Hi, when I updated the sources today there were several small problems that stopped the windows version from compiling, here are the patches m. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: win32patches.txt URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20041115/34634455/attachment.txt>

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:48:45 -0700 Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > When I ran configure after updating, I get various errors. First: > > % ../configure --enable-jit --with-llvmgccdir=/home/llvm/cfrontend/x86/llvm-gcc > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking build system type... i386-unknown-freebsd5.2.1 > checking host system

I use dovecot, vpopmail. I wish to restrict a mail user's login to its mailbox according to its ip address. I don't wish other users to be affected . Namely, for instance, abc at domain.com can login to its mailbox from a few specific ip addresses but the same user will not able to login from anywhere. Meanwhile normally other mail users can login to their mailboxes from all ip

It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be merged into 1 class? -- Alkis

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be > merged into 1 class? > I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more. Reid.

I'd like to write an inter-modular analysis pass. My understanding is that this should take the form of an LTO pass. However, I have been unable to find any resources on the mechanics of writing and running a custom LTO pass. Does anyone have any pointers? Thanks, Steve -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi guys, I''m doing some hackish stuff with manually installing RPMs. Basically I''m pulling them down to /tmp and installing them using provider => rpm, then making the service check that the package is installed before it''ll start. Here are the relevant sections of the pp file: class tomcat inherits httpd { $tomcat_connectors_pkg = $architecture ? {

Hello I installed postfix, mysql, dovecot on freebsd7.3. Yet I can't start dovecot service. I get some errors; Apr 4 17:03:14 postfix dovecot: auth(default): Fatal: Socket already exists: /var/spool/postfix/private/auth Apr 4 17:03:14 postfix dovecot: dovecot: Fatal: Auth process died too early - shutting down How can I get rid of that ? # dovecot --version 1.2.10 # postconf -a

On Feb 8, 2005, at 21:36, Chris Lattner wrote: > That is correct. If you try to run threaded programs in the JIT, it > might run into problems if multiple functions need to JIT functions at > the same time. This should be very simple to deal with, we just > haven't had anyone take up the task yet. Only the JIT is affected > here, not the static code generator or C

Hello Everybody, I would like to use Dovecot on my desktop with imap but before doing the real migration I have some (very simple) questions: - Is there any way to log in with imap automatically ? That is, from localhost without any passwords. - Can Dovecot work with only readable maildirs? I want to avoid accidental e-mail loss, therefore on some maildir folder I have only read permissions.

Los mejores estudiantes de Villa Mella : Vendo Laptop,PC y Celulares DUAl SIM a buenos precios llamar al cel 809-991-0776 -------------------- Hola entra y veras que bueno que es ser buen estudiante de villa mella Click the link below to Join: http://mejoresestudiante.ning.com/?xgi=1pC0XcQ If your email program doesn't recognize the web address above as an active link, please copy and paste

Hi David: I'd actually like to use a custom parser in a tool I'm developing, parsing YAML files. The partial fix for my purposes was: --- a/llvm/include/llvm/Support/CommandLine.h +++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Support/CommandLine.h @@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ extern template class basic_parser<float>; //-------------------------------------------------- // parser<std::string> //

https://llvm.org/docs/CommandLine.html#writing-a-custom-parser describes how to implement a custom parser, but they're all marked `final`, so I can't inherit. Is there a reason for this? If not, I'll submit patch with tests. thanks... don -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

For a bit of an experiment I've been trying to compile LLVM & Clang with -Weverything (disabling any errors that seem like more noise/less interesting). One warning I've recently hit a few instances of is -Wweak-vtable which is, in fact, an explicitly documented LLVM coding standard ( http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#ll_virtual_anch ). Some instances of this have been easy to

Tried that just now, same result. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:58 AM, Snehasish Kumar <kumar.snehasish at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Russel, > > Can you try compiling aklo.o using -fno-rtti prior to linking? > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Russell Wallace via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm trying to link a program with LLVM on Linux.

All, Is there any particular reason we don't use cl::ZeroOrMore more pervasively with the cl::opt class of command-line options? 1. Some of llvm's optimizations are enabled/disabled by llvm command-line options. Passing these options to our build system via CFF and CXXF result in redundant CL options. If the CL option is a cl::opt which defaults to cl::Optional, a warning is emitted.

This is what I was trying to do when I ran into the HowToUseJIT problem. I've made a first attempt at adding locking to the JIT. Unfortunately, since I do not really understand the structure of LLVM, I could have very easily screwed something up. I touched two classes, the JIT and the ExecutionEngine. I need some help from someone who is more familiar with the code to make sure that I