similar to: complexity of "mem2reg"?

According to http://llvm.org/docs/CMake.html, "Shared libraries are not supported on Windows and not recommended in the other OSes". The problem is that static libraries have some limitations, especially when linked into multiple shared libraries, the global data of llvm could have multiple copies leading to undefined behaviors. This has caused much pains during my usage of llvm. My

I have a function in llvm ir as follows: def [2 x [3 x double]] @fun() { return [ ... ]; // a [2 x [3 x double]] constant } I would like to JIT this function in C. I first get the void pointer using: void *FPtr = TheExecutionEngine->getPointerToFunction( func ); Then I need to conver this void pointer to the corresponding C function pointer type, and then call the function

Bug is reported with test cases. see http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15124 . Thanks, -Peng On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Anton Korobeynikov < anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Has anyone seen this problem before? and is there any fix or work around > > for that? > Please provide a testcase and fill LLVM problem report into bugzilla. > > Thanks! >

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Peng Cheng <gm4cheng at gmail.com> wrote: > I have a function in llvm ir as follows: > > def [2 x [3 x double]] @fun() > { > return [ ... ]; // a [2 x [3 x double]] constant > } > > I would like to JIT this function in C. > > I first get the void pointer using: > > void *FPtr =

Hi All, In my recent work using llvm to build a jit engine for a language, I saw some warnings and bug in the llvm headers. I made the fix locally and it works well. I am wondering how I could submit the fix back to llvm? Thanks, -Peng -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I have an llvm ir, which generates the following machine code using llc (llvm 3.0 on win32) after # *** IR Dump After X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection ***: The first three lines and the last two lines alone together are used to compute "sin" for some double number. - line 1: move the stack pointer down 8 - line 2: copy the updated stack pointer to a base register - line 3: copy a

Hi Peng, Can you please open a bugzilla and attache the LL file ? Can you please reproduce it on ToT ? Thanks, Nadav On Feb 7, 2013, at 9:08 PM, Peng Cheng <gm4cheng at gmail.com> wrote: > I have an llvm ir, which generates the following machine code using llc (llvm 3.0 on win32) after # *** IR Dump After X86 DAG->DAG Instruction Selection ***: > > The first three lines

Hi, I have an ir at the end of this email. Run it with: llc -mcpu=i386 -march=x86-64 -mattr=-sse2 and get assertion below. Changing cpu does not help. I am using llc from the latest svn repository. Any suggestions to work around this? I need to disable sse2 instructions for x86-64. Thanks, -Peng -----error message------ llc: X86FloatingPoint.cpp:332: unsigned int getFPReg(const

Dear R users,I'm a new user of R. I'm trying to do a LM test an there is this type of error: Error in t(mX) %*% mX : requires numeric/complex matrix/vector arguments. To be clear I write down the code in which mY ( 126,1 ) mX (126,1) mZ(126,1) are matrix. LMTEST <- function(mY, mX, mZ)#mY, mX, mZ must be matrices!#returns the LM test statistic and the degree of freedom{iT =

Hi, Suppose 'x' is a vector of length n and 'y' is a vector of length m, I am wondering what the time complexity of 'match(x,y)' is. Is it n times m? Regards, Peng

Hola, Acabo de calcular tf-idf y me surge una duda. ¿Habría un valor de idf o tf-idf que se considerara como umbral para establecer que una palabra es muy común o no? Los valores de idf en mis datos van entre 0 y 3.78 y los de tf-idf ente 0 y 0.07. Un saludo El Mar, 28 de Abril de 2020, 12:53, Carlos Ortega escribió: > Hola, > Yo de primeras los quitaría para qué otros topics aparecen.

I came in to an email this morning that said basically the same thing for the reduced example we were looking at. However, the original IR it came from (before hand reduction) had the data layout set correctly, so there's probably still *something* going on. It's just not what I thought at first. :) Philip On 09/10/2014 02:26 AM, Roel Jordans wrote: > Looking at the -debug

Hi, I''m confused about managing field boosting ... I have set the :boost for the :name field in my docs to 10, via :boost => 10 Then I performed a search for ''keith'' over all fields via with *:(keith*), expecting a doc with Keith in the :name field to come out on top. But another doc with Keith mentioned in other fields (:comments, :address) scored higher. I

Buenos días, Estoy realizando un análisis de topic models con el método LDA. En principio, he quitado del análisis las palabras "stopwords" universales. A la hora de ver los topics y sus palabras más frecuentes encuentro que son muy similares y hay palabras que aparecen en todos los topics. Los textos que estoy analizando son opiniones de consumidores sobre una categoría concreta de

Tf-idf is most used used weighting scheme is easy to understand and has been used in other frameworks like lucene and many other places. okapi bm25(implemented in xapian) is theoretically better/improved measure than tf-idf and i am looking into various other weighting scheme which are there in xapian or can be implemented like TF-ICF(term frequecy inverse corpus frequency),TF-RF(term

df is a very large data frame with arrival estimates for many flights (DF$flightfact) at random times (df$PredTime). The error of the estimate is df$dt. My problem is that I want to know the prediction error at each minute before landing. This code works, but is very slow, and dominates everything. I tried using split(), but that rapidly ate up my 12 GB of memory. So, is there a better R way of

Hello guys.I just read up about tf-idf schemes and want to implement it in Xapian (with some frequently used normalizations) as it will also give me a good hang of implementing a weighting scheme before I start working on implementing DFR schemes. I read the following as references and I think Ive understood it well and can write the hack :- 1.)

Hello list. I recently moved to an AD environment. I'm still keeping a samba servers to make my cups-managed printers available to windows users, rather than duplicating configuration with a Windows print service. But I'm facing two problems, probably due to the way we manage AD. First, all my host belong to a Unix-managed DNS domain (msr-inria.inria.fr), not to the windows-managed

Hello Everyone, I am a second year graduate student at IIIT-Bangalore and my interest is in the field of Information Retrieval. I have successfully compiled Xapian from source and have implemented some examples. While going through the project list Weighting Schemes project is the one I was looking to contribute to. So i went through the xapian-core/weight where most of the schemes are already

Hello, I'm Shivang Bansal, a 3rd year Computer Science Engineering undergraduate at Institute of Engineering & Technology in Lucknow, India. This mail is an expression of my interest for Google Summer of Code program of this year. I want to apologize for getting in so late. Actually I would have contacted earlier, but sudden demise of my Grandfather disabled me in doing so. I am