similar to: [LLVMdev] Compiler-RT buildbot on ARM

Hi, I'm not sure what's up with BuiltinLongJmpTest. I think Greg was the last to do anything about arm-linux support in asan. As for the aarch64 failures, do you want to build the aarch64 bit stuff, but not run the tests? In cmake we try to detect target platforms supported by the compiler, but we don't check that binaries actuall run. But why is there so little failures, if the

Folks, As of this run: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv7-a15-full/builds/746 There are three classes of failures that need fixing before we get the bot green: 1. AddressSanitizer.BuiltinLongJmpTest Unit Test Two configurations fail: * Asan-arm-inline-Test * Asan-arm-with-calls-Test I wonder what's the best way to run it individually and reduce the error. I'm not

Evgeniy, I'm getting this error while building on ARM: clang (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument '-asan-instrument-assembly'. Try: 'clang (LLVM option parsing) -help' clang (LLVM option parsing): Did you mean '-asan-instrument-atomics'? [6/32] Generating ASAN_INST_TEST_OBJECTS.asan_asm_test.cc.arm-inline.o This doesn't happen on x86_64, so

Thanks. From the debugging I've done so far it looks like it could be another 32-bit big-endian specific bug. It seems to be segfaulting in the memset() in allocate_stack.c (from glib) because given stack pointer is null. I'm guessing this is because it read the wrong half of a 64-bit value somewhere but I haven't identified where it goes wrong. ________________________________________

On 8 October 2014 12:38, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: > When running the final binary. Same thing... :( Should I bisect where that got broken? Do you have any way of testing that locally? This is just a basic CMake build on ARM, nothing special. "ninja check-asan". cheers, --renato

On 3 October 2014 15:20, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: > That's a third option. This flag only really makes sense for one or > several test cases in a large GTest file. They can be split and moved > to X86. But this adds more complexity to build system which, in my > opinion, is never good. Roger. > Compiler-rt and llvm build systems know very little

I've just noticed that this is a new test added in r248325 and has never passed on this builder. Added the author of the test (Evgeniy). From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Sanders via llvm-dev Sent: 01 October 2015 20:34 To: David Blaikie Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-mips > > I do. I'll take

This buildbot seems to have been failing continuously for a couple of weeks now ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-mips-linux/builds/14658 ) - is anyone watching it/caring about it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:34 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on llvm-mips-linux To: Ahmed Bougacha

Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: In file included from ../projects/lld/include/lld/Core/Parallel.h:28: In file included from /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:38:

This buildbot appears to have been failing for several weeks now ( http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64-elf-linux2/builds/19490 ). Does anyone know/own/care about it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:17 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-ppc64-elf-linux2 To: Aaron Ballman <aaron at

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 9/25/2016 - 10/1/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the last week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green); Count of commits by project; Number of completed

The failure is a bit odd. LLVM is ignoring $PWD because it doesn't have the same inode as '.'. This causes the test failure because DW_AT_comp_dir and $PWD differ. However, $PWD and '.' should be the same inode since $PWD is a symlink to the current directory and stat() looks through symlinks. > Since this latest board only has two cores, it will run slower and it will need

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016. Please see the same data in attached csv files: The longest time each builder was red during the week; "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green); Count of commits by project; Number of completed builds, failed

Hi Evgeniy, Can you add the step to checkout lld and build and run the unittests then ? Thanks Shankar Easwaran On 9/10/2013 4:59 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov wrote: > Does it build with libstdc++? I've got this with fresh clang, -std=c++11: > > In file included from ../projects/lld/lib/ReaderWriter/ELF/./SectionChunks.h:19: > In file included from

This buildbot looks like it's been failing since Friday - does anyone know/own/care about it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 7:29 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on clang-cmake-thumbv7-a15-full-sh To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>, Cameron Esfahani <dirty at apple.com>, Chris Bieneman

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/05/2016 - 6/11/2016. Thanks Galina buildername | was_red -----------------------------------------------------------+----------- sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap | 134:12:25 perf-x86_64-penryn-O3-polly-parallel-fast | 46:29:26

This buildbot seems to have been failing for a while (though it's hard for me to identify the root cause in the logs, as I mentioned in another thread, so it's hard to say if it's the same failure, or if the failure is consistent, etc) - anyone watching it/caring aobut it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at

On Tue, 2015-09-29 at 14:29 -0500, Hal Finkel wrote: > [+Bill and Bill] > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "David Blaikie via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > To: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 12:39:02 PM > > Subject: [llvm-dev] Fwd: buildbot failure in LLVM on

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the week of 3/06/2016 - 3/12/2016. Thanks Galina "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green): buildername | builds | changes | status change ratio

Hello everyone, Below are some buildbot numbers for the last week of 3/13/2016 - 3/19/2016. Thanks Galina "Status change ratio" by active builder (percent of builds that changed the builder status from greed to red or from red to green): buildername | builds | changes | status change ratio