similar to: Print the Binary Form of an Instruction

Hi all, I have implemented AsmParser, CodeEmitter, and ELF object writing. AsmParser and CodeEmitter are tested and working fine, but I would like to see ELF objects build out of a parsed asm file. Is that possible? I tried this commands, but it didn't work corrctly: *llvm-mc -filetype=obj -arch=test file.s -o=a.o* and I think after an obj file is built, I should use this command but I am

Dear all, I am trying to write an AsmParser and a CodeEmitter for simple ADD instruction. Here is what I have in the TestGenInstrInfo.td: *extern const MCInstrDesc TestInsts[] = {...{ 23, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0x0ULL, nullptr, nullptr, OperandInfo13, 0, nullptr }, // Inst #23 = ADD8_rr...}* I parse the instruction successfully but I am not sure what I did wrong that the Size (as you can see in

Hi all, is it possible in TableGen to set value to instruction bits based on the operands? In other words, parsing the instruction at the TableGen level. for instance: "add $Rd, $Rn, $imm" I want to have something like this: *Inst{8} = ($Rn == Test::A0) 1 : 0;* Is there any way to do that in TableGen? If not is there any example in the provided example codes? Cheers, ES

Hi ES, From what I understand instruction parsing is divided into two parts: - Parsing an operand list (XXXAsmParser::ParseInstruction) - Turning the operand list into an actual instruction (XXXAsmParser::MatchAndEmitInstruction) The second part does the validation (e.g. how many operands, what kind, etc) while the first part only does the parsing. That's why I think in the first part

Hi all, I am trying to compile with a minimal TestAsmParser class, but I get the following error. ---------------- [43/780] Linking CXX executable bin/llvm-mc FAILED: : && /usr/bin/c++ -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-missing-field-initializers -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wno-comment -std=c++11

I am attempting to lower the selectCC instruction to the instruction set of the backend I'm working on and I cannot seem to find a way to correctly implement this instruction. I know how this instruction should get implemented; I just have yet to find a way to do it. I want the select_cc instruction to be lowered into a comparison followed by a conditional move. I've attempted to use a

Hi all, I am trying to implement an instruction with no operand for example "clr" in TableGen. ----------------------------------------- e.g. *InstrInfo.td:* class TestInst<string opc, string asmstr, dag oops, dag iops, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction { ... } def int_no_operand : Intrinsic<[]>; class ALU<string opc> : TestInst<opc,

Dear all, I have written an assembler which reads assembly instructions and produces the equivalent binary. I have a problem. Although I set the bit range and immediate type for an instruction like add which accepts a register and an immediate value, I can simply overflow that value and llvm/tablegen doesn't care! for example for a i8imm imm value (bits<8> val) these two produce the

Hi, Just realized that ability to generate static object code (e.g. ELF w/o using JIT) is no longer available in 2.7 (at least in release_27 branch). For example > llc -filetype=obj whatever.bc doesn't work in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully implemented before but it worked for simple bytecodes in 2.6). I used to generate code by creating TargetMachine and

On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 6:14 PM, Villmow, Micah <Micah.Villmow at amd.com> wrote: > I am attempting to lower the selectCC instruction to the instruction set of > the backend I'm working on and I cannot seem to find a way to correctly > implement this instruction. I know how this instruction should get > implemented; I just have yet to find a way to do it. I want the select_cc

On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > Chris, > > The basic idea of using templates inconjunction with inlining is for > efficiency. > > 6,500 virtual calls outputting bytes out of 10000 calls, and the > rest 1,750 being words to output 10,000 of code does not entice me > to use virtual calls. I understand that you say that, but I can't bring myself

On May 30, 2013, at 11:35 AM, Jafar J <pluck90 at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jim, > > The idea of reducing the switching activity between the instructions works by reducing the hamming distance between tow consecutive binary strings across the basic block, or reducing the number of the different bits between two consecutive instructions. This is why I need the exact complete

Hi all, I have just updated most of the patches to roll them forwards to LLVM top-of-tree, and incorporated various suggested changes. We're still looking for reviewers, if anyone is interested. Thank you, Edward Jones On 15/09/16 17:12, Ed Jones wrote: > I have now posted the final two patches for the backend to add > Disassembler support, ISel and CodeGen. The full list of patches

2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> > > On Jul 16, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Aaron Gray wrote: > > Chris, > > The basic idea of using templates inconjunction with inlining is for > efficiency. > > 6,500 virtual calls outputting bytes out of 10000 calls, and the rest 1,750 > being words to output 10,000 of code does not entice me to use virtual >

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Aaron Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/16 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> >> Whats Daniels approach, does he have any online documentation or code, do >> you have an email address so I may talk to him. >> >> Take a look at how asmprinters work >> in include/llvm/Target/TargetRegistry.h .

On Mar 26, 2010, at 6:24 PM, Peter Shugalev wrote: > Hi, > > Just realized that ability to generate static object code (e.g. ELF w/o > using JIT) is no longer available in 2.7 (at least in release_27 branch). > > For example >> llc -filetype=obj whatever.bc > doesn't work in Linux environment anymore (well it wasn't fully > implemented before but it worked

Hi Developer, While generating CodeEmitter.inc I got following error which i am attaching as screen short as follows Please help me guys. If you want other info I will provide you guys Thanks and Regards Varun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161028/29ec72e6/attachment-0001.html>

Hi everyone, I am getting into the ARM specific relocation for MC/ELF, and have some questions There are some x86/arm specific relocation values already, before they are lowered down to ELF reloc types (i.e. ARMRelocations.h and X86Relocations.h) As near as I can figure it, the relocation constants in (ARM|X86)Relocations.h are used only in ARMCodeEmitter, and X86CodeEmitter.cpp respectively -

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:30:29PM -0700, Qiuyu Zhang wrote: [snip] > push %eax > das > clc > > all of them are legal one-byte x86 machine instructions. [snip] > If there is a way to be able to get that, I am supposed that like > the following, > > 1. generate some dummy BB on IR level ( working on *.bc by writing a

GCC-style inline assembly is notoriously hard to write correctly, because it is the user's responsibility to tell the compiler about the requirements of the assembly (inputs, output, modified registers, memory access), and getting this wrong results in silently generating incorrect code. This is also dependent on register allocation and scheduling decisions made by the compiler, so an inline