similar to: [LLVMdev] ARM disassembler

Hi, I am curious to know about LLVM IR as platform independent feature. I have compiler some C and C++ applications that compiled on Linux 64bit machine, now I want to generate bit code file on Windows 64bit machine. 1) Will this execute without any issues? 2) Do I pass any option for making it operating system portable? 3) Can I generate bit code file also on Linux machine and then run on

Hi, My requirement is something like as given below, a.c => a.obj contains a1() and a2() function b.c => b.obj contains b1() and b2() function main.c => main.obj call to a1, a2, b1, b2 Now, I want to move a1(), a2() from a.obj to b2.obj and on top of function b1() When I call b1() from main, it should call first a1, a2 and then function definition of b1 Can you please give me some

Hi, Yes I am looking for IR pass that will do insert call of functions that defined in another file. Links/suggestions that guide me to start for adding IR pass will help me so much. Regards, Deepika On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:03 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > So how do you know what you want to modify (conceptually)? > > Have you got a IR pass that you

Hi, I need some help, As per my requirement, I am trying to lower down the x86_64bit binary LLVM IR to x86 LLVM IR. Instruction of x86_64 binary are as follows, mov rax, 1122334455667788 mov rax, 8877665544332211 To lower down the same in x86, I need to split 'rax' register into 'rax_lower' and 'rax_higher'. Can anybody please give me some pointer to do the same or any

Hi, I want to call/add some functions(that defined in another file) on top of some functions, and reflect the same changes in object file. No, I am not looking for contractor. Thanks, Deepika On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:04 PM, mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com> wrote: > What is the condition for adding this code? > > What have you tried so far? [Or are you looking for a

Hi Tim, Thank you for this information. I have another request for help from you, Below is my test case, iGetValueFromASM proc mov rax, 5 mov rax, 5 mov rax, 2 mov rax, 5 mov rax, 2 mov rax, 112233445566 add rax, 2 mov rax, 112233445566 add rax, 5 add rax, 2 I have lowered 32bit LLVM IR, %0 = type { i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32, i32,

Hi, Is decompilation possible in general to the SSA form for binaries? I assume one has to make certain assumptions about code in general to get tools like these to work. For example if code like with dlsym or jit heap allocated functions can be incorporated at runtime it would seem that in general it is quite difficult to ascertain the boundaries of a basic block and insert the correct phi

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some >> supported target) to LLVM IR? If there isn't, does this seem like >> something that would be feasible? There's plenty of variations on the idea: Revgen/S2E, Fracture, Dagger (my own), libcpu, several closed-source ones used by

Hi guys, I am following this[1] tutorial to install clang. However, I have made a small change in the configure command, and I am running it with '--enable-optimized' option to avoid the debug build. I am getting the errors (given at the end) related to *undeclared identifiers '__NR_*'*. Can someone please provide some input about how to tackle this issue? On my other machine, I

On 3/12/15 8:14 PM, Daniel Dilts wrote: > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Ahmed Bougacha > <ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com <mailto:ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 05:44:02PM -0700, Daniel Dilts wrote: > >> Does there exist a tool that could lift a binary (assembly for some > >> supported target) to LLVM IR?

Hello, This is not a Samba question itself, but it's somewhat related to Samba. I am planning to replace the two Windows 2000 Server servers in a client company with two Samba PDCs with LDAP backend. Currently, those W2K servers hold the Active Directory and the the antivirus management console. And this is the only nuisance we are finding when moving from Windows Server to Samba PDC. If

Dear R users, Suppose I have an vector like this: animal <- c("Tiger","Panda") I would like to know is there any function that check for the existence of certain item in a vector. e.g. > func("Tiger",animal) # check for the existence of "Tiger" TRUE > func("Acacia",animal) #Acacia is not an item of the animal vector FALSE I know

Hi Renato, > > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > > their software but for packaging purposes. > > > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > > Dragonegg. > > > > Hi Folks,

On 24/04/2013 12:53, 陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen) wrote: > Hi Sylvestre, > >>> Thanks for the info. I just contacted DSA (Debian System Admin, I >>> guess), and he said we have to prepare information list on [1] and >>> ask DD to approve it. Are you a DD, or Sylvestre is? >> I am (cf my email address). >> Why would like to do in this context ? > >

Hi, I installed Panda antivirus for linux but it uses Dazuko module for updating virus definition downloaded from internet to virus definitions database. So i downloaded dazuko ( tar package) software and tryed to install. But it generates the below defined errors, Which module in the kernel has to be enabled. Please help me i am using Centos 5.2 with kernel version of

For the following code below, the x-axis ticks are 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 when I was expection them to be 1,2,8,9,10,11,12. Please help me figure out where is the mistake. library(lattice) testdata <- as.data.frame(t(structure(c( 1,2005,9.24,6.18,634, 2,2005,8.65,6.05,96, 8,2004,6.81,6.51,16, 9,2004,9.0,7.29,8, 10,2004,8.84,6.18,524, 11,2004,8.54,6.35,579, 12,2004,9.97,6.3,614, 12,2005,8.75,5.84,32,

On 24 April 2013 12:01, Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre at debian.org> wrote: > Sorry but the goal of Debian porterboxes is not for upstream testing > their software but for packaging purposes. > > You should instead have a look to the GCC compilation farm: > http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm > Some LLVM developers are using these servers for testing LLVM and > Dragonegg.

Hi, my sip phone is unreachable for external network(global ip) Thanks, sandeep.s

Hi guys, I am compiling some programs with clang which use a couple of libraries. When I compile with the command - "clang -O2 -I. -o hello -ldl -llttng-ust hello.c tp.c", it goes successful. My aim is to get the bitcode for these programs but if I try to generate the bitcode with -emit-llvm option, it produces linking issues as follows : (also at - http://pastebin.com/zkmL2SAH)

On 11/24/16 3:12 AM, Arnaud De Grandmaison via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi Sandeep, > > The CMake version of the test-suite has been improved (see > https://reviews.llvm.org/D21360) so that it’s easy to plug additional > test suites. A starting point would be to look at how the > TEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS variable in the top level CMakeLists.txt is used. > I think this bug report