similar to: [LLVMdev] New type of smart pointer for LLVM

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> wrote: > Ping! > > Suggested is a wrapper over a raw pointer that is intended for freeing > wrapped memory at the end of wrappers lifetime if ownership of a raw > pointer was not taken away during the lifetime of the wrapper. > The main difference from unique_ptr is an ability to access the wrapped

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote: > Anton Yartsev <anton.yartsev at gmail.com> writes: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I bring to discussion the necessity/design of a new type of smart > pointer. > > r215176 and r217791 rise the problem, D5443 is devoted to the solution. > > r215176 applies several

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 1:44 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 September 2014 06:16, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > I can go & dredge up some examples if we want to discuss the particular > > merits & whether each of those cases would be better solved in some other > > way, but it seemed pervasive enough in the

Thanks for the feedback! > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:36 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com > <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:14 PM, Anton Yartsev > <anton.yartsev at gmail.com <mailto:anton.yartsev at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Ping! > > Suggested is a wrapper over a raw pointer

[+cfe-dev] This conversation has already been happening on llvm-dev so there's no good way for me to capture the entire existing discussion (so I'm jumping you in part-way) & the subject line could be more descriptive, but I wanted to add Clang developers since many of the interesting cases of conditional ownership I've seen were in Clang. I know some of you are also on llvm-dev

hi I''m using restful_authentication and have controller specs working using users fixtures (and login_as) however i''ve been trying for hours without success to do it without fixtures, using mocks and stubs instead. anyone here done this? got code? :) thanks

Ping - we've hit another of these (propagating Diagnostic::OwnsDiagClient into other places) in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=221884 Any ideas how we should be tackling this overall? I'm not entirely convinced these are fixable by design and I think we might honestly want a conditional-ownership smart pointer... But I'm happy to hold off on that a

I spent some time on this simple question, also searched the forum, eventually hacked my way to an ugly solution for my particular problem but I would like to improve my coding: I have data of the form: df <- expand.grid(group=c('copper', 'zinc', 'aluminum', 'nickel'), condition1=c(1:4)) I would like to add a new data column "condition2", with values

Dear R Experts, I am attempting to run a mixed effects model on a within-subjects repeated measures design, but I am unsure if I am doing it properly. I was hoping that someone would be able to offer some guidance. There are 5 independent variables (subject, condition, difficulty, repetition) and 1 dependent measure (value). Condition and difficulty are fixed effects and have 3 levels each

Hi All: Let's say I have two dataframes (Condition1 and Condition2); each being on the order of 12,000 and 16,000 rows; 1 column. The entries contain dates. I'd like to calculate, for each possible pair of dates (that is: Condition1[1:10,000] and Condition2[1:10,000], the number of days difference between the dates in the pair. The result should be a matrix 12,000 by 16,000. Really,

Hi all. I have a next problem. I need to implement some object that will work with both const and "constless" object: Instruction* and const Instruction*, for example. How to implement it better? Currently I see two possible ways: 1. Templates. template <class InstructionTy> class InstructionProcessorT { InstructionTy *Inst; InstructionProcessor(InstructionTy *I) : Inst(I) {}

Hello, I have a class Person class Persoon < ActiveRecord::Base set_table_name "Persoon" set_primary_key "p_persoon" has_many :adres, :class_name => "Adres" composed_of :name, :class_name => Name, :mapping => [ [:naam,:naam], [:voornaam,:voornaam], [:voornaam2,:voornaam2], [:persnickname,:persnickname], [:perssortname,:perssortname] ] def

Hello, I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug): class Bli<string _t> { string t = _t; } class Bla<list<Bli> _bli> : Bli<!car(_bli).t> { } #0 0x00007ffff6ebda75 in *__GI_raise

I got it to work by changing scheduled_end_date= nil to self.scheduled_end_date= nil. I believe these statements should be equivilent. I don''t know Ruby/Rails well enough to know when, if or why that should matter. Can someone educate me please? I want to believe this framework is ready for production work, but silently dropping data is a very big problem. I expect that I''ve

Dear list members, I want to perform in R the analysis "simultaneous confidence interval for multiple proportions", as illustrated in the article of Agresti et al. (2008) "Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameter", Biometrics 64, 1270-1275. If I am not wrong the R function implementing the Agresti et al. method is prop.test(). I ask an help because I

On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Amaury Pouly wrote: > Hello, > I was fiddling with TableGen (for a use that has nothing to do with a compiler but it's doesn't matter) and TableGen triggers an assertion failure on this code (I reduced the case to the minimum, it's a parsing bug): David, can you take a look? This is related to your lisp interpreter :) -Chris > > class

Hi LLVMers, I found a bug in TGParser that is causing llvm-tblgen to crash on bad input. The reduced testcase is attached. The output follows: $ ./llvm-tblgen --version Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/): LLVM version 3.1svn DEBUG build with assertions. Built Jan 20 2012 (15:46:08). Default target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0 Host CPU: penryn $ ./llvm-tblgen bug.td 0

Dear all, I'm routinely using lattice and ggplot2, I wish to create a lattice theme that looks not too dissimilar to ggplot's defaults so I can include both graphs in a document with a consistent look. To illustrate my questions, consider the following example: > library(ggplot2) > library(lattice) > > # example data > x <- seq(0, 10, len = 100) > y1 <-

Hi, I think Chris recently did this with ArrayRef - that might be a good template to base your solution on? Cheers, James -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Stepan Dyatkovskiy Sent: 16 February 2012 06:36 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about "const" Hi all. I have a next

Hello, I have a data frame with a factor column, which uniquely identifies the observations in the data frame and it looks like this: sample1_condition1_place1 sample2_condition1_place1 sample3_condition1_place1 . . . sample3_condition3_place3 I want to turn it into three separate factor columns "sample", "condition" and "place". This is what I did so far: #