similar to: [LLVMdev] Release Manager Position

On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Bill Wendling <isanbard at gmail.com> wrote: >> After several years as LLVM release manager, I’ve decided to step down as release manager. I recently haven’t been able to focus as much time on LLVM development as I should, and I don’t want the releases to suffer

Hi Robert, Can you ping the code owners about these patches. It might be good to write a separate email per code owner and cc the appropriate -commits list. Thanks, Tom On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 06:16:44PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Tom, > > I would like to nominate the following patches to be backported to 3.4.1 > > Clang: > 1. r204742 - Zinovy Nis <zinovy.nis at

On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tom Stellard <tstellar at redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/26/2017 12:52 PM, Hans Wennborg wrote: >> I'm a little vary of adding more fields, because I think we already >> have lots of fields that are never used. >> > > I'm up for removing unused fields too. Which ones did you have in mind? I think URL, Keywords, Alias, and

Have you been sleeping poorly worried about the Clang 3.5 release? Well, this may help! The plan right now is to start testing in July with August as the target release month. There isn’t a schedule yet, of course. But it should be a goodly amount of time for all y’all to prepare for the release process. If you have any questions, please let me know. If you’d like to volunteer to be a tester,

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can begin. We can always use > > more testers, so if you are interested in testing, let me know. > > I had trouble building on Windows, getting errors in > AMDGPUGenSubtargetInfo.inc

You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :) Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded. On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We

Hi, The only regression in 3.6.1 -rc1 was on MIPS and it has been confirmed fixed, so I have now tagged 3.6.1 -final. Testers can start building and uploading the final binaries. Thanks, Tom

I'm a little vary of adding more fields, because I think we already have lots of fields that are never used. Having said that, your suggestions seem reasonable, and it would be cool if we could create tools to automate the release process a bit more based on this. On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Ping. > > On

On 24 Jun 2015, at 22:29, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:11:26AM -0700, Hans Wennborg wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: >>>> I have just tagged 3.6.2-rc1, so testing can

On 07/27/2017 05:17 PM, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: > On 07/26/2017 06:41 PM, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers wrote: >> Dear testers, >> >> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >> > > Hi Hans, > > I see 1 regression one ppc64le: > > libomp :: tasking/omp_taskloop_grainsize.c > This isn't actually a regression, it's just a new test.

Hi, I would like to begin the 3.4.2 release process for LLVM. There have been two issues identified in 3.4.1, which there is interest in having fixed in a 3.4.x release: 1. Build failure with gcc 4.9 (This is not a regression, 3.4 also fails to build with gcc 4.9). 2. Accidental change of libLLVM's DT_SONAME from libLLVM-3.4 libLLVM-3.4.1.so I will also accept any other bug-fixes that

It's probably PR12517. Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH: $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH RPATH $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin This will slow things down if the system tries to automount /home/aadgrand. Maybe we should merge r182559

Daniel, Note the openmp library only has cmake build machinery preventing autoconf-based builds. Jack On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'll do Mips as usual. Are we going to do an autoconf-based build for LLVM 3.7? If so, I might try Mips64 packages too. > >> -----Original

LLVM 8.0.1 is now available! Download it now, or read the release notes. This release contains bug-fixes for the LLVM 8.0.0 release. This release is API and ABI compatible with 8.0.0. LLVM 8.0.1 would not be possible without the help of our volunteer release team! Thanks to all the release testers: Dimitry Andric, Hans Wennborg, Yvan Roux, Sylvestre Ledru, Michał Górny, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer,

LLVM 8.0.1 is now available! Download it now, or read the release notes. This release contains bug-fixes for the LLVM 8.0.0 release. This release is API and ABI compatible with 8.0.0. LLVM 8.0.1 would not be possible without the help of our volunteer release team! Thanks to all the release testers: Dimitry Andric, Hans Wennborg, Yvan Roux, Sylvestre Ledru, Michał Górny, Bernhard Rosenkraenzer,

Dear everyone, It's not quite time to start the 3.8 release process, but it's time to start planning. Please let me know if you want to help with testing and building release binaries for your favourite platform. (If you were a tester on the previous release, you're cc'd on this email.) I propose the following schedule for the 3.8 release: - 13 January: Create 3.8 branch.

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:08:13PM +0400, Robert Khasanov wrote: > Hi Reid, > > Would you approve your patches r203146 and r202774 to be backported to > 3.4.1? They fix stability issues in x86 asm. > Hi Robert, I was able to merge r203146, but it used a c++11 feature: std::string::back() which I replaced with std::string::at(std::string::size() - 1). r202774 was not merged,

Hi, 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We can always use more testers, so if you would like to volunteer, let me know. For those that are new to testing, please review the documentation for how validate a new release: http://llvm.org/docs/ReleaseProcess.html Remember that when we check for regressions we want to compare the test results of 3.5.1-rc1 with 3.5.0-final.

Hi, The 8.0.1 final release has been tagged. Testers please upload the final binaries. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final binaries. -Tom