similar to: [LLVMdev] SVN infrastructure woes

On 10 September 2014 12:30, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > llvm.org seemed to be completely down this morning. It came up again > around 1127 (UTC+1). Yes, and this seems to be going on for quite a few weeks already. Maybe we need to be using the git mirror for the bots? cheers, --renato

> But I don't think there's a reason we couldn't point the bots at the github > mirrors. I'm not sure if they lag the official mirror though. The GitHub mirrors located at [1] are updated hourly which is not frequent enough There seems to be an LLVM organisation registered on GitHub but it doesn't seem to be in use. [1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/ [2]

On 10 September 2014 13:09, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > git mirror is located on llvm.org as well... :) d'oh! Should we start planning a wider infrastructure with separate servers for separate functionality? Seems like we're putting all our eggs, apples and oranges in the same basket. cheers, --renato

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > * Who should fund whatever host is used to host the LNT > infrastructure. Given the commercial interest in LLVM I hope that this > will be straight forward > FWIW, if you can use google's cloud offerings, I can likely fund it. This isn't about only being willing to fund our platform vs. some other

On 4 June 2013 22:08, Reed Kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > is test-suite being run still by itself (independent of llvm)? > AFAIK, yes. http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html if so, are there public build bots for this? > We have one: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt Setting it up was just copy&paste on Zorg's config (and fixing the bugs

Hi Renato, We're also seeing this on internal bots. My first guess is that it was triggered by the Flask package getting updated at Pypi on 29th of May, see https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Flask. I haven't investigated further at this point. Thanks, Kristof On 29 May 2016, at 14:28, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org<mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: Folks,

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> > To weigh in here... >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, David

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > To weigh in here... > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +Daniel & Michael who work on the LNT infrastructure & might have some >> thoughts on the differences & their merits & motivations. >> >> On

Renato, Kristof, I confirm this is due to the latest Flask --- Flask-0.11 was released this weekend --- and for some unknown (to me at least) reason, although LNT's requirements.txt pins Flask to version 0.10.1, pip installs Flask-0.11. Forcing Flask to 0.10.1 gets the situation back to normal. Reading pip's documentation makes me think it's not able to resolve dependencies

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > To weigh in here... > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> +Daniel & Michael who work on the LNT

Folks, Its seems that the latest master restart has introduced a failure in *many* test-suite bots: File "/home/buildslave/buildslave/clang-cmake-aarch64-full/test/lnt/lnt/server/ui/decorators.py", line 6, in <module> frontend = flask.Module(__name__) AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'Module'

I hope I've fixed this properly just now in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=271274. Fingers crossed that the bots will come back now... On 30 May 2016, at 21:01, Arnaud De Grandmaison <Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com<mailto:Arnaud.DeGrandmaison at arm.com>> wrote: I honestly do not know how to fix that --- I would otherwise I've committed a fix.

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:52 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:52 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie

On 12 February 2014 22:06, Chris Matthews <chris.matthews at apple.com> wrote: > 1) Change the default logging strategy in LNT. We should be emailing the sysadmin on all ISEs. > > 2) Update the bots to make submission optional, and don't submit when not wanted. > > 3) Split the bot's use of LNT up to have a separate submission step. Then mark this new submission step

On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:17 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:52 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at

Hello build bot owners! The staging master is ready. Please feel free to use it to make sure your bots would work well with the monorepo and github. The following builders could be configured to build monorepo: * clang-atom-d525-fedora-rel * clang-native-arm-lnt-perf * clang-cmake-armv7-lnt * clang-cmake-armv7-selfhost-neon * clang-cmake-armv7-quick * clang-cmake-armv7-global-isel *

Hi Galina, It seems that our libcxx bots are now triggering builds for any changes to llvm: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/libcxx-libcxxabi-libunwind-aarch64-linux/builds/2434 Should I file a bug report for this? Thanks, Diana On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 11:36, Galina Kistanova via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > The staging master is

Hi, So, I owe you all an apology. I was totally unaware that the llvm.org server, running at UIUC, was still in operation and hosting an active LNT instance. I was under the assumption the LNT server ran elsewhere. As a result, the ability for the LNT bots to submit run information to the "old" LNT server is now gone. I am very sorry for this oversight. In speaking with Chris

So far two bots have complained about 2.7 (but have 2.6): http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/clang-i686-cygwin-RA-centos6/builds/12836/steps/configure/logs/stdio http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-s390x-linux1/builds/12002/steps/configure/logs/stdio Should we just upgrade those bots or reduce the requirement to 2.6? On 12 December 2014 at 06:41, Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk> wrote: > +1