similar to: [LLVMdev] multithreading and the JIT, specifically llvm::sys::Memory

Currently the LLVMbugs list only receives emails when a new bug is filed or an existing bug gets finally resolved. The gcc-bugs list on the other hand receives an email for every new comment in bugzilla. This leads to much better transparency, because you can easily see which bugs are currently being worked on; while the current LLVMbugs setup left you totally in the dark. So my suggestion would

I was surprised, given the vector-ish nature of R, to see that (according to my CPU meters) there doesn't seem to be any obvious multithreading in R. Are there any plans to change this?

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:27:54AM +0300, Maxim Kozover wrote: > I'd like to ask you, please, about multithreading with libguestfs. > I'm using libguestfs 1.36.4 with Perl front-end. > > Should it be possible to have the same libguestfs appliance provide both > fuse interface and periodically perform some longer APIs like find0? > > I mean make one Perl thread do

Hello , I'm new to R and don't really understand how to use the function "apply" instead of a "for loop", particularly for a function with multiple entries. I have a big data file and would like to apply a function in multi thread to accelerate the processus. I have a data frame containing values of* CO2 in ppm (resp[i,6])* that I want to convert in umol of CO2

I noticed that the statically linked ogg/vorbis libraries for Windows are multithreaded. I want to link them into a non-multithreaded application, so I'm considering recompiling them to use the non-multithreaded C runtime. Is this feasible, or do libogg and libvorbis rely on multithreading? <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage:

Dear list, is R capable of multithreading? At the moment it uses only 1 CPU out of 4 CPUs on my system. Is there a compilation option or start option so that R uses multiple CPUs at the same time to accomplish a calculation? Some information on my system: > R.version _ platform x86_64-pc-linux-gnu arch x86_64 os linux-gnu system x86_64,

we people are new team for ruby. we trying to put multithreading in our code. how is it possible? we want to read a message from queue and process that message parellaly and finally insert the message to the DB. Can you give me the Idea please. we want to process 7000 to 10000 message and store it to the Database perminute. we are trying through threads. can you please help me how we do?

Hi folks, is it possible to read more things about R behavior in multiprocessor / multihost environment ? Is there any distributed computation project associated to it ? Laurent

Hi All, I have looked through the following thread: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/help/02b/4551.html and would like to ask after 1.5 year the same question: Are there any plans to involve multithread computations in R? Few word about my motivation: I use R on my OpenSSI cluster with 7 CPUs, so one could simply think of this cluster as of single computer with 7 CPU. My

Hi, where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this and perhaps next year? Especially would be interesting to know about * planned features for PS3 Cell processor -- as well as for Wii, Xbox360 CPUs * multithreading in general * possibly coming changes in major versioning and related issues * other interesting featuring comments on current status to above listed items are also

Hi. I need to execute a function from within a GUI. This seems to be no problem but this function takes about 4 minutes to finish, which means the application doesn't react at all, while the function is running. Can I execute a function as a separate Thread, while keeping control(e.g. a reference) of it at the same time? If not, how do this with a class containing this function? thanks,

Hi Valery, On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:15 +0200, Valery Khamenya wrote: > Hi, > > where could one find any LLVM development roadmap for this > and perhaps next year? About the best "roadmap" we have is the list of enhancements in Bugzilla:

On Apr 12, 2020, at 2:23 PM, Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> wrote: > > Yes, the llvm::Smart* family of locks still exist. But very few places are using them outside of MLIR; it’s more common to just use plain std::mutex. > > That said, I don’t think it’s really a good idea to use them, even if they were fixed to work as designed. It’s not composable: the boolean

Hi Ralph, Thank you for your reply! For context -- we consider reported CVEs as bugs even if it's in a third-party library we use (such as libvorbis). We first determine if the CVE is something that would impact our customer workflows. In this case because of our use of libvorbis for audio I/O, it does impact our customers so we need to resolve the CVE as soon as possible. In the

Hi all, I was looking at the profile for a tool I’m working on, and noticed that it is spending 10% of its time doing locking related stuff. The structure of the tool is that it reading in a ton of stuff (e.g. one moderate example I’m working with is 40M of input) into MLIR, then uses its multithreaded pass manager to do transformations. As it happens, the structure of this is that the parsing

Hi Ralph, Again, thanks so much for doing all this! Plus thanks to all the folks who contributed to the new release! Quick clarifying question -- Isn't CVE-2018-10392 (looks like it’s fixed in https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis/-/issues/2335) also included in new version 1.3.7? If so can you please add it to release notes? (I asked the same question in

Yes, the gitlab instance is the correct upstream development repository. We maintain a mirror at github for the convenience of developers there. Cheers, Ralph On Mon, 2020-06-29 at 21:27 +0000, Ellen Johnson wrote: > Hi Ralph and libvorbis developers, > I thought the vorbis gitlab project was the main development site ( > https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/vorbis) because that's what

Hi libvorbis developers! I'm wondering if you had a chance to see my request for releasing a new libvorvis version - this is to have an official libvorbis release containing the CVE fixes that appear to be fixed in the master branch. Is there anything we can do to help with getting a release out? We're happy to work with you on this. Please let us know if we can do anything to help

>>> You shouldn't have to add new classes to the .td file, just modify >>> printOp for your asmprinters. >> >> I dont think printOp is virtual and therefore cannot be overriden ? > > Why does it need to be virtual? No 'intel' printers want % signs. The GAS intel code generator generates percents, look at the X86InstrInfo.td file it is full of

Hi all, A friend just sent me this: http://www.mathworks.com/company/events/webinars/index.html?id=&language=en <http://www.mathworks.com/company/events/webinars/index.html?id=&language=en>And asked me if there is something of the like in the R community. Does anyone know of such a think ? Cheers, Tal ----------------Contact