similar to: [LLVMdev] Mails from IITH marked as spam

Hi Devs, I am Kamlesh Kumar,CS undergraduate at NIT Manipur,India. I have been programming in C/C++ for more than 3 year. I have gone through various LLVM Core libraries and it's tool as well implemented it in my project .I am well aware of core concepts related to LLVM and it's code base, I have read three books available at Safari Online Books 1. LLVM - Essentials 2. LLVM - Cookbook 3.

Hi Dangeti, Ramakrishna, Adam, and Gerolf, >Yes this is an area that needs further improvement. We have some immediate plans to make these more useful. See the recent llvm-dev threads [1], [2]. It takes a lot of dedicated effort to make vectorization report easier to understand by ordinary programmers (i.e., those who are not compiler writers). Having done that for ICC ourselves, we truly

What are the various option we have in setting tmp dir. I can't use the default var/tmp, and I am looking to pass the dir during compiler invocation as an arg. any help is great. Thanks Ramakrishna -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160324/263cba7a/attachment.html>

Hello, Thanks to people who responded to previous mail! Is there a way in which we can stop further sourcing of an R file? i.e., i am sourcing an R file and keep an equivalent of 'exit' in it and run the code till that point? Thanks again Regards Ramakrishna

Dear LLVM Community, I am D Tharun Kumar, masters student at Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, working in a team to improve current vectorizer in LLVM. As an initial study, we are studying various benchmarks to analyze and compare vectorizing capabilities of LLVM, GCC and ICC. We found that vectorization remarks given by LLVM are vague and brief, comparatively GCC and ICC are giving

Hi, LLVM will look for the following environment variables to be set, and if not it will use /var/tmp: TMPDIR, TMP, TEMP, TEMPDIR You should be able to override its behaviour by setting one of those. Cheers, James On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 at 11:21 Ramakrishna Mallireddy via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > What are the various option we have in setting tmp dir. > >

On 8/8/19 2:03 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: Hi, First, as a high-level note, you posted a link to a Google doc, and at the end of the Google doc, you have a list of questions that you'd like answered. In the future, please put the questions directly in the email. For one thing, more people will read your email than will open your Google doc. Second, having the questions in the email should allow a

Hello all, We are students from Indian Institute of Technology(IIT), Hyderabad, we would like to propose the addition of the following pragmas in LLVM that aide in (or possibly increase the scope of) vectorization in LLVM (in comparison with other compilers). 1. ivdep 2. Nontemporal 3. [no]vecremainder 4. [no]mask_readwrite 5. [un]aligned Could you please

> There is a fundamental problem with the way that ivdep is defined by Intel's current documentation, at least for C/C++. As you note in your Google doc, it essentially says that the optimizer may ignore loop-carried dependencies except for those dependencies it can definitely prove are present. These are not semantics that any other compiler can actually replicate, and is not equivalent to

> On Oct 10, 2016, at 2:50 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > > From: "Dangeti Tharun kumar via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> > To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Cc: "Santanu Das" <cs15mtech11018 at iith.ac.in <mailto:cs15mtech11018 at

Dear community, Our team at IITH have been experimenting with loop-distribution pass in LLVM. We see the following results on few benchmarks. clang -O3 -mllvm -enable-loop-distribute -Rpass=loop-distribute file.c clang -O3 -mllvm -enable-loop-distribute -Rpass-analysis=loop-distribute file.c TORCH

Ugh, that would be a “yes” then… -- Krzysztof Parzyszek kparzysz at quicinc.com<mailto:kparzysz at quicinc.com> AI tools development From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev Sent: Friday, September 27, 2019 10:05 AM To: Dangeti Tharun kumar <cs15mtech11002 at iith.ac.in>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [EXT] Re:

Hello, Can anyone help me with the default installation locations of CUDA headers in Windows and macOS ? e.g. /usr/local/cuda/include is the default for Linux. Thanks, Sanjay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170522/ca97c66b/attachment.html>

Greetings, (I am reposting this email of mine, as I was informed that emails from the domain 'iith.ac.in' are sometimes being marked as spam) I am Aradhya Biswas, final year student of Computer Science and Engineering at Indian Institute of technology Hyderabad (IITH), and as mentioned in my previous email on the LLVM dev mailing list, I am interested to work towards the improvement of

vecremainder/novecremainder: Should the pragma simply call the vectorizer to attempt to vectorize the remainder loop, or should the vectorizer use a different method? > > Something like that. There were patches posted at some point to enable tail-loop vectorization. At this point, I imagine that you'd construct a VPlan with the vectorized tail. Yep, committed in

The Loop Optimization Working Group had a survey about “canonical” loop required by each loop transformation or analysis. That is, what should we normalize a loop before running a certain loop pass. Here is the survey result: https://tinyurl.com/rhuzny2 (Note that there are two workspaces: “By precondition” and “Breakdown”) Best - Min > On Dec 22, 2019, at 2:40 AM, Shraiysh Vaishay via

Hi all I am relatively new to LLVM and I am still trying to work my way through. What I am trying to implement is a list of array access and indices of the same within loops. I can then probably try to work on dependencies they can have. I have already got all the Basic blocks in a loop and I am looking at load & store instructions to reconstruct array access (casting GEP instructions). I

On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:21 PM Dean Michael Berris <dean.berris at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 8:43 PM Dangeti Tharun kumar > <cs15mtech11002 at iith.ac.in> wrote: > > > > Hi Dean, > > > > I have tried with -instr-map-1 and -instr-map-2, it didn't work. > > > > Yeah, I'm looking through the code and it looks like

Hi, Hopefully the video Michael posted will help you, thanks for posting. It's more useful to the user of these passes than the developer I guess (it describes the theoretical background, hurdles of the implementation etc.). But the two passes we describe, DependenceAnalysis and MemorySSA, have very clean interfaces so you shouldn't have a problem in that matter. You probably want to look

Hi all, What kind of input loop is expected for the loop-access pass to run smoothly? Also, what passes (like mem2reg) should be run to ensure the desired form is attained. Is running mem2reg, indvars and loop-simplify enough for that? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks and regards, Shraiysh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: