Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[LLVMdev] Deadlock in llvm-lit on windows 7"
2017 Jan 06
3
LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed from clang.
Here is a problem scenario.
I want to enable a backend pass at -O2 or above.
if (TM->getOptLevel() >= CodeGenOpt::Default)
addPass(&xxxxx);
This pass will be run at -O1 too since clang is creating the TargetMachine with CodeGenOpt::Default for -O1.
--Sumanth G
-----Original Message-----
From: mehdi.amini at apple.com [mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com]
Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017
2015 Feb 10
4
[LLVMdev] C++ demangler for llvm tools
Hi,
AFAIK, the tools "symbolizer, objdump and nm" need a demangler.
I see there is libcxxabi which provides the demangle library. But there is
no support to build libcxxabi on windows with MSVC.
This left a huge void and my symbolizer cannot work on Windows if built with
MSVC.
Instead of mucking around OS dependencies, why shouldn't we have a demangle
library in LLVM.
2015 Jan 28
2
[LLVMdev] CMake: Gold linker detection
I reacted as per my case. You need CFLAGS in order to what linker you might be using.
In case of clang, you can use “-fuse-ld” to control the invocation of linker.
In my opinion, it is not necessary to carry forward LDFLAGS unless you want to control specific parts of the linker.
In my case, I have a cross compiler for ARM and I usually compile the code with
Clang
2017 Jan 06
2
LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed from clang.
getOptLevel() gets the level from TargetMachine which is created by the Backendutil in clang with either
"Default", "None" or "Aggressive". Threre is no correspondence for "Less".
This boils down to , if I pass "-O1", the Target Machine is created with CodeGenOpt::Default.
I am available on IRC @ sgundapa.
-----Original Message-----
From:
2017 Jan 06
2
LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed from clang.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Mehdi
> Amini via llvm-dev
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 11:10 AM
> To: Sumanth Gundapaneni
> Cc: LLVM Developers
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed
> from clang.
>
>
> > On Jan 6, 2017, at 10:56 AM, Sumanth
2015 Jul 28
2
[LLVMdev] [ARM]__modsi3 call in android
Hi,
I see there is an inconsistency in LLVM libc calls.
For a modulo (reminder) operation,
clang -target arm-none-linux-gnueabi generates "__modsi3".
clang -target arm-none-eabi generates "__aeabi_idivmod"
clang -target arm-linux-androideabi generates "__modsi3"
Android bionic libc doesn't provide a __modsi3, instead it provides
2015 Jan 27
2
[LLVMdev] CMake: Gold linker detection
Hi Rafael,
I looked at the code which you pushed a while ago to check
for the gold linker.
Code below:
execute_process(
COMMAND ${CMAKE_C_COMPILER} -Wl,--version
OUTPUT_VARIABLE stdout
ERROR_QUIET)
if("${stdout}" MATCHES "GNU gold")
set(LLVM_LINKER_IS_GOLD ON)
endif()
I was trying to build runtime libraries (compiler-rt)
2014 Dec 01
3
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
Hi,
I wonder if this is a valid flag in either clang/gcc.
The flag in question is "-march=aarch64". I verified with latest tip and neither clang nor gcc fail to recognize this flag.
This piece of code is in cmake/config-ix.cmake in compiler-rt repo.
+ elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64")
+ test_target_arch(aarch64
2015 Feb 12
2
[LLVMdev] Fixes to release_36 from master
Hi Hans,
I have attached a unit test which demonstrates a
hang/infinite loop with the opt built with release_36 sources.
The fixes are already pushed to "master" branch. The revisions r226588 and
r226616 should be pushed to release_36 to fix the unit test.
--Sumanth G
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2017 Jan 05
3
LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed from clang.
I want the optimization to be turned on at -O1 and above.
In my case, it is a target independent back-end pass. (Eg:
MachinePipeliner)
On 2017-01-04 18:10, Mehdi Amini wrote:
>> On Jan 4, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Sumanth Gundapaneni via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> I see the BackendUtil.cpp of Clang creates the TargetMachine with
>> the
2015 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] [ARM]__modsi3 call in android
On 28 July 2015 at 17:52, Sumanth Gundapaneni <sgundapa at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Android bionic libc doesn’t provide a __modsi3, instead it provides
> “__aeabi_idivmod”.
Hi Sumanth,
Have a look at ARMSubtarget.h, functions:
bool isTargetAEABI()
They control the lowering of DIV/MOD calls in ARMISelLowering.cpp.
Maybe Android needs to be in?
cheers,
--renato
2014 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
The point here is, if you are not building for Android.
You will hit this patch with cmake configuration -DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu
+ elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64")
+ test_target_arch(aarch64 "-march=aarch64")
I don't see "-march=aarch64" is a valid flag on either LLVM or GCC.
Should we replace this
2016 Jul 20
3
[CMake] LLVM_PROGRAM_PREFIX support
Hi,
I am planning to add support to CMake so that the binaries of llvm will
have a prefix appended to it.
At this point, I am stuck on which approach to follow
1. Append the prefix during build and install time. If so, this might
involve tweaking lit infrastructure to make sure lit picks the prefixed
binaries.
2. Append the prefix only during install time.
a. Either
2012 Aug 21
2
[LLVMdev] bugpoint (and possibly others) need to be compiled with -rdynamic
While running the llvm tests, I get several error messages like these:
[1/1] Running the LLVM regression tests
FAILED: cd /home/steve/llvm-build/test && /usr/local/bin/python /home/steve/llvm/utils/lit/lit.py --param build_config=. --param build_mode=Release -sv --param
llvm_site_config=/home/steve/llvm-build/test/lit.site.cfg --param
2014 Jul 10
3
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] CMake bug in building ARM builtins library
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 2:44 PM, sgundapa <sgundapa at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> No. CMake has different way of treating the .S files
> Refer to http://www.cmake.org/Wiki/CMake/Assembler
>
> I have a patch which will make CMake treat the .S files as source files.
>
Let me guess, you should just call set_source_file_properties(<arm .S
files> PROPERTIES LANGUAGE C)?
>
2014 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
On 16 December 2014 at 21:12, Gundapaneni, Sumanth <sgundapa at quicinc.com> wrote:
> The point here is, if you are not building for Android.
> You will hit this patch with cmake configuration -DCOMPILER_RT_TEST_TRIPLE=aarch64-linux-gnu
>
> + elseif("${COMPILER_RT_TEST_TARGET_ARCH}" MATCHES "aarch64")
> + test_target_arch(aarch64
2014 Jul 08
2
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] clang_rt.builtins-${arch} library on windows
Is there any specific reason why the clang_rt.builtins-${arch} library is
disabled for windows builds?
if (NOT WIN32)
foreach(arch x86_64 i386 arm)
if(CAN_TARGET_${arch})
set_source_files_properties(${${arch}_SOURCES} PROPERTIES
LANGUAGE C)
add_compiler_rt_runtime(clang_rt.builtins-${arch} ${arch} STATIC
SOURCES ${${arch}_SOURCES}
CFLAGS
2014 Jul 23
3
[LLVMdev] Sanitizer (compiler-rt) build errors on Linux bootstrap
The following bot is broken:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap/builds/4016
because of the following change (SVN r213684):
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4614
But it seems to build fine on my machine... I don't know enough about
CMake to tell, but that seemed to be a bug/feature in CMake to which
needed the work-around. Now, just looks like the work-around is
2017 Jan 05
4
LLVMTargetMachine with optimization level passed from clang.
I see the BackendUtil.cpp of Clang creates the TargetMachine with the
optimization level based on below mentioned logic
CodeGenOpt::Level OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::Default;
switch (CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel) {
default: break;
case 0: OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::None; break;
case 3: OptLevel = CodeGenOpt::Aggressive; break;
}
As per my understanding, the correspondence between
2014 Dec 10
2
[LLVMdev] [Compiler-rt] -march=aarch64 flag in gcc/clang
On 10 December 2014 at 16:06, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi Sumanth,
>
> Christophe (cc'd) is seeing the same problems on his build. It seems
> that r181130 (by Tim) has something to do with it, but I'm not sure.
>
> I remember trying to build compiler-rt on AArch64 natively in
> February, and even running the test-suite with it, so