similar to: [LLVMdev] [PATCH][RFC] HSAIL Target

> On Jun 22, 2015, at 9:31 AM, Rafael Espíndola <rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > This part is scary. > > Having a third party library dependency is very undesirable from a testing perspective. > > I agree, but it’s what we are stuck with for now. It’s an optional dependency now, so most people building LLVM won’t need to worry about it > > One of

Hello all, The rich history of binary distribution formats based on LLVM [0][1][2][3][4] has proven LLVM's viability as a launchpad for stable platforms. However, issues with compilation time and compiler size have suggested that the translator must do too much, i.e. LLVM IR isn't a low-level enough virtual machine. So we introduce DAGIR ("dagger"), a new portable close to the

On 11/15/2014 12:08 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > Can you send a plain-text version of this email. It's easier to read > and reply to. Sorry about that! Here's the plain text (I hope!): Hi all, OpenCL 2.0 introduced the notion of memory scope in atomic operations to global memory. These scopes are a hint to the underlying platform to optimize how synchronization is achieved. HSAIL

Hi Mr. Liu, Thanks for your quick reply. I compiled the code with the libclc_trunk and linked the bitcode file under $LIBCLC_DIR/built_libs/tahiti-amdgcn--.bc. After looking into the libclc, it is currently using the new workitem intrinsics (commit ba9858caa1e927a6fcc601e3466faa693835db5e). In the linked bitcode ($LIBCLC_DIR/built_libs/tahiti-amdgcn--.bc), it has the following code segment,

Hi... I've been fighting this for a while now, trying clean builds of Asterisk 1.14.18, 1.14.19rc3, and then 1.6 Beta 6 today. No workee. :-( Here's the results for various calls made off-hook (push the blue Speakerphone button on the Polycom 430): 988852700 - Phone waits for me to either hit the soft-key "Send" or "EndCall". If I hit "Send",

On 11/19/2014 4:05 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Sahasrabuddhe, Sameer > <sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com <mailto:sameer.sahasrabuddhe at amd.com>> > wrote: > > 1. Update the synchronization scope field in atomic instructions > from a > single bit to a wider field, say 32-bit unsigned integer. > > > I

On 1/8/2015 1:55 AM, Philip Reames wrote: >>>> I think the problems aren’t so much that accessing 0 doesn’t work >>>> (although I imagine there are problems with that), but expectations >>>> of comparison with null. The main problem I’m aware of is >>>> comparisons with null pointers. The first global object in >>>> addrspace(3) will

Ke, I'll be the bearer of bad news here. The radio silence this proposal has gotten probably means there is not enough interest in the community in this proposal to see it land. One concern I have with the current proposal is that the optimization value of these scopes is not clear to me. Is it only the backend which is expected to support optimizations over these scopes? Or are you

... Since I got no answers to my previous post about "forgotten" printer drivers that is printer drivers that disappear after you reinstall a samba and brig back all .tdb from back-up I said what a hell let's try adding the printer drivers again. You guessed, it didn't worked. After asking me for the printer driver location XP ws returns a message that "Operation could not

Hello: I need to build a system like this for a client: I will have a Linux server in a data room. It will have a web interface where the users may upload files. The files may be: Word, Excel, PDF, tif files, etc. Now, using the web interface, they should be able to brig up a list of files, select a set to print and send them to a local printer that is running as a shared printer on a Windows

> On Jan 7, 2015, at 3:10 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > > On 01/07/2015 12:05 PM, Matt Arsenault wrote: >> >>> On Jan 7, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com <mailto:listmail at philipreames.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 01/07/2015 11:52 AM, Matt Arsenault wrote:

On 1/7/2015 8:59 AM, Chandler Carruth wrote: > > Essentially, I think target-independent optimizations are still > attractive, but we might want to just force them to go through an > actual target-implemented API to interpret the scopes rather than > making the interpretation work from first principles. I just worry > that the targets are going to be too different and we may

<digitmap =20 dialplan.digitmap=3D"[2-9]11|0T|011xxx.T|[0-1][2-9]xxxxxxxxx|[2-9]xxxxxxx= x x|[2-9]xxxT" dialplan.digitmap.timeOut=3D"3|3|3|3|3|3"/> Don't think it's been modified from the original supplied. ...brig -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf

Through converting a miRNAs file from FASTA to character format I get a vector which looks like the following: > nml [1] "hsa-let-7a MIMAT0000062 Homo sapiens let-7a" [2] "hsa-let-7b MIMAT0000063 Homo sapiens let-7b" [3] "hsa-let-7c MIMAT0000064 Homo sapiens let-7c" [4] "hsa-let-7d MIMAT0000065 Homo sapiens

Hi all, LLVM needs a solution to the long-standing problem that the IR is unable to express certain semantics expected by high-level programming languages that target GPUs. Solving this issue is necessary both for upstream use of LLVM as a compiler backend for GPUs and for correctly supporting LLVM IR <-> SPIR-V roundtrip translation. It may also be useful for compilers targeting

Hi, When I look at the summary of an rpart object run on my data, I get 7 nodes but when I plot the rpart object, I get only 3 nodes. Should the number of nodes not match in the results of the 2 functions (summary and plot) or it is not always the same? Look forward to your reply, Carol -------------------------------------------- ?summary(rpart.res) Call: rpart(formula = mydata$class ~ ., data

Hello list. I have a vector of values: eg > head(diff_mirs_list) [1] "hsa-miR-26b" "hsa-miR-26b" "hsa-miR-23a" "hsa-miR-27b" "hsa-miR-29a" [6] "hsa-miR-29b" and I would like to conditionally replace each value in this vector with a number defined in a dataframe: > fc ???????????? Probe ave.fc 1?????? hsa-let-7a?? 1.28 2?????

I have the following vector of strings (shown only the first 3 elements) > desc[1:3] [1] "hsa-let-7a MIMAT0000062 Homo sapiens let-7a" [2] "hsa-let-7a* MIMAT0004481 Homo sapiens let-7a*" [3] "hsa-let-7a-2* MIMAT0010195 Homo sapiens let-7a-2*" > is.vector(desc) [1] TRUE > A <- unlist(strsplit(desc[1:3], " ")) > A [1]

Hi, There is a question that I am confused. I have a set of data like this: hsa-miR-205--GATA3 0.797882767 1.08E-13 hsa-miR-205--ITGB4 0.750217593 1.85E-11 hsa-miR-187--PGF 0.797604155 3.24E-11 hsa-miR-205--SERPINB5 0.744124886 3.28E-11 hsa-miR-205--PBX1 0.734487224 7.89E-11 hsa-miR-205--MCC 0.72499934 1.80E-10 hsa-miR-205--WNT5B 0.717705259 3.33E-10 hsa-miR-200c--PKN2 0.721746815